Wednesday, February 7, 2007

Surging Right Into Bin Laden's Hands


Al Qaeda's 20 Year Plan: Escalation

By ADAM ELKUS
CounterPunch

"Lost in the "surge" debate is the unfortunate reality that escalation in Iraq, just like the invasion itself, plays into al-Qaida's ultimate strategy to eliminate America. As revealed in a 2005 strategy document, al-Qaida hopes to repeat Osama bin Laden's victory over the Soviet empire in Afghanistan by eliminating the chief obstacle in the way of establishing an Islamic caliphate in the Middle East. The goal is not, as Bush administration and right-wing pundits proclaim, to conquer or directly destroy America. Osama bin Laden wants to provoke the United States into destroying itself.

The game plan owes at least part of its inspiration from Paul Kennedy's book The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. In his investigative report The Secret History of Al-Qaeda, Abdel Bari Atwan writes that top al-Qaida ideologist Ayman Al-Zawahiri is a reader and "great admirer" of Kennedy's book. The New York Times Book Review's Michael Howard summarized the book's insights in a manner that must have clicked with budding jihadists observing the Soviet Union's fall at the time: "Power can be maintained only by a prudent balance between the creation of wealth and military expenditure, and great powers in decline almost always hasten their demise by shifting expenditure from the former to the latter.

According to Atwan's analysis of al-Qaida's "20-year plan," the organization aimed to bring about the fall of the American empire by first provoking ­ with the September 11 attacks -- Washington into irrationally invading Muslim lands in pursuit of revenge. Al-Qaida's grand strategists calculated that the invasion would propel the umma, the Muslim community, into joining the jihad. Following the fall of the secular socialist Hussein regime, Iraq has indeed become a training ground for limitless waves of foreign jihadis.

In this context, George W. Bush was a great boon to their efforts. Not only did he invade Iraq, which did not have a thing to do with 9/11, but he did almost everything possible to isolate America from its allies. This policy gave bin Laden ample room to target unpopular pro-American regimes from Madrid to Riyadh. Compared to the Southwest Asian battleground of Afghanistan, Iraq is a more congenial base for al-Qaida, since the language, culture, and terrain are more familiar to most Arabs. The jihadis' strategy is to get America to throw all of its resources into fighting a losing battle against Iraq's lethal patchwork of warring factions.

Bush's "surge" only throws more meat to the jackals, who gain strength and popularity with each web-broadcasted beheading or roadside bomb explosion. Like Afghanistan, Iraq gives would-be jihadis watching the conflict from their computer screens the hope of destroying the military might of the West. The jihadis also hope to expand the conflict to create what Atwan calls a "Triangle of Horror" connecting Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Lebanon, and Syria......"

Continue

The Looming Shadow of Nuremberg


An Open Letter to America's Soldiers from the Ranks

By TONY SWINDELL
CounterPunch

"Crimes Listed by the Nuremberg Standard of 1947: a war of aggression, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for its accomplishment; murder or ill-treatment of civilian populations in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war; plunder of public or private property; wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity; crimes against humanity such as murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war.

Abu Ghraib, Haditha, Fallujah, the rape of Lebanon, the concentration camps in the West Bank and Gaza, clandestine prisons, the Iraq embargo of the 1990s, Halliburton, and Black Water. There are more, but these will suffice to compare against the Nuremberg Standard. It will not be a difficult task. For example, start with Halliburton and the plunder of public (American taxpayers') property.

How many of you recognize the name of Army Warrant Officer Hugh Thompson, Jr.?

I do because he and I stood on and flew over the same ground nearly 40 years ago. Like him, I left a little blood and a lot of sweat in a Godforsaken place halfway around the world, earning four battle stars in 11 months. Plus some cheap tin and ribbon medals made even cheaper by the good friends who never came home with me. Thompson did, too.

Hugh was a helicopter pilot who aimed his guns at American soldiers--members of my brigade -- to keep them from slaughtering civilians in the Vietnamese hamlet of My Lai 4. Spotting massacred civilians around My Lai, Thompson and his two-man crew landed beside wounded civilians to give medical help as the infantry company commander and others present kept shooting the wounded. Thompson ordered his crew to open fire if the slaughter continued. No more civilians were shot.

Thompson's story is critical because the march to a nuclear war against Iran has begun, and YOU will the ones carrying it out. There is no way to effectively "confront" Iran except with tactical nuclear weapons. Tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children will die outright or suffer lingering deaths from horrible radiation sicknesses. It will be murder, pure and simple. Look at the suffering around you and multiply it by hundreds.

No doubt you know that back home, 80 per cent of the American people voted in the last election to end the Iraq debacle, but no one in Washington listened. Our two-faced media watchdogs are a gaggle of neocon propaganda peddlers, corporate whores and New World Order shills who helped orchestrate and cheerlead the slaughter, and they sneer at your patriotism behind your backs......"

Continue

UNRWA opens tented school for stranded Palestinians


Report, UNRWA, 7 February 2007

"Some 90 Palestinian refugee children whose families have been stranded over the last nine months at al-Tanf border crossing point between Iraq and Syria, living in a makeshift refugee camp, started attending an UNRWA tented school on 3 February.

At this school, UNRWA will provide general education for refugee children at elementary and preparatory levels as prescribed by the Syrian Ministry of Education. Managed by the UNRWA education programme, with eight teachers from the refugee community in al-Tanf serving as staff, the school will help cater for the refugees' educational needs. The school is opened in collaboration with UNICEF, who provided the educational material, and UNHCR, who provided the four tents needed for the school. Eight volunteer teachers attended a training course on teaching methodology in Damascus from 16-24 January. These volunteer teachers also joined a group of Agency teachers in peer coaching sessions in their specialisations in order to strengthen their teaching skills.

Around 354 Palestinians who fled targeted harassment and violence in Baghdad are now stranded at al-Tanf in the no man's land between the Syrian and Iraqi borders. All of them fled Baghdad under difficult conditions and have encountered serious human rights abuses. The group feels it's position on the border is insecure and tensions are rising.

"International support is needed to find a solution for Palestinians from Iraq. They are facing a harsh winter in the desert. We hope the opening of these schools will provide some structure and stability in these children's lives" said Panos Moumtzis, Director of UNRWA Affairs, Syria.

UNRWA is a humanitarian and human development Agency providing education, health care, social services, micro-credit and emergency relief to over 4 million registered refugees living in the Gaza Strip, West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon and the Syrian Arab Republic. In Syria, the Agency provides assistance to over 430,000."

My Nominee To Head The Palestinian "Unity" Government



I repeat this nomination since this candidate offers the following advantages:

1) He is acceptable to Usrael.

2) He has more spine and charisma than the alternatives.

3) He will end the starvation blockade imposed by Usrael/EU/Arab regimes.

4) He will bring a smile to the traumatized and starved Palestinian children.

5) He will give the PA the dignity and respect it deserves.

More Americans Dying in Iraq than Ever Before


"At least 334 U.S. soldiers died from combat in Iraq from October to the end of January, the most of any four month period to date. Battles in Baghdad have grown more frequent and roadside bombs have gotten more sophisticated and powerful, yet the president is as determined as ever to send more Americans into what Chuck Hagel called “that grinder.”"

(Click on cartoon to enlarge)
By Mike Luckovich

I have spoken about this terrorist past for Da'wa before


By Juan Cole

"I could never understand why the members of the Republican Party in the US were so delirious with joy that their president had installed the Da'wa Party in power in Iraq.

But the US intelligence agencies knew all this. So why are they making a big deal about MP Muhammad now?

I do not know. But I entertain deep, dark suspicions that this leak is a means for the US to put pressure on Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. He is surely vulnerable to this sort of blackmail himself, since no Da'wa activist in Damascus in the 1980s can have been completely innocent of the organization's then darker side. I suspect the message to al-Maliki is, back off from the Mahdi Army and back off from Iran, or we can arrange to put you in the same docket as MP Muhammad.

As for the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, another main component of the ruling bloc in Iraq, it was a Khomeinist organization in the 1980s and 1990s that ran a guerrilla paramilitary, the Badr Corps. I don't know that it ever hit a specifically American target. But it wasn't exactly a US ally. To say the least.

If you start worrying about the Shiite government of Iraq having people in it who were anti-American in the 1980s, you'd have to arrest the lot of them. This is self-evident to US intelligence agencies. Therefore, making a big deal out of Muhammad is likely a way of telegraphing a threat."

It is no use blaming Iran for the insurgency in Iraq

By Patrick Cockburn
The Independent

"It is scarcely surprising that the Iranian government believes that the United States is behind the kidnapping of one of its diplomats in Baghdad on Sunday. The Iranians say he was seized by 30 uniformed men from an Iraqi army commando battalion that often works with the US military services in Iraq.

The US had already shown its contempt for any diplomatic immunity protecting Iranians in Iraq by arresting five officials in a long-established Iranian office in the Kurdish city of Arbil last month. The White House had earlier authorised US forces to kill or capture Iranians deemed to be a threat.

It is striking how swiftly Washington is seeking to escalate its confrontation with Iran. Its rhetoric has returned to the strident tone so often heard when the US was accusing Saddam Hussein in 2002 and 2003 of hiding weapons of mass destruction that threatened the world......

The answer to this question is probably that the anti-Iranian tilt of the Bush administration has more to do with American than Iraqi politics. A fresh demon is being presented to the US voter. Iran is portrayed as the hidden hand behind US failure in both Iraq and in Lebanon. The US media, gullible over WMD, is showing itself equally gullible over this exaggerated Iranian threat.

The Bush administration has always shown itself more interested in holding power in Washington than in Baghdad. Whatever its failures on the battlefield, the Republicans were able to retain the presidency and both Houses of Congress in 2004. Confrontation with Iran, diverting attention from the fiasco in Iraq, may be their best chance of holding the White House in 2008."

This aerial onslaught is war at its most stupid

The images of US 'friendly fire' show how good bombers are at hurting, but how bad they are at winning

Simon Jenkins
Wednesday February 7, 2007
The Guardian

"Watching a person kill another is the purest horror. Watching it done from the air, from a sanitised distance, is less so. Distance launders the bloodletting and technology purifies it. War becomes another video game. The camera sees no broken bodies. If it sees a mistake it does not see the mistake that caused the mistake.....

The recent recourse of British troops in Afghanistan to aerial bombardment has, by general agreement, set back the cause of winning hearts and minds. A relative killed or a village destroyed only fertilises the desire for revenge. "One dead Pashtun recruits 10 Taliban," is not an idle boast. Close air support may win one day's battle, but only to necessitate another. Yet Nato forces in Afghanistan continue to bomb villages from the air.

Britain is now fighting two wars which it is patently losing. In such circumstances the killing of the enemy appears to be the only policy that delivers good news. In Iraq and Afghanistan kill rates have taken on the symbolic role they served in Vietnam. "We may not be winning but they are hurting," is the general's desperate cry. Yesterday we were shown how good bombers are at hurting, but how bad they are at winning. They are war at its most stupid."

Buck Fush

Fatah, Hamas assert common stand against “fifth column”

By Khalid Amayreh

"Al-Khalil - Representatives of Fatah and Hamas as well as community leaders in Dura, al-Khalil district, on Tuesday reaffirmed their common stand against “saboteurs and agent provocateurs” who are trying to spread the Gaza infighting to the West Bank.

“We affirm our united stand against these faceless and suspicious elements lurking in our midst and seeking to create divisions and spark off infighting in the service of Israel,” said a joint statement by Fatah and Hamas in the Dura region.

Local Fatah and Islamic leaders, who gathered at the municipal council Tuesday afternoon, jointly visited the village of al-Sirri, 5 kilometers southwest of Dura, to show solidarity with the Masri clan following an assassination attempt on Sunday by unknown masked elements on a member of the clan.

Salmaeh al-Masri, 30, was moderately injured in his knee when anonymous gunmen riding a car opened fire on him as he was walking out of the local mosque in the village following the sunset prayers.

Al-Masri, a teacher, was rushed to the al-Ahli Hospital in al-Khalil where he underwent an urgent operation. Treating doctors described his condition as “good.”

Al-Masri was released from hospital Tuesday.

Speaking at the Masri clan’s Diwan or reception house, Ziad Rajoub, Secretary-General of the Fatah chapter in the southern al-Khalil region, said all Palestinians and Palestinian factions, including Fatah and Hamas, were united against “those who spill Palestinian blood.”

“He who spills Palestinian blood bears full responsibility for his crime. We will not give criminals and spreaders of division any cover or legitimacy.”

He described the would-be-assassins of al-Masri as “scum and vermin.”

“We will not seek to beautify an ugly face, and anyone who has information on the identity of the attackers must convey it to the police immediately.”

Rajoub urged Palestinians, including political factions and ordinary people, to display “maximal vigilance and national awareness because the agents of the occupation are lurking in our midst for the purpose of destroying our cause.”

Ismael Awawdeh, Chief Engineer at Dura Municipal Council, said that both Hamas and Fatah shouldn’t allow a “bunch of mercenaries, suspicious elements to poison our life and create mischief and malice and mistrust among the brothers.”

“We should call these faceless criminals who open fire on our people here and there by their real name. These are agents of the Israeli intelligence, they are the enemies of our people, I say this regardless of the political title of the perpetrator or the victim.”

A Palestinian intelligence official who spoke at the rally urged citizens to notify the security apparatus of any suspicious individuals and to inform the police of any piece of information that could lead to the apprehension of the perpetrators.

Fakhri Amr, a community leader, warned “all actual or potential evildoers” that “you and you alone would bear responsibility for whatever fully you might commit against another person.”

“We are one family here, and we will not tolerate dragging this area to infighting and tumult,” he asserted."

Chinook Down....




"Feb 7, 2007 — BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The U.S. military said it was checking reports that a helicopter, possibly a Chinook transport aircraft, had either crashed or made an emergency landing near Baghdad on Wednesday.

An Iraqi policeman who had been to the area northwest of Baghdad told Reuters he had seen wreckage on the ground. One witness who said he saw the helicopter come down also said he had seen wreckage.

U.S. soldiers had moved in to secure the area, witnesses said.

"We have heard about this … but I cannot confirm anything at this stage," said Lieutenant-Colonel Christopher Garver, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad.

The U.S. military said on Sunday it was adjusting its tactics in Iraq after four helicopters were shot down over a two-week period.

Those helicopters were shot down in four separate incidents in which 21 U.S. servicemen and private security contractors were killed. Dozens of U.S. helicopters have come down, some hit by missiles or gunfire, in four years of fighting in Iraq.

But the high number lost in such a short time had raised questions about whether militants had changed tactics or were using more sophisticated weapons.

At least two witnesses said they saw the helicopter, which they described as a twin-rotor Chinook, come down on Wednesday amid gunfire from the ground. Some witnesses said they saw smoke before the helicopter went down, while others said they had not seen any.

The Chinook has two crew and can carry up to 55 passengers. They are used widely to transport troops and cargo around Iraq."

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Abu Ghraib: "Man In the Hood" provides testimony at War Crimes Conference

'Man In The Hood' Tells Of His Tale In Abu Ghraib

"KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 6 (Bernama) -- Ali Shalah, popularly known as 'the man in the hood' in a famous photograph depicting the torture suffered by Iraqis at the American-run Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, today spilled the beans on the inhumane treatment he received at the detention centre.

Ali, who now heads an organisation representing tortured victims in Iraq, captivated some 2,000 people with his story at the three-day War Crimes Conference at the Putra World Trade Centre, organised by the Perdana Global Peace Organisation headed by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

"My nightmare began on 13th October, 2003, when I was arrested and put in a small room, which I later found out to be a toilet, which was flooded with water and human waste. I was interrogated in that room.

"They asked me if I was Sunni or Shiaa. I replied that we didn't have that kind of difference in Iraq. They also claimed that I had helped instigate people to oppose the occupation and to reveal the location of Osama bin Laden.

"They also said I was an important person in the Iraqi resistance. I was then marked to be transferred to Abu Ghraib. They wrote "big fish" on my forehead denoting that I was an important detainee," he said, relating his experience at a special session chaired by Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali, the wife of Dr Mahathir.

He said he was then beaten up and put in the truck and then transferred to the prison, which had five sectors with each sector having a tent surrounded by a wall and barbed wire.

The living conditions in these tents were bad with each tent accommodating 45 to 50 detainees, he said, adding that each tent was given only 60 litres of water daily for washing, cooking and cleaning.

"Our breakfast was at 5am, lunch at 8am while dinner was at 1pm. During Ramadhan, food was given at midnight but food was again given during the day, encouraging us to break our fast."

Ali said he was interrogated twice during his stay at the infamous prison but "I heard that detainees were tortured using lighted cigarettes and by injecting hallucinogens".

"After one month, I was called up and my hands were tied, a hood put over my head and transferred to a cell. At the cell they asked me to strip but when I refused they tore my clothes and tied me up again. They then dragged me up a flight of stairs and when I could not move, they beat me repeatedly.


"When I reached the top of the stairs, they tied me up to some steel bars. They then hurled me human waste and urinated on me. Then they put a gun to my head and said that they would execute me there. Another soldier used a megaphone to shout abuses at me and this went on the whole night," Ali further recalled.

He said the next morning he was asked the names of resistance fighters in Iraq and when he replied that he did not know any, they inserted a jagged wooden stick into his rectum, followed by the barrel of a rifle, which caused him to bleed profusely.

"The next morning the interrogator came to my cell and tied me to the grille of the cell and then played the pop song 'By the Rivers of Babylon' continuously until the next morning. The effect on me was that I lost my hearing and lost my mind," he added.

On the 15th day of detention, Ali was given a blanket, in which he made a hole and used it to cover himself.

Soon after this, the former lecturer said he was forcefully placed on top of a carton box containing canned food, had wires connected to his fingers and ordered to stretch his hand out horizontally, and the electricity was switched on.



"As the electric current entered my whole body, I felt as if my eyes were being forced out and sparks were flying out. My teeth were clattering violently and my legs shaking violently as well. My whole body was shaking. I was electrocuted on three separate sessions,"
he said to pin-drop silence in the hall.

Throughout the torture, he said the interrogators would take photographs of him.

He said he was then left alone in the cell for 49 days, and during this period the torture stopped.

"At the end of the 49th day, I was transferred back to the tents and after 45 days at the tents, I was informed by a prisoner that he overheard some guards saying that I was wrongly arrested and that I would be released.

"I was released in the beginning of March, 2004. I was put into a truck and taken to a highway and then thrown out. A passing car stopped and took me home," he ended his tale.

To a question from the floor after his talk, he said only God kept him alive during his ordeal but the suffering he went through was only "a drop in the ocean"."

Deja Vu



Iraqization of War


Vietnamization of War

How Neocon Shiite Strategy Led to Sectarian War

Analysis by Gareth Porter

"WASHINGTON, Feb 6 (IPS) - The supreme irony of President George W. Bush's campaign to blame Iran for the sectarian civil war in Iraq, as well as attacks on U.S. forces, is that the Shiite militias who started to drive the Sunnis out of the Baghdad area in 2004 and thus precipitated the present sectarian crisis did so with the support of both Iran and the neoconservative U.S. war planners.

The U.S. policy decisions that led to the sectarian war can be traced back to the conviction of a group of right-wing zealots with close ties to Israel's Likud Party that overthrowing the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq would not destabilise the region, because Iraqi Shiites would be allies of the United States and Israel against Iran.

The idea that Iraqi Shiites could be used to advance U.S. power interests in the Middle East was part of a broader right-wing strategy for joint U.S.-Israeli "rollback" of Israel's enemies. In 1996, a task force at the right-wing Israeli think tank, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, under Richard Perle advised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that such a strategy should begin by taking control of Iraq and putting a pro-Israeli regime in power there.

Three years later, the former director of that think tank, David Wurmser, who had migrated to the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute, spelled out how the United States could use Iraqi Shiites to support that strategy in "Tyranny's Ally". Wurmser sought to refute the realist argument that overthrowing Saddam Hussein would destroy the balance of power between Sunni-controlled Iraq and Shiite Iran on which regional stability depended.

Wurmser proposed replacing the existing "dual containment" policy toward Iran and Iraq with what he called "dual rollback". He did not deny that taking down Hussein's regime would "generate upheaval in Iraq", but he welcomed that prospect, which would "offer the oppressed, majority Shiites of that country an opportunity to enhance their power and prestige."

Whereas the "realists" had assumed the Iraqi Shiites would be "Iran's fifth column", Wurmser argued that the Iraqi Shiite clerics would "present a challenge to Iran's influence and revolution." He cited their rejection of the central concept of the Iranian revolution of Ayatollah Khomeini -- the "rule of the jurisprudent" -- justifying clerical rule.

From that fact, Wurmser leaped to the conclusion that Iraqi Shiites would be an ally of the United States in promoting a "regional rollback of Shiite fundamentalism". Wurmser even suggested that Iraqi Shiites could help pry Lebanese Shiites, with whom they had enjoyed close ties historically, away from the influence of Hezbollah and Iran......."

Continue

Civil War or coup d’état in Palestine?


What role is the international community playing in the shootings? Is there a civil war going on in Palestine? Still, what is the relationship between sanctions and shootings? What is going to happen from now on?

By Agustin Velloso in Madrid
PalestineChronicle.com


"Is there a civil war going on in Palestine? No, but this question and an affirmative answer is what pro-Israeli media are disseminating all over the world. Hence, the average news consumer does not discuss the “reality” of the civil war.

But, are not we seeing that Palestinians are killing each other in Gaza streets?

What we are seeing is that since Hamas took power in the last legislative elections (January 2006), which were monitored by hundreds of foreign observers, Jimmy Carter amongst them, the Western powers have made all kind of political and economic maneuvers to oust the winner with the help of the loser, Abu Mazen and his Fatah party.

However, Palestine is not Iraq, there are no Western armies in Gaza, is it not an internal Palestinian affair?

It is not an internal affair. Palestine is just one more square of the big Middle East cheesboard. The international community plays in it to its advantage, namely: the control of oil and the support of its ally, Israel. The Western powers support Fatah because they say it represents the ‘moderate’ Palestinians and torpedo Hamas because its program does not fit with the Zionist and Imperialist agendas. Once Hamas obtained the majority of the Legislative Council seats, the powerful leaders, Bush, Rice, Blair, Olmert, Solana and others adopted plan B: to oust Hamas from government no matter the price (to be paid by rank and file Palestinians, of course)......

What is going to happen from now on?

There is ample room to be concerned. It has to be taken into account what Western countries –and their main ally, Israel- have been doing for years in the Middle East: the destruction of several countries, the death of millions and the suffering of many others.

The United States and Israel will keep on arming and funding the pro-cup party and its militias in order to sabotage the Palestinian project and foster instead the creative chaos they are so fond of. For Palestinians this means no return of the refugees, the continuation of the Occupation by close or remote control, the judaization of Jerusalem, the continuation of the ethnic cleansing by Israeli policies and the subjugation of millions of Palestinians in their own land. In any case, nothing different of what has been taking place since 1948."

-Agustín Velloso de Santisteban received his Ph.D. in Education from the Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain, where he is a lecturer in Comparative Education. He specialises in education in Palestine and education for refugees. He has been Visiting Fellow at London University, Reading University and Stanford University.

Documentary filmmaker says Iraq troops training may be arming America's enemies


"In an interview at Salon today, the maker of a forthcoming PBS documentary warns that America's efforts to "stand up" an Iraqi armed forces may be arming and training the very groups contributing to the country's instability.

Mark Smith, an award-winning television journalist, was interviewed by Salon's Alex Koppelman. His forthcoming documentary is called Gangs of Iraq and will air on PBS as part of its America at a Crossroads series. In the interview, Smith warned that the Mahdi Army, the Shi'a militia led by Moqtada al-Sadr, may be a primary beneficiary of the American effort to build a viable Iraqi security force.

"We're not training the Mahdi Army by intent, but we're providing training for people who may take our training program and then go join the militias," Smith told Koppelman. He added, "As early as August '04, there are photographs of uniformed Iraqi police celebrating with the Mahdi Army after a battle in Najaf."

Smith does not only single out the Mahdi Army. He also notes the heavy infiltration of the police by the Badr Corps, the militia of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq.

"There are numerous reports of whole units of Badr Corps coming intact into the ministry to work in the police forces," Smith warns.

Smith then suggests that this problem raises large questions about the focus on security forces training in US policy."

And What About The Palestinian Cause?


By Gilad Atzmon

"The Palestinian activist Reem Abdul Hadi, when asked for her opinion about Jewish anti-Zionist campaigners, said sarcastically: “they are very nice, all fifteen of them…”

I was rather happy to read in yesterday’s Guardian that; “A group of prominent British Jews will today declare independence from the country's Jewish establishment, arguing that it puts support for Israel above the human rights of Palestinians.”

It is indeed about time that Jewish people with influence in art, academia, business and the media raise their voices against Israel’s crimes and its supportive lobbies around the globe. It is rather crucial that Jewish people should openly succumb to true ethical and universal thinking rather than clannish monolithic discourse solely concerned with tribal maintenance.

Earlier today, I logged on to check out what the Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) have to say. If to be honest, though I found more than a few of my friends enlisted, I was rather disappointed with the views expressed by the group.

Once again it was an ‘image’ of moral thinking rather than an authentic ethical commitment. Once again it was a glorifying exposition of Jewish righteousness rather than simply acknowledging the Palestinian cause, i.e., the ‘right of return’. Disappointingly, the declaration wittingly avoids confronting the kernel of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Since it is rather established that the Palestinian cause is largely orientated around the mass expulsion of the indigenous Palestinians in 1948 and the failure to resolve the refugee catastrophe, avoiding the issue is nothing less than denying the Palestinians the most elementary human right: the right to live on one’s land. Avoiding the refugee issue is nothing less than dismissing the Palestinians of the most basic human rights.

In other words, when the JIV says “Human rights are universal and indivisible and should be upheld without exception. This is as applicable in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories as it is elsewhere,” what they really mean is “Human rights are universal as long as you are not a Palestinian who wants to return to his land.” I may admit that I find this approach rather disappointing. I would really love to believe that more than a few of the Jewish Independent Voices do agree with me on that one. I want to believe that they really fail to grasp what they were signing.

But the independent Jewish humanists do not stop just there; they also say “Palestinians and Israelis alike have the right to peaceful and secure lives.” This may be true. Yet somehow, it sounds to me too much like the highlight of Olmert’s speech. People are entitled to live in peace, nevertheless, the occupier and the colonialist cannot expect to live a secure life. I would even suggest that Jewish intellectuals who dismiss this crucial point might find it hard to secure their position as ‘independent ethical voices’.

The Independent Jewish Voices expect all sides as well to comply with ‘international law’. And I think to myself, in a world where America is a single superpower, international law and UN resolutions have very little to do with ethical thinking. Moreover, even the historically accepted 1947 partition resolution is non-ethical to the bone. Once again, I would expect the ethically orientated Independent Jews to stand out and promote ethical thinking rather than resolutions that are grounded by hegemony and military might.


Eventually, the prominent independent Jews spit it out. They are really against anti-Semitism. “The battle against anti-Semitism is vital and is undermined whenever opposition to Israeli government policies is automatically branded as anti-Semitic.”

While on the verge of complete dismay, I wonder, wouldn’t it be sufficient to just be against racism in general? Why is it that Jews who regard themselves as Independent Jewish Voices have to declare that fighting anti-Semitism is ‘vital’? The reason is simple. They insist upon not being seen as anti-Semites by their ‘less independent’ brothers. In other words, they, the independent voices, are far from being liberated. They are far from being independent. They are totally imbued within the Jewish discourse. And their message to the world is nothing more than the old two state solution.

I am not impressed."

لقاء مكة: فرص النجاح والفشل

عبد الباري عطوان

"حرص المتحدثون باسم الوفدين الفلسطينيين اللذين شدا الرحال الي مكة المكرمة للمشاركة في لقاء المصالحة الذي يرعاه العاهل السعودي الملك عبد الله بن عبد العزيز علي تأكيد نواياهم الطيبة، وحرصهم الاكيد علي انجاح هذا اللقاء بالتوصل الي اتفاق حول تشكيل حكومة وحدة وطنية تنهي حال الاحتقان، وتضع حدا للصدامات الدموية المؤسفة، ولكن يظل من السابق لأوانه الاغراق في التفاؤل، لأن النوايا الطيبة شيء، وما يحدث علي الارض شيء آخر مختلف جدا.
اللقاء في حد ذاته ينطوي علي درجة كبيرة من الاهمية، من حيث الزمان والمكان. فأي جهد عربي يصب في محصلة حقن الدماء ولملمة الشمل، وتخفيف معاناة الفلسطينيين تحت الاحتلال، هو جهد محمود، فما شهدته الاراضي العربية المحتلة من صدامات دامية اودت بحياة اكثر من اربعين فلسطينيا، هو امر مؤسف بكل المقاييس.
السؤال هو حول كيفية نجاح لقاء مكة فيما فشلت في انجازه لقاءات ووساطات سابقة وخاصة في غزة ودمشق والقاهرة. فالمسألة ليست مسألة لقاء وتبويس لحي، والقاء مواعظ مطولة حول حقن الدم الفلسطيني، وانما مناقشة الاسباب الحقيقية للخلافات التي قادت الي هذه النتائج المؤسفة، وايجاد حلول عملية لها.
مكة المكرمة استضافت لقاء مماثلا قبل شهرين لقيادات ومراجع عراقية من مختلف المذاهب والطوائف، وبحضور العاهل السعودي نفسه، ووسط مهرجانات اعلامية مماثلة، وجري الاتفاق علي وثيقة مكة التي كانت النقطة الاولي فيها تحريم سفك الدم العراقي، فماذا كانت النتيجة؟ المزيد من السيارات المفخخة واكثر من خمسة آلاف قتيل عراقي من مختلف الطوائف، وتصاعد الحرب الاهلية الطائفية.
الصدامات الفلسطينية ـ الفلسطينية هي اعراض جانبية لمرض خطير مزمن اسمه محاولة امريكية ـ اسرائيلية لإجهاض نتائج عملية ديمقراطية، ومنع حكومة منتخبة من الحكم، ومعاقبة شعب فلسطيني بأسره بسبب تصديق اكذوبة الديمقراطية الامريكية، واختيار ممثليه من خلال انتخابات نزيهة حرة وغير مسبوقة في الوطن العربي بأسره. وطالما ان الجهود منصبة حاليا علي معالجة الاعراض الجانبية، وليس العلة الاساسية، فإن مصير لقاء مكة الفلسطيني لن يكون افضل حالا من لقاء مكة العراقي.
الحكومات العربية ساهمت، كل حسب دوره وحجمه، في انفجار حال الاحتقان الداخلي الفلسطيني، عندما ساهمت في الحصار المالي الخانق المفروض علي الشعب الفلسطيني، وتخلت بطريقة مخجلة عن تعهدها الذي قطعته علي نفسها، في اجتماع لوزراء خارجية الدول العربية في القاهرة، بكسر هذا الحصار وعدم الالتزام به.
فاذا كانت هذه الحكومات عجزت عن فتح معبر لعلاج المرضي او عودة حجاج بيت الله الحرام في موعدهم، فهل ستنجح في ايصال الاموال والمساعدات للجائعين او المجوعين بقرار امريكي ـ اسرائيلي؟ لا نعتقد ذلك، والاجابة مكتوبة علي الحائط بوضوح.
ومع ذلك تظل هناك جوانب ايجابية لهذا اللقاء، اولها التقاء السيدين محمود عباس رئيس السلطة وخالد مشعل رئيس المكتب السياسي لحركة المقاومة الاسلامية حماس كندين متساويين في المكانة والثقل السياسي، وبدعوة من ملك عربي تردد طويلا في الاعتراف بحركة حماس او الالتقاء بأي من المسؤولين الكبار فيها. العاهل السعودي لم يلتق السيد مشعل قبل ذلك، وتجنب لقاء السيد محمود الزهار وزير الخارجية اثناء زيارته للرياض، وحتي عندما وجه دعوة الي السيد اسماعيل هنية رئيس الوزراء لزيارة المملكة وارسل له طائرة خاصة الي العريش، لم تكن دعوة رسمية، وانما لأداء فريضة الحج، حيث توجه دعوات عديدة لقيادات وزعامات سياسية وقبلية وحزبية اسلامية من مختلف انحاء العالم، يلتقون بالعاهل السعودي اثناء أداء مناسك الحج.
عقبتان اساسيتان حالتا دون توصل اللقاءات السابقة بين حركتي فتح و حماس الي اتفاق مصالحة ينهي حالة التوتر، ويسمح بتشكيل حكومة وحدة وطنية:
العقبة الاولي: رفض حركة حماس القبول بنص في خطاب التكليف بتشكيل الحكومة الجديدة، يؤكد علي الالتزام بالاتفاقات الموقعة من قبل السلطة، اي اتفاق اوسلو الذي ينص علي الاعتراف بالدولة العبرية.
العقبة الثانية: تنازل حركة حماس عن الوزارات السيادية لشخصيات مستقلة تسمي بعضها او توافق عليها بشرط مسبق الولايات المتحدة الامريكية، وخاصة منصبي وزير المالية ووزير الداخلية.
حماس ابدت استعدادا لاستبدال كلمة التزام بكلمة احترام وأصرت علي عدم قبول اي اسماء لوزراء يفرضون من قبل جهات خارجية، وامريكية علي وجه التحديد.
وما زال السؤال المطروح في هذا الخصوص هو عما اذا كان السيد مشعل سيتنازل في مكة عما رفض التنازل عنه في دمشق، حيث حلفاؤه السوريون الخلص، اي القبول بكلمة التزام والتخلي عن الاحترام وفي حال تقديمه هذا التنازل الذي يعني الاعتراف باسرائيل، ماذا سيحصل في المقابل؟
بمعني آخر هل سيلغي اتفاق مكة في حال التوصل اليه الخطط الامريكية التي رصدت 128 مليون دولار لتعزيز حرس الرئاسة الفلسطيني ورفع تعداده الي اكثر من عشرة آلاف شخص وتنظيف قوات الامن الوطني الفلسطينية البالغ تعدادها 40 الفا من كل العناصر التي تؤمن بالمقاومة او تتعاطف معها، تحت ذريعة اعادة تأهيل هذه القوات.
وفي حال الاتفاق علي تسمية وزراء الوزارات السيادية هل سيوضع الحرس الرئاسي والمعابر وقوات الامن العام وجهازا المخابرات والامن الوقائي تحت امرة وزير الداخلية الجديد، وبصلاحيات مطلقة؟ وما هو مصير القوة التنفيذية التي اسستها وزارة داخلية حماس لتكون ميليشيا موازية لميليشيات الرئاسة ومستشاريها الامنيين؟
الشعب الفلسطيني كله يتطلع الي نجاح لقاء مكة، ولكن لا بد من توفر الأسس اللازمة لهذا النجاح، ويمكن تلخيصها في النقاط التالية:
اولا: ان تسلم حركة حماس بانها لا يمكن ان تجمع بين السلطة والمعارضة في الوقت نفسه، وتحمل بطيختي المقاومة والحكومة الثقيلتين والمتناقضتين، فلا بد من اسقاط احداهما، فإما القبول بالحكومة وهذا يتطلب القبول بشروطها كاملة، وإما التمسك بالمقاومة وتحمل كل تبعاتها.
شخصيا كنت اتمني لو ان حماس لم تخض الانتخابات التشريعية، وان تتنازل عن تشكيل الحكومة فور الفوز فيها، بعد ان تبين ان هناك انقلابا ضدها، يريد افشالها وعقاب الشعب الفلسطيني بسببها. فلو فعلت حماس ذلك لتضاعفت شعبيتها في اوساط الفلسطينيين في الداخل والخارج.
ثانيا: ان تسلم قيادة حركة فتح بانها خسرت السلطة بسبب فسادها، وليس فساد الحركة، وان عليها ان تتنحي جانبا لطرف ثالث مقبول، وتطهر نفسها من السياسات التي تبنتها اخيرا عندما ربطت نفسها بالمشروع الامريكي، وقبلت ان تتحول الي كونترا فلسطينية، ودون اي مقابل ملموس علي صعيد تحقيق الحد الأدني من المطالب الفلسطينية.
من الصعب ان نري حركة حماس تنسحب من الحكومة وتسلمها بطريقة مباشرة او غير مباشرة للطرف الآخر او من يدورون في فلكه، بعد كل ما حدث من صدامات وصمود في وجه الحصارين الامريكي منه والعربي، ومن المستحيل ان نصدق ان الرئيس عباس سيدير ظهره بالكامل للسيدة كوندوليزا رايس و محور المعتدلين الذي اسسته ويتوقف عن عناق ايهود اولمرت ومطالبته باستئناف المفاوضات. ويعيد حركة فتح الي منابعها الاولي كحركة كفاح وطني.
ثم من يضمن، في حال التوصل الي اتفاق، ان تلتزم به القوي الاقليمية، وتسهل تنفيذه، ونقصد هنا سورية ومصر وايران وهي القوي التي تشعر بحساسية مطلقة تجاه خسارة الورقة الفلسطينية لطرف آخر.
نعم نحن غير متفائلين ليس لاننا لا نريد نجاح مؤتمر مكة، ولكن لاننا نري ان المسألة اكثر تعقيدا من المصافحة والعناق امام كاميرات التلفزة في حضور العاهل السعودي. فنحن امام رأسين يتناطحان من اجل الفوز بسلطة وهمية، ولن يتوقف هذا النطاح الذي تحول اخيرا الي معارك دموية، حتي يفوز كبش ويهزم الآخر.
ونأمل ان نكون مخطئين."

Can Anything Good Come From These Two Stooges?