Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Israel targeted Iranian weapons in Syria - report


"CNN news network reported Tuesday evening that the incident in which Israeli planes reportedly invaded Syrian airspace was actually an attack on Iranian weapons transferred to Syria.

According to the report, the incident involved an aerial operation that also included ground forces that were meant to mark targets or inspect the damage caused by the attack.

It was also reported that the operation left "a great hole in the ground" in the Syrian desert. The report was based mainly on sources in the American government and CNN said that Israel was satisfied with the operation's results.

The report said Israel apparently targeted a type of weapon transferred through Syria to Hizbullah from Iran.

Sources told CNN reporter Christiana Amanpour that weapons have been transferred in this way for the past three or four years uninterruptedly......"

***

Have the first shots in the attacks on Hizbullah, Syria and Iran been fired? Sure sounds like it.

Ready to return with nothing

Matthew Cassel writing from Baddawi refugee camp, Live from Lebanon, Sep 11, 2007

"It took over three months, but in the end the Lebanese army claimed victory over Fatah al-Islam, the previously unheard of non-Palestinian, al-Qaida-inspired group that had established itself in the Nahr al-Bared Palestinian refugee camp in northern Lebanon. On Tuesday, 4 September 2007, outside the entrance to the destroyed camp the Lebanese army massed together to begin what would be a 10-hour-long parade from Nahr al-Bared to Beirut just over 50 miles away.

Meanwhile, Palestinian refugees displaced from Nahr al-Bared staying in the nearby Baddawi refugee camp watched the parade live on television. Many cursed the images they saw of the Lebanese army celebrating their achievement. A young medical volunteer entered the room and as he watched the TV said, "You know, two Palestinians from Nahr al-Bared were taken yesterday by the army and beaten when they were near Nahr al-Bared. They're in the hospital now."......

Abu Yasser showing where he was beaten and whipped with metal chains by the Lebanese army.


Abu Yasser showing the scars on his wrists where the army attached metal bracelets and electrocuted him.

Next year marks the 60th anniversary of the year when three-quarters of the Palestinian population were forced from their historic lands and ended up in places like the Nahr al-Bared refugee camp. Still unable to return to their homeland, the refugees from Nahr al-Bared are probably the only people in the world demanding the right to return to a refugee camp.

The discussion surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is narrowly focused on the issue of the occupation in the West Bank and Gaza. The rights of Palestinian refugees have almost entirely dropped off the radar. It's clear that Israel, unwilling to even give up its illegal settlements built on Palestinian land in the West Bank, will certainly not acknowledge or grant the Palestinians' right to return despite numerous UN resolutions reaffirming this right.

The destruction of the Nahr al-Bared Palestinian refugee camp is reminder that it is time to refocus the discourse and include the Palestinian refugees of 1948 and 1967, when as many as 250,000 Palestinians were displaced, many for a second time. Their human dignity not respected, Palestinian refugees are and have been vulnerable to treatment like that which Abu Yasser suffered while detained by the Lebanese army. They enjoy no rights, have no representative government, no passport, no home in which they can comfortably live. They have only one right to which they cling -- the right to return to Palestine.

As Hajj Mousa explained, "If we could return to Palestine, all of us [in Lebanon] would leave everything we have here and return with nothing just as we came here in 1948.""

Latest From Dr. Mona El-Farra in Gaza


"Since my return from the USA and my mother’s death I have not felt a strong desire to write.

At the moment I am passing deeply through my grief. Every morning I think that the telephone will ring and it will be her regular morning call. I feel that an important pillar of my humanitarian structure has collapsed. I know I need some time to restore my balance to be able to cope with her absence; she was always my great inspiration and support with her endless tender loving care.

It was too hard for me not to be able to say goodbye. It was hard to know that I was not allowed to reach her because of some tiny lousy scrap of paper, another fragment in the saga of closed borders, occupation and the long history of Palestinian suffering - one generation after another since the foundation of Israel and the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948, and later on in 1967 the occupation of what was left of historic Palestine - Gaza and the West Bank......

Every day patients are prevented from leaving Gaza for further treatment abroad. Some cross the borders but the majority do not. Dozens of essential medications are missing from hospital shelves, poverty is severely prevalent, 85% of the population depend on international aid agencies’ food distribution. Essential foods for a balanced diet, like meat, vegetables, fruit, milk are missing from the domestic basket - either because people cannot afford to buy them, or because they are not
even in the market.

Most of the time we do not have regular power supply or sufficient water. The occupation decides what we should eat and what we should not, what we should wear and what we should not, they interfere in the very tiny details of our daily life, by imposing so many rules and regulation (under the security pretense), they decide your children’s eye colors in case you enjoy peace of mind with healthy intimate personal relationships. The Palestinian situation in Gaza is economical and political strangulation.

We have become a small piece of news, not enough to disturb the world’s
sleeping conscience
.......

We don’t know the way out of this situation where Hamas controls Gaza and Fatah controls the West Bank. And now people’s daily talk is of salaries, closure and sanctions, whereas the main Palestinian issues -- self-determination, end of the occupation, right of return – are off the agenda. No-one shows concern or even speaks of them at the moment. The occupation has achieved its long-term goal, hungry fighting people can’t think straight.

This is the strategy of the occupation supported by the Western powers. As
a national liberation movement, we fell into the trap of authority so foolishly; it is time for both parties to get on the right track towards our liberation and independence
......"

The Fakery of General Petraeus: What Iraqis Think About the Surge

By PATRICK COCKBURN
CounterPunch

"At first sight the Petraeus report looks as if it is going to be one of those spurious milestones in the war in Iraq, (like the Iraq Study Group’s report last December), heavily publicized at the time, but not affecting the political and military stalemate in the country.

Unfortunately, the propaganda effort by the White House now underway may have a more malign impact than most propaganda exercises. It claims that victory is possible where failure has already occurred. It manipulates figures and facts to produce a picture of Iraq that is not merely distorted but substantively false......."

'The US Will Lose War Regardless What it Does'


In an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE, American military historian Gabriel Kolko argues that the situation in Iraq is worse than ever and that the artificial nation, created after World War I, is breaking up. The "surge," he says, is also failing.

"......SPIEGEL: How does Washington plan to go about the business of ending the war?

KOLKO: There is utter confusion in Washington about how to end this morass. Goals are similar but the means to attain them are increasingly changing, confused, and as victory becomes more elusive so too does this administration look pathetic. The 'surge' in the opinion of a majority of quite conservative Establishment foreign policy experts (80 percent of whom had once served in government) was failing; the administration's handling of the war, in their view, was dismal. In fact, it is disastrous."

US may attack, but will Iran fight back?

By Alan G Jamieson
Asia Times

".......As in Iraq in 2003, the US plan for a military attack on Iran presupposes that once the enemy has suffered a massive initial blow he will accept the inevitable and surrender. In Iraq, the conventional armed forces were easily broken, but the unconventional war with local insurgents and militias is still raging more than four years later. Similarly, the Iranian armed forces might be severely damaged by America's aerial assault, but the IRGC and other less conventional forces might continue the struggle in Iraq, in Iran's borderlands, and in the waters of the Persian Gulf for years to come. Fears of the "Shi'ite crescent" will have given birth to an arc of war stretching from Palestine to Pakistan. "

Anti-Iran hype reaches fever pitch


By Khody Akhavi
Asia Times

"WASHINGTON - On the same day General David Petraeus presented his much-anticipated progress report to the US Congress on the US military's "troop surge" strategy in Iraq, neo-conservative ideologues associated with the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) took aim at another of the reputed foes of "freedom" - the Islamic Republic of Iran.

During a panel discussion on Monday aimed at promoting his new book The Iranian Time Bomb, Michael Ledeen, a resident scholar at AEI, criticized the "evil" nature of Iran's clerical regime, its support for international terrorism, and the need to back Iranian dissidents and activists in a soft revolution to dislodge the mullahs from power.

Along with the broad - and at times mocking - generalizations about Iran's attempts to foment "Islamic totalitarianism" throughout the world, Ledeen, accompanied by former Central Intelligence Agency director James Woolsey and Clifford D May, president of the hawkish Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, appeared dead set against any diplomatic engagement with Iran.

"The [Iranian] leadership constantly tells its people, 'The Iranian people must prepare to rule the world,'" said Ledeen.

"Everybody has convinced themselves that they can make a deal with Iran. We have been negotiating for 27 years, as if there have been no negotiations ... there is no escape," he said. "The only question is how best to defeat them.".......

It appears Iran will remain a target for AEI ideologues and their associates in the months to come. The question remains as to whether this aggressive pseudo-policy will yield productive results, or if it will end, as many in the international community fear, in military confrontation.

The panelists at Monday's discussion left little room for compromise, and their generalizations about Iran as an irrational actor support a very clear and consistent neo-conservative message: there can be no negotiation with Iran.

In the final analysis, military confrontation with Iran becomes a foregone conclusion. "

Syria and Israel flirt with war

By Sami Moubayed
Asia Times

"......Israel also declared that one of its famous units, the Golan Brigade, had just completed intensive training in war games. Guy Hazoot, the officer in charge of the 91st Division deployed along the border with Lebanon, noted: "The worst case is war, and we have to be prepared for the worst case."

The Jerusalem Post added that if war were to break out with Syria, it would be many times worse for Israel than its confrontation with Hezbollah in 2006. While all of that was coming out of Israel, raising red alerts, there were also contradicting gestures by Israeli officials.

One came from deputy chief of staff of the IDF, Major-General Moshe Kaplinsky, who said: "I hear the voice, but to the best of our assessment, which is also my personal assessment, we do not expect a war this summer from Syria." Israel's mobilization on the Syrian border was in response to Syrian troop movements, he added, calling it a "defensive" measure.

United Press International, however, quoted "well-informed sources in Washington" saying that a "confrontation between Syria and Israel may happen this summer". This was echoed by Dennis Ross, a Middle East envoy of the era of US president Bill Clinton, who was quoted in the online version of Yediot Aharonot as saying there was a serious "risk" of war between both countries, adding, "The Syrians are positioning themselves for war."

At this stage, all options are on the table, although a political decision for war has not been reached by either country because war would be devastating to the already troubled Middle East......."

By Tom Toles

The erasing of Iraq


It's a tried-and-tested torture technique: strike fear into your victims, deprive them of cherished essentials and then eradicate their memories. In 2003, the US applied this on an enormous scale for its invasion of Iraq. And then, after Saddam's regime crumbled, Washington set out to rebuild the traumatised country through a disastrous programme of privatisation and unfettered capitalism, as Naomi Klein shows in this exclusive extract from her new book

Naomi Klein
Tuesday September 11, 2007

Guardian

".....Which, of course, requires more blasting - upping the dosage, holding down the button longer, more pain, more bombs, more torture. Former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage, who had predicted that Iraqis would be easily marshalled from A to B, has since concluded that the real problem was that the US was too soft. "The humane way in which the coalition fought the war," he said, "actually has led to a situation where it is more difficult to get people to come together, not less. In Germany and Japan [after the second world war], the population was exhausted and deeply shocked by what had happened, but in Iraq it's been the opposite. A very rapid victory over enemy forces has meant we've not had the cowed population we had in Japan and Germany ... The US is dealing with an Iraqi population that is un-shocked and un-awed." By January 2007, Bush and his advisers were still convinced that they could gain control of Iraq with one good "surge". The report on which the surge strategy was based aimed for "the successful clearing of central Baghdad"......

This was not what the Bush administration intended for Iraq when it was selected as the model nation for the rest of the Arab world. The occupation had begun with cheerful talk of clean slates and fresh starts. It didn't take long, however, for the quest for cleanliness to slip into talk into "pulling Islamism up from the root" in Sadr City or Najaf and removing "the cancer of radical Islam" from Fallujah and Ramadi - what was not clean would be scrubbed out by force.

That is what happens with projects to build model societies in other people's countries. The cleansing campaigns are rarely premeditated. It is only when the people who live on the land refuse to abandon their past that the dream of the clean slate morphs into its doppelgänger, the scorched earth - only then that the dream of total creation morphs into a campaign of total destruction.

The unanticipated violence that now engulfs Iraq is the creation of the lethally optimistic architects of the war - it was preordained in that original seemingly innocuous, even idealistic phrase, "a model for a new Middle East". The disintegration of Iraq has its roots in the ideology that demanded a tabula rasa on which to write its new story. And when no such pristine tableau presented itself, the supporter of that ideology proceeded to blast and surge and blast again in the hope of reaching that promised land."

Delaying the inevitable withdrawal

Today's testimony by Petraeus and Crocker used mysterious methodology and trivial indicators to inflate Republican hopes and keep US troops in Iraq.

By Matthew Yglesias
The Guardian

"For a highly anticipated event, the Monday testimony of General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker before the US House of Representatives proved strikingly anticlimactic. Everything the top military and civilian officials respectively in Iraq had to say had been thoroughly leaked and debated during the previous week......

Still, one can't help but wonder if the Republicans aren't like the cartoon coyote who already ran off the cliff and just hasn't realized it yet. Despite the high regard in which Petraeus is held by the American media, polls taken show that most citizens expect his testimony this week to be designed to mislead. Meanwhile, the GOP is in denial about the fact that even those experts who think Iraq might yet be saved see it as a process that could require more than a decade.

Instead, after six months of dodging questions about Iraq by saying we should wait for Petraeus' report in September, the new story is that we need to ... wait six more months to evaluate things then. And in March, we can expect the can to be kicked six months further down the road......."

The ball is in Fatah’s court

Comment by Khalid Amayreh

"The democratically-elected Palestinian Prime Minister Ismael Haniya and the rest of the Hamas leadership are making every conceivable effort to end the crisis with the Fatah organization despite the latter’s conspiratorial working relations with Israel, the US and certain puppet regimes in the region.

The real aim of these efforts, it should be stressed, is not to have an amicable relationship with American-backed Fatah leaders, but rather to preserve the paramount interests of the Palestinian people, which Israel, in league with the US and certain treacherous regional players are trying to liquidate under the disguise of the so-called “peace process.”

Indeed, despite Fatah’s obvious connivance with Israel and its guardian-ally, the United States, against Hamas, the legitimate Palestinian Prime Minister, Haniya, has once again expressed his readiness to meet with and reach out to PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas in Makka in a fresh effort to rebuild Palestinian unity.......

Our people are neither stupid nor naïve, and they certainly know who is sincere and who is not, who is truly serving the interests of the people and who is carrying out foreign agendas, and who is clean and who is corrupt.

Yes, there are many sincere people within Fatah who know what is going on within their organization whose current leadership has been steadily trying to morph the Palestinian issue from a national struggle against a Nazi-like Israeli occupation to a showdown between Hamas and Fatah. To the chagrin of many, however, these sincere people within Fatah are powerless to correct the suicidal course chosen by such people as Mahmoud Abbas, Nabil Amr and Muhammed Dahlan, the very people the Bush administration had sought to impose on the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.

Reforming Fatah, by excluding those elements that are at Israel’s beck and call, and reasserting commitment to the long-held national constants, should be a key goal toward the restoration of Palestinian national unity. After all, it would be difficult to conduct a sincere dialogue with people who lack sincerity and good will.

Reforming Fatah is Fatah’s business, not Hamas’s. But it is Hamas’s and every Palestinian’s business to see to it that Fatah remain committed to the national constants and not morph into another “village league” under the false rubric of fighting “the coup makers” (well, who has carried out a coup against whom?).......

The ball is in Fatah’s court, not in Hamas’s. Fatah has to choose one of two choices, either to serve the national interests of the Palestinian people or please and appease Israel and the US. It can’t choose both. "

Monday, September 10, 2007

60 IOF troops hurt in Qassam strike on base



"At least 60 Israel Defense Forces soldiers were wounded in the early hours of Tuesday morning when a Qassam rocket fired from the Gaza Strip struck an IDF basic training base near Kibbutz Zikkim, about 1 kilometer inside Israeli territory.

According to Army Radio, the rocket hit an empty tent used only in the daytime for administrative purposes.

While ten of the wounded were in moderate condition, the majority were lightly injured, suffering from minor injuries or shock......."

Habila Keeps Begging to Talk to the Traitor


Officials: Haniyeh proposes he meet with Abbas in Mecca

"The head of the Hamas government in Gaza, Ismail Haniyeh, proposed Monday that he meet with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas in Saudi Arabia, Haniyeh's office said Monday.

Since Hamas' forcible takeover of Gaza in June, Abbas has rebuffed repeated offers by the Islamic militants to resume contacts, saying Hamas must first apologize and withdraw its forces from Palestinian security posts in Gaza.

Abbas is under strong international pressure, particularly from the U.S., not to renew talks with Hamas, which has refused to recognize Israel or accept previous peace accords.

Haniyeh, who was deposed as prime minister by Abbas in June, proposed the meeting in a phone call with Saudi Crown Prince Sultan Ibn Abdel Aziz, Haniyeh's office said.

Abbas is scheduled to visit Saudi Arabia on Tuesday. Haniyeh's office said in the statement that Hamas is ready to return to dialogue without conditions and described factional fighting that preceded the Hamas takeover as a "disagreement among brothers"......."

***

I am afraid that the Palestinians will keep on muddling with mediocre politics, mediocre "leaders" and mediocre resistance until there is no Palestine left to fight for. Sadly, this has been the pattern for the past 60 years and it seems that nothing has been learned.

US surge has failed - Iraqi poll

About 70% of Iraqis believe security has deteriorated in the area covered by the US military "surge" of the past six months, an opinion poll suggests.

"The survey by the BBC, ABC News and NHK of more than 2,000 people across Iraq also suggests that nearly 60% see attacks on US-led forces as justified.

This rises to 93% among Sunni Muslims compared to 50% for Shia......"

LEBANON: Local people against rebuilding of Palestinian refugee camp


UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

"BIBNIN, 10 September 2007 (IRIN).......

“Why should we rebuild the camp?”

The government has pledged to rebuild the camp and is hosting a donor conference on 10 September in coordination with the Palestinian relief organisation, UNRWA, to raise money for Nahr al-Bared’s reconstruction.

However, problems of unexploded ordnance, unsafe buildings and the danger of disease inside the devastated camp will take many months to overcome before reconstruction can even begin, and the government is now facing a growing chorus of anger from local residents such as Rawa Fiyad, who say they do not want to see Nahr al-Bared rebuilt at all.

“Why should we rebuild the camp? The Palestinians brought destruction to this area, so let another, wealthier country host them,” she said.

“The Palestinians protected Fatah al-Islam in their camp and they took money from them,” said `mukhtar’ (local official) Jamal Abu Khalil, who said he nearly died after being shot by a sniper from inside the camp. “They are betrayers, so we decided as civilians that we will fight the Palestinians - and the Lebanese army if they try and rebuild the camp.”

Palestinian leaders in Lebanon have roundly condemned Fatah al-Islam, which broke from Damascus-based Palestinian group Fatah Intifada in November last year. Among dozens of former residents of Nahr al-Bared interviewed since April by IRIN on the subject of Fatah al-Islam, none supported the group......"

Fmr. President Jimmy Carter on “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid,” Iraq, Greeting the Shah of Iran at the White House, Selling Weapons to Indonesia Duri


Democracy Now!
With Amy Goodman

"In his first interview with Democracy Now!, former President Jimmy Carter talks about what led him to write “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid”, his controversial book that argues Israel’s settlements in the Occupied Territories are the main barrier to peace. Carter also discusses his regrets over sending arms to Indonesia during the occupation of East Timor and recounts his dealings with the Shah of Iran. The 39th president also assesses the Iraq war and reflects on the 25th anniversary of the Carter Center, which has focused on election monitoring and health initiatives around the world.....

AMY GOODMAN: President Carter, I wanted to switch gears to talk about the raging controversy over your book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.

JIMMY CARTER: I didn’t know it was still raging, but that’s interesting.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, it raged for a while, and now the book is coming out on paperback with a new afterword. And you dealt with that, you talked about it being perhaps the most controversial thing that you’ve done, maybe, to your surprise. So, start with the title. Talk about the message you’re trying to put out with this book.

JIMMY CARTER: Well, the message is very clear. It deals with Palestine, not inside Israel itself, just the Palestinian Occupied Territories. And the second word is “peace.” I describe in this book the efforts for peace so far and my formula, which I think is very reasonable, for bringing peace to Israel and to Israel's neighbors. And I repeat that over and over with a strong condemnation of any kind of terrorism that afflicts innocent people by the actions of either the Palestinians or the Israelis.

And the word “apartheid” is exactly accurate. You know, this is an area that’s occupied by two powers. They are now completely separated. Palestinians can't even ride on the same roads that the Israelis have created or built in Palestinian territory. The Israelis never see a Palestinian, except the Israeli soldiers. The Palestinians never see an Israeli, except at a distance, except the Israeli soldiers. So within Palestinian territory, they are absolutely and totally separated, much worse than they were in South Africa, by the way. And the other thing is, the other definition of “apartheid” is, one side dominates the other. And the Israelis completely dominate the life of the Palestinian people.

AMY GOODMAN: Why don't Americans know what you have seen?

JIMMY CARTER: Americans don't want to know and many Israelis don't want to know what is going on inside Palestine. It's a terrible human rights persecution that far transcends what any outsider would imagine. And there are powerful political forces in America that prevent any objective analysis of the problem in the Holy Land. I think it’s accurate to say that not a single member of Congress with whom I’m familiar would possibly speak out and call for Israel to withdraw to their legal boundaries or to publicize the plight of the Palestinians or even to call publicly and repeatedly for good faith peace talks......"

طيران أميريكي، طيارون صهاينة


وقصف من"الخارجية" العربية لسوريا

An Important Analysis (Arabic)
د. عادل سمارة

"ليست هذه تسمية رمزية للعدوان، كما اسمى البعض فلسطين وطناً رمزياً. بل هذا حديث واقعي جداً ولكن باستفزاز لأنه مستَفَّز بلا شك.
قبل اربعة ايام، سألني مرسلا قناتي العالم و (أل.بي.سي) عن رفض أولمرت تقديم مرونات للفلسطينيين في رام الله. واشرت إلى أن هم إسرائيل ألأساس هو العدوان على سوريا وإيران وحزب الله، والمقاومة الفلسطينية وباقي التحركات والأحاديث مجرد حواشٍ للموضوع المركزي.
أمس قال وزراء الخارجية العرب، بلا خجل، إن على سوريا ولبنان حضور المؤتمر الذي "أمر" به جورج بوش! لأن أنظمة وزراء الخارجية العرب ستكون في حرج شديد، وهي ليست عاوزة، إذا غابت سوريا ولبنان بما هما القطرين الذين على صدغي بوابة الصمود والممانعة والمقاومة. فغيابهما سيكون فضيحة وإحراجاً. كما أن الولايات المتحدة بلا شك تضغط على من هم وراء وزراء الخارجية كي يضغطوا على سوريا للمشاركة.
هنا يتمظهر المستوى النفسي، فالوزراء يقولون بوجوب حضور سوريا، وهذا بحد ذاته إضعاف معنوي للشعب العربي في سوريا، والعدو يعتدي، وكأن الرسالة إلى المواطن السوري، أن ليس أمامك إلا أن تطلب من نظامك الإستسلام!
العدوان الصهيوني اساساً جاء كتنفيذ عسكري للدعوة السياسية من وزراء الخارجية العرب. ولا يهم إسرائيل ابداً أن هذا يحرج الحكام العرب، فكل عربي عدو، حتى من وقف عمره وعرشه لخدمتها، فالعرب قاع الأغيار.
إسرائيل الموتورة من تموز 2006، والولايات المتحدة المفجوعة بربيبتها، حارسة خط تدفق التراكم، لم ولن تغفر لسوريا دعمها لحزب الله. ولذا، ما أن زار بوش العراق، وهي زيارة تسلل، تشير إلى عنف المقاومة، وعجز الوحش عن حماية نابه العقائدي، ما أن زار العراق حيث استمع بالضبط لما سمعه المالكي من سوريا، حتى قرر تحريك موظفه في تل ابيب.
هناك مؤشرات عدة على "وجوب" العدوان. صحيح أن هناك اساساً وظيفة الكيان الدائمة، لا سيما طالما المقاومة في العراق تدوّخ الوحش الأميركي، واتهام سوريا بأنها تدعم المقاومة العراقية، وهناك محاولة النهوض الروسية، وتسليح سوريا ووصول خبراء إلى دمشق، والحديث عن غواصات روسية في شمال سوريا، وهي منطقة الخرق الصهيوني. وهناك محاولة اختبار طبيعة الأسلحة الجديدة، وهناك الشعور السياسي الأميركي بتهالك العملاء السوريين وتحديداً المعرضة التي على شاكلة العراقيين الذين دخلوا على دبابات إبرامز".
وهناك الإشكالات اللبنانية سواء "الثأر" الأميركي للحريري، وربما هي قاتلته، وتجربة نهر البارد، وتماسك المعارضة الوطنية اللبنانية.
وهناك الحكام العرب الذين وصلوا حالة "الإستواء" للتسوية مع الكيان، وبالتالي لا بد من تركيع سوريا. كل هذه مجتمعة تجعل العدوان على سوريا، "ضرورة" من هذا الصف العدواني الواسع.
هل يتسع العدوان، هل يتكرر، ماذا ستفعل سوريا، كل هذه اسئلة حارقة وهامة، لكن الأهم هو فقط: أن العدوان مؤكد وسيتكرر. هذا حجر الزاوية."

Screwing Up In Iraq

"Bad Management" or Doomed from the Start?

By SAUL LANDAU and FARRAH HASSEN
CounterPunch

"......After two hours of testimony on bungling, we thought of historian Gabriel Kolko's observation: wars don't turn out the way they are supposed to. "Are you telling me that's the best America can do?" asks dejected-looking Lieutenant Seth Moulton.

The answer is "yes."

In Vietnam, the U.S. military killed 4 million Vietnamese and lost the war. Rather than continuing to debate about who will better "manage" Iraq, Democratic presidential aspirants should consider the Iraq war in light of wars in Korea and Vietnam and rethink their assessment of war-making itself."

Israel tried to attack Syria, says Bishara

""Israel not only invaded Syrian airspace, but apparently tried to execute some sort of secret strategic operation," said former Knesset Member Azmi Bishara in an article published on a Syrian website Monday.

Bishara, who fled Israel after he was suspected of aiding Hizbullah operatives during the Second Lebanon War, said he believed the Israeli Air Force attempted an attack on Syria and was not just trying to send a message. "Israel counted on Syria opting to keep (the invasion) quiet, rather than admit it happened," said Bishara.

"Based on (Israel's) recent statements regarding Russia's deployment in Syria, the purpose of the operation was apparently a strike on antiaircraft missile facilities or on other ground targets.

"This could also have been an attempt to expose a breach in Syrian radar, allowing somehow to make way to Iran. This, of course, was impossible without Turkey's cooperation which the Israelis didn't seem to have. Either that or Turkey was flustered when IAF fuel tanks were found in its territory, prompting it to ask for an official explanation.

Scoring military gain

"Without getting carried away," continued Bishara, "this was a full blown aerial operation and we are treading on dangerous ground. "We have to make sure Israel doesn't start a war with Syria or Lebanon and there is still a chance it would try to strike against one of them, for the sake of scoring military gain," he warned......"

The New Palestinian Village League Receiving Weekly Instructions in Jerusalem

The man with the dyed beard returns

By Ramzy Baroud
Asia Times

"The reappearance, after an interlude of more than two years, of Osama bin Laden will be chewed over endlessly by pundits who will mostly miss the point. It isn't bin Laden and his dyed beard that should be flashing on our TV screens but the disgraced faces of those who exploited the tragedy of a stricken nation to inflict tragedies on others...."

Abbas' Village League


A Good Article

By Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, Sep 10, 2007

"For as long Palestinians have resisted violent Israeli policies against them, successive Israeli governments have tried to undermine Palestinian unity and foment divisions. A principal strategy has been to try to foster alternative leaders willing to abandon fundamental Palestinian demands for justice and focus on an agenda with which Israel is comfortable.

This is taking place now as Israel shuns the elected Hamas movement, and tries to prop up the discredited Fatah leadership headed by Mahmoud Abbas. Following the elections, Israel kidnapped dozens of elected officials belonging to Hamas and is still holding them in its prisons......

Just as it has done with Hamas leaders more recently, Israel dismissed the PLO mayors, expelling many of them into exile. In 1980 the mayors of Hebron and Halhoul were deported and the mayors of Nablus and Ramallah were severely maimed by car bombs planted by Israeli death squads. In March 1982, Israel occupation authorities dismissed all elected Palestinian mayors and city councils.....

.....So began a slow decline until Arafat died under mysterious circumstances in November 2004. Arafat was replaced by the current Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who had long enjoyed explicit backing from Washington and who was the key Palestinian figure in the secret channel that led to Oslo.

Abbas is now explicitly armed and backed by Israel and the United States and has declared war on the Hamas movement. We can reach back to another precedent to understand his current role. Following the debacle (from Israel's perspective) of the 1976 municipal elections, it set up the Village Leagues in the 1980s. These were bodies staffed by Palestinian collaborators appointed by Israel.

Unlike the National Guidance Committee and many of the officials elected in 1976, the Village Leagues did not struggle against the occupation. While Israel attempted to suppress an authentic Palestinian national movement and uproot the influence of the PLO, the Village Leagues were an attempt to impose an Israeli form of limited autonomy. The Village League of the Hebron district was established in 1979, headed by former Jordanian Cabinet Minister Mustafa Dudin. In 1981, two more leagues were established in Ramallah and Bethlehem districts. Some members of the Village Leagues had criminal histories.

Because of their willingness to collaborate, Village League leaders were given a facilitator role by Israel; money was channeled through them and they received various benefits from the Israeli rulers. Through a series of military orders, the Leagues were authorized by Israel to arrest and detain political activists and establish armed militias, as well as carry out administrative and bureaucratic tasks such as issuing drivers' licenses. Palestinians living in rural areas had to turn to the Village Leagues for everything from work permits to family reunification permits.....

Israel hoped that the Village Leagues would create and empower a "moderate" Palestinian leadership that would then to agree to negotiate with Israel on the subject of "autonomy" -- a code word for limited self-rule under continued Israeli occupation and colonization. The leagues were designed to provide a "moderate" Palestinian leadership that would be prepared to negotiate with Israel on the subject of autonomy for the West Bank. For that same purpose the Palestinian Authority was established and it is for this reason that Abbas is currently allowed to talk with Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

There is a disturbing parallel with current Israeli policy: just as Israel now uses the Abbas-dominated militias of the Palestinian Authority to crack down on those who resist the occupation, Israel attempted to do the same with the Village Leagues. Members of the Village Leagues had little hesitation when it came to the use of force: they manned roadblocks, carried out checks on identity cards and broke up meetings and demonstrations against the occupation.

It is not known how many members the Leagues had and how much support it received. What is known is that Village League leaders were widely viewed as corrupt, dishonest and having accepted an Israeli definition of the problem. The aims of the Leagues were, in the words of the Hebron district Village League leader Mohammad Nasser: "to improve relations with Israel, to prevent terrorism, to combat communism and to work for the establishment of peace and democracy." If one replaces the words "communism" with "Islamic extremism" then one has a description that matches almost exactly the stated goals of the Abbas leadership even as it cracks down on civil liberties, gerrymanders election laws, and shuts down over one hundred civil society organizations.

Yet despite Israeli efforts to invigorate the Leagues with massive support, by 1983 they had begun to disintegrate, unable to operate in the face of public resistance. Many Palestinians already consider the players in Abbas' regime as little more than criminals and collaborators. It is only a matter of time before today's Village League, headquartered in Ramallah, headed by Abbas and his unelected prime minister Salam Fayyad, and armed and funded by Israel, the European Union and the United States, is also disbanded by the people."

The Premeditated Nature of the War on Lebanon: Stage of a Broader Middle East Military Road-map

by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya

Global Research, September 10, 2007

"It is apparent after careful examination, that there has been longstanding intent to attack Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Alleged reasons or pretexts are merely a form of justification to implement otherwise unjustifiable intentions and actions. These intentions (mens rea) and the subsequent actions (actus reus), meaning aggression and war, against Lebanon, Syria, and Iran are criminal acts.

There is enough direct and circumstantial evidence, including the Winograd Commission in Tel Aviv, Israeli activities prior to the 2006 attacks on Lebanon, White House statements, and NATO operations, to demonstrate the premeditated nature of the war against Lebanon as part of a broader war campaign.......

Using Israel to do the “Dirty Work” of Launching a Major War in the Middle East?

“The red line is not in Iran. The red line is in Israel. If Israel is adamant it will attack, the U.S. will have to take decisive action,” and “The choices are: tell Israel no, let Israel do the job, or do the job yourself,” Patrick Cronin was quoted as saying by The Guardian (U.K.) on July 16, 2007. [40] The Jerusalem Post has even reported that Israeli Military Intelligence is also identifying and pinpointing Iranian targets for an attack. [41] Israel appears to be designated by the Pentagon and NATO to initiate hostilities against Iran and Syria.

The Israeli population has been persuaded to believe that they face liquidation from Iran and naturally support air strikes against the Iranians. Israel is being used to do the dirty work of possibly launching an illegal war against Iran for the Pentagon and NATO. Military action against Iran would be too unpopular within the U.S. to the point where the U.S. government may be paralyzed or lose authority to a restless domestic population. This may explain the legislation that has been passed by the Bush Jr. Administration that theoretically allows the establishment of an American dictatorship under such conditions. Rather than risk direct confrontation the U.S., Britain, and NATO are prodding the Israelis forward against Iran and Syria. Any attack on Iran and Syria by Israel will prove disastrous for Israel and the Middle East."

Israel calculating Syria's reaction to IAF violation


Al-Manar Special

"10/09/2007 As Israeli political silence over the "unprecedented" IAF violation of the Syrian airspace prevailed, Israeli media implied at the nature of the mission, without giving details. The Israeli media focused on the fuel tanks dropped on Turkish soil, saying they were tanks used for F-15 fighter jets. These planes are capable of reaching Iran and hitting targets there. This highlights the IAF mission that might have been destined to be carried out beyond Syrian borders.
The Israeli television said that unveiling the nature of the mission would cause unbearable damage to Israel. Perhaps this is what led Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to praise his army for keeping silent about the mission.

As Israeli official circles are seeking to ease down tension with Syria, particularly after reports said that the Syrian army had called up part of its military reserve, these circles expressed concern about a possible indirect Syrian reaction. Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that Israel should be on high alert for quite some time. "This is a year of preparation to respond with an unabated war. It is also a year to search for ways to achieve peace, if possible," said Barak. Israeli political analysts say that there is an alert on the intelligence level and predicted that "holidays would be very tense this year in Israel."

The Israeli silence emanating from fear from a Syrian reaction and the emphasis on avoiding a confrontation with Syria, once again underlines an Israeli fear from a second military blow. Former National Security Council chief Giora Iland warned that Hezbollah's military accomplishment in the July war encourages the Syrians to resort to the military option against Israel. "

War Drums Getting Louder


Netanyahu: We're in 1939

"Military action against Iran "should be used if we see that Iran's nuclear weapons program is about to come alive," opposition leader and Knesset Member Benjamin Netanyahu told a counter-terrorism conference in Herzliya on Monday.

Addressing delegates at a conference organized by the Interdisciplinary Center's Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT), Netanyahu said: "The military option should never be kept off the table." Some two and a half years remained until Iran would acquire nuclear weapons, Netanyahu said, adding: "That's 700 days, and today is another day."......"

DEBKAfile Reports: Two US carrier-strike groups are bound for Persian Gulf region, bringing number back to three


USS Truman

"DEBKAfile’s military sources report that from the third week of July, the only American strike force- carrier in the Persian Gulf-Arabian Sea region was the USS Enterprise. By the end of September, it will be joined by the USS Nimitz and the USS Truman Strike Groups. Our sources note that with their arrival, three American naval, air and marine forces will again confront Iranian shores at a time of crisis in the military and civilian leadership of Iran - signaled by the abrupt change of Revolutionary Guards Corps commanders, rising Israel-Syrian tensions and a troubled situation in Lebanon.......

The combined naval strike groups include the Monterey-CG 61 guided missile cruiser, the USS Barry DDG 52 and USS Mason-DDG 87 guided missile destroyers, the USS Albuquerque-SSN 706 fast nuclear strike submarine and the combat logistical USNS Arctic T-AOE 8.

In the last week of August, the USS Kearsarge Expeditionary Strike Group took up position opposite the Lebanese coast amid trepidation over the September presidential election. Our military sources reported that aboard the group’s vessels are members of the 22nds Marine special operations-capable Expeditionary Unit, who are ready to execute landings on Lebanese beaches."

Osama at large

Osama bin Laden is still alive, unharmed and making videos. If the White House wasn't so incompetent, you might think it was no coincidence.

By Ian Williams
The Guardian

"The US senate, in all solemnity, sat last week and voted to double the reward for the apprehension of Osama bin Laden to $50m. So $25m was not enough to motivate the military and security forces of the world's superpower to catch the slippery Saudi? Or is it possible that there is another reason why Osama, for all the rewards being offered, has still not been caught?......

Well, think about an administration that has used the terrorist bogeyman to justify outright war on two countries and threatens another. One that has declared economic and diplomatic war on others; that has used the terrorist threat to build up its arms budget to unprecedented heights; that has extended the prerogatives of the president beyond all constitutional measure - and invented a whole set of them for the vice-president.

Would all this have been possible if Osama bin Laden had been brought to justice and revealed to be just a ramblingly discursive, albeit murderous, faith-based fanatic?........

But I rather discount the chances of anyone collecting the senate's munificent reward until after the coming debacle in Iran, which we will, of course, have to bomb in case the Ayatollahs there are sheltering the man who regards Iranian Shi'as to be heretical abominations."

Launching Brand Petraeus


by Tom Engelhardt

"It was about this time of year in 2002, in the halcyon days of the Bush administration, that White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card offered a little political marketing advice to the world. In explaining why the Bush administration had not launched its "case" against Iraq (and for a future invasion) the previous month, he told a New York Times reporter, "From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August.".......

So launching "Brand Petraeus" and providing him with some upbeat Iraqi news (Sunnis in al-Anbar Province ally with U.S.) and numbers (violence down in August) were the two necessities of the summer. In July, the celebrity surge general, who had already shown a decided knack on earlier tours of Iraq for wowing the media, was loosed. Petraeus, in turn, loosed all his top commanders to enter vociferously into what previously would have been a civilian debate over U.S. policy and the issue of "withdrawal." This campaign, by the way, represents a significant chiseling away at traditional prohibitions on U.S. military figures entering the American political arena while in uniform.......

Why anyone in the media or Congress takes this situation seriously as "news," or even something to argue about, is hard to tell. Think of it this way: The most political general in recent memory has been asked to assess his own work (as has our ambassador in Iraq), and then present "recommendations" to the White House in a "report" that is actually being written in the White House. You couldn't call it a political version of "the honor system"; but perhaps the dishonor system would do.

Numbers in Iraq are a slippery matter at best, though again, why anyone pays serious attention to U.S. military numbers from that country is a mystery. On countless occasions in the past, these have been ridiculous undercounts of disaster.

In the midst of such chaos, mayhem, and pure tragedy, of course, who exactly is counting? Nonetheless, wherever you look, numbers, however approximate, are indeed pouring out – and, when you consider them, there is no way on Earth to imagine that the situation is anything but grim and deteriorating: first for the Iraqi people; second for the overstretched U.S. military; and finally, for the rest of the region and us.

So here, on the eve of the orbiting of Brand Petraeus, is my best attempt at "progress" by the numbers:
....."

The Mystery of al-Qaeda

Bin Laden's latest video throws new light on a murky subject

By Justin Raimondo

".......The message: be afraid, be very afraid.

The all-pervasive atmosphere of fear that spread, like a poisonous fog, from one end of the civilized world to the other in the wake of the 9/11 attacks is reasserting itself, and this new jolt of terror couldn't have come at a better time for our rulers – as they ratchet up the war propaganda and get ready to strike at Iran, Syria, and anyone else who dares defy them. This new assault on our reason – and that's what it is, make no mistake about it – comes at a plastic juncture in our political life, when Americans are getting ready to change their leadership and it looks like the other party might get a chance in power. The plasticity of this moment is further emphasized by the long-touted "report" of Gen. David Petraeus, the War Party's messiah, who is primed to tell us we're on the verge of "victory" in Iraq, or a reasonable facsimile thereof. The massive antiwar sentiment that allowed the Democrats to take Capitol Hill is stalled, and the War Party – in spite of being discredited by its lies and its crimes – is back, with a vengeance.

At this dramatic turning point, bin Laden reappears with a half-hour long tape, the transcript of which can be found here, and there is something very odd about it, in that it reads like a political polemic that might have been written by an American. It cites Noam Chomsky, as well as the Koran.......

Al-Qaeda and the War Party: one could not succeed without the other. There is no conclusive evidence that this odd symbiosis is more than just ideological. Yet I wouldn't be surprised if it extended to the operational. The mysteries of al-Qaeda are intertwined with the unsolved mysteries of 9/11......"

GOP Family Values


(Click on cartoon to enlarge)
By Bendib

Sunday, September 9, 2007

US preparing for a military strike against Iran

"WASHINGTON (RIA Novosti) - The United States is confidentially preparing for a military strike against Iran, which will include several days worth of aviation strikes on several targets at once, a former CIA official told Harper's magazine.

"It looks like there's preparations for a military strikes, and I base this on two things: on facts that we can observe, and on the rhetoric coming out of the White House," said the former CIA official, who worked in the Persian Gulf during the first U.S. war there and served in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.

"A massive deployment of troops and equipment in the region is taking place, and the U.S. can't hide that. Sending the U.S. Navy to the Persian Gulf is very expensive, but we have three such units there."

There is a deployment of ships, an increase of supplies, shipments of military supplies, and the general activity level is very high, said the former U.S. intelligence agent. "There is only one region in the world where this is all being deployed to.

"Moreover, everyone that I know - pilots and other aviation units - have all disappeared. Usually someone remains, but now all of them have gone at once." Besides unusual activity in the U.S. military, "other evidence of a possible strikes are harsh statements from the White House."......"

The Very Tough Syrian Response That Was Long in the Making: Syria Will File Formal Complaint With the UN!! Ha..Ha..Ha. Israel is Terrified


"Damascus plans to lodge a formal complaint with the United Nations Security Council about Israel's violation of Syrian airspace. Syrian Foreign Minister Waleed Mualem told European Union ambassadors in the capital that he expects to file the complaint in the coming days. Mualem traveled later in the day to Turkey, where he is expected to discuss the alleged airspace violation, among other topics......"

Bush must accept bloody reality and follow our fumbling retreat

By Simon Jenkins

"The American and British armies do not have to withdraw from Iraq. They are powerful and can stay as long as they wish, even if entombed like French legionnaires in desert forts and sustained at great cost in lives and money.

Their governments are a different matter. They need reasons for occupying foreign countries and now face humiliation in the greatest war of ideological intervention since Vietnam. They are praying for their armies to save them from this humiliation.

This week David Petraeus, the talented American general in Baghdad, reports on the progress of his “surge” strategy to an impatient Congress. Two thirds of Americans have joined two thirds of world opinion in wanting a swift American withdrawal, defined as inside a year. Petraeus’s predicament is therefore agonising. He cannot possibly offer victory. He can offer only defeat or a desperate clinging on, as now. For George Bush, his commander-in-chief, only the last is imaginable. Petraeus must therefore forget about a better yesterday or a better tomorrow, and concentrate on today......

Iraq has been a disaster, an illegal act crassly perpetrated by supposedly honourable powers. It shows what happens when crackpot idealism breaks from the realm of think tanks and journalism and penetrates the body politic. It validates the remark of the philosopher John Gray that “modern politics is really a chapter in the history of religion”.

Last month the British began fumbling their way towards an escape from this disaster. The danger for Petraeus is that he digs a deeper hole. "

"Unrecognized" Palestinians

by Stephen Lendman

Global Research, September 9, 2007

"......The Plight of Palestinian Nonpersons in "Unrecognized Villages"

The term is Orwellian in its worst sense. How can something real not officially exist? Around 150,000 or more (accurate numbers are hard to come by) Palestinian Arabs today live in over 100 so-called "unrecognized villages," mainly in the Galilee and the Negev desert. They're unrecognized because their inhabitants are considered internal refugees who were forced to flee their original homes during Israel's 1948 "War of Independence" and were prevented from returning when it ended.

These villages were delegitimized by Israel's 1965 Planning and Construction Law that established a regulatory framework and national plan for future development. It zoned land for residential, agriculture and industrial use, forbade unlicensed construction, banned it on agricultural land, and stipulated where Israeli Jews and Palestinians could live. That's how apartheid worked in South Africa.

Existing communities are circumscribed on a map with blue lines around them. Areas inside the lines can be developed. Those outside cannot. For Jewish communities, great latitude is allowed for future expansion, and new communities are added as a result. In contrast, Palestinian areas are severely constricted leaving no room for expansion. Their land was reclassified as agricultural meaning no new construction is allowed. This meant entire communities became "unrecognized" and all homes and buildings there declared illegal, even the 95% of them built before the 1965 law passed. They're subject to demolition and inhabitant displacement at the whim of Israeli officials. They want new land for Jews and freely take it from Arab owners, helpless to stop it.

All Israeli public land is administered by the Israel Land Authority (ILA) that has a legal obligation to treat all its citizens fairly. Instead and with impunity, it serves Jewish interests only using various methods to do it.

It restricts and prohibits Palestinian land development by:

-- putting large Arab areas under its control through the creation of regional councils;

-- zoning restrictions mentioned above;

-- transferring public land adjacent to Arab communities to Jewish National Fund (JNF) ownership that mandates it's only for Jews;

-- connecting the cost of leasing land to military service that discriminates against Palestinians not required to serve and almost none do;

-- declaring national priority town areas for Jews only;

-- delaying, restricting and prohibiting local development in Arab communities;

-- ignoring Arab needs in regional and national plans;

-- allowing Palestinians little or no representation on national planning committees;

-- enforcing a policy of forced evictions and demolitions of buildings without appropriate permits. In "unrecognized villages," no permits are allowed Palestinians on their own land. Entire villages thus face prosecution in the courts and loss of their homes, land and possessions through a state-sponsored policy to remove them judicially.

It gets worse. No new Palestinian communities are allowed, and existing "unrecognized villages" are denied essential municipal services like clean drinking water, electricity, roads, transport, sanitation, education, healthcare, postal and telephone service, refuse removal and more because under the Planning and Construction Law they're illegal. The toll on their people is devastating:

-- clean water is unavailable almost everywhere unless people have access to well water,

-- the few available health services are inadequate,

-- many homes have no bathrooms, and no permits are allowed to build them,

-- only villages with private generators have electricity enough for lighting only,

-- no village is connected to the main road network,

-- some villages are fenced in prohibiting their residents from access to their traditional lands,

-- in the North, only one school remains open and children must travel 10 - 15 kilometers to attend another; as a result, achievement levels are low and dropout rates high.

It's worse still when home demolitions are ordered. It may stipulate Palestinians must do it themselves or be fined for contempt of court and face up to a year in prison. They may also have to cover the cost when Israeli bulldozers do it under a system of convoluted justice penalizing Palestinians twice over......

Silence is not an option, and people of conscience can help. Noted author and documentary filmmaker, John Pilger, believes "something is changing," and he saw it in a recent full page New York Times ad having a "distinct odour of panic." It called for boycotting Israel, and Pilger senses the "swell....is growing inexorably, as if an important marker has been passed (and it's) reminiscent of the boycotts that led to sanctions against apartheid South Africa.....once distant voices," notes Pilger, have "gone global," it caught Israel off guard and may signal change. But not easily or fast and may not happen at all unless global pressure becomes mass public outrage that this injustice no longer will be tolerated by people of conscience anywhere."

Fatah’s henchmen gang up on Hebron University students


From Yousef Salim in Hebron

"Dozens of heavily-armed Fatah militiamen on Sunday ganged up and savagely beat Hebron University students, injuring dozens, including several journalists.

At least two cameramen, Yosri al-Jamal who works for Reuters, and Hazem Badr, were admitted to hospital, having been beaten up badly by Fatah’s gunmen.

According to eyewitnesses, a large force of about 100 armed men dressed in military uniform stormed the Hebron University campus before noon Sunday to suppress a student meeting, called for by the Student Council to discuss college tuitions and student loans.

“As soon as they arrived, they started beating students and journalists with clubs and rifle butts.

“They behaved like ferocious animals, they beat people on the head without any justification,” said Muhammed Ayadeh.

The gunmen reportedly were led by Samih Seifi, PA commander of the Hebron Area, who ordered journalists not to use their phones or film the onslaught on the student.

However, as journalists began taking pictures and videotaping the assault on the students, gunmen ganged up on the students and savagely beat journalists.

Moreover, cameras, including TV cameras, were confiscated, according to a cameraman working for the local Ma’an News Agency.

Al-Jamal reportedly was hit in the face and on the head, causing him an internal bleeding.

The attackers also reportedly opened fire into the air, but it was unclear if any of the student was wounded by gunfire.

Among the students reportedly injured are Muhammed Jebril Darawish (in the head), Muhammed Ismael al Wawi and Y. Jabari.

Several students were arrested including Asem al Jabari, Omar Abu Arqoub and Taher Asafreh.

The brutal attack on the students has been harshly condemned by the people of Hebron and local notables.

“Even the Jews didn’t do this to us,” said one notable from the Maraqa family. “They are thugs, thieves and criminals,” said Muhammed Jabari, another local notable.

The governor of Hebron, Hussein al Araj, refused to condemn the attack on the students, saying that “it is not the policy of the Palestinian Authority to attack students and universities.”

Al-Araj said he would order investigation into what happened, saying he hoped that such “incidents” won’t be repeated.
"

Editorial: Is that the drumbeat of war? Yet another one?

Bush steps up his warrior rhetoric, and the target is Iran. Will Congress stop him?

The Sacramento Bee

"President Bush has upped the ante rhetorically about Iran. In recent speeches, the president has said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology threatens to put the Middle East "under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust." Rockets manufactured in Iran, Bush has said, "have been provided to Iraqi extremist groups by Iranian agents," though he stops short of blaming the Iranian government. He has said outright that the United States will confront Iran "before it's too late."

Americans have heard such rhetoric before -- aimed against the Iraqi regime in the lead-up to the 2002 Iraq invasion. Such exaggerated rhetoric and bravado have serious consequences, undermining U.S. credibility and limiting options in dealing with critical issues regarding Iran......

But it's no secret that the circle around Vice President Dick Cheney favors military action. The Sunday Times in London has reported that the Pentagon has drawn up plans for airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate Iranian military capability within three days. And with the pending release of a book by Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute, "The Iranian Time Bomb: The Mullah Zealots' Quest for Destruction," that calls for "regime change" in Iran, a drumbeat for hitting Iran is under way.....

The Bush administration believes it has inherent authority to launch unilateral military operations against Iran -- even in the absence of a direct attack or a compelling, immediate threat to the United States -- without the consent of the Congress. As a top priority, Congress needs to pass the Webb Amendment (S. 759), which would prohibit the use of funds for military operations in Iran without the consent of Congress.

The American people are weary of the war in Iraq and distrustful of the leaders who got us into it. In those circumstances, you would think that another war would be the last thing on the president's mind. But Congress shouldn't make that assumption. With this White House, anything's possible."

Damn, it's 'Nam

By Eric Margolis

"We all know what "deja vu" is. But I recently read of a condition psychiatrists call "jamais vu." That's where one sees something very familiar, but cannot identify it.

Both the White House and U.S. military seemed gripped by jamais vu.

Many of the same mistakes made in the Vietnam War are being repeated in Iraq and Afghanistan, but neither the White House, Pentagon, nor U.S. field commanders seem to recognize or understand them......

U.S. commanders in Iraq, like their Canadian counterparts in Afghanistan, keep proudly reporting how their men have occupied villages or towns, killed scores of "suspected terrorists" (usually thanks to air attack), and forced the enemy to flee.

They do not seem to understand they are fighting a fluid guerrilla war in which territory and body counts mean little......

Mao Zedong perfectly described the principles of such guerilla war: "When the enemy advances, withdraw; when he stops, harass; when he tires, strike; when he retreats, pursue.".......

I have covered numerous guerilla wars in my time and have never seen Western powers win a single one. Yet we keep forgetting this hard lesson.

We have also forgotten the great Gen. Douglas MacArthur's warning after Korea, "never fight a land war in Asia."......

Meanwhile, the administration refuses to admit Iraq has no real government or army, and is an anarchic stew of competing Shia militias, tribal chiefs, death squads, 22 Sunni resistance groups, and breakaway Kurds. Iran is becoming the real power in Iraq.......

History does not repeat itself, but men's mistakes and follies do.

The latest sombre example is Iraq, where our memory of Vietnam is ... jamais vu
."

Israeli 'neo-Nazi gang' arrested


Israeli police say they have broken up a gang of neo-Nazis who are accused of carrying out attacks on foreigners, gay people and religious Jews.

Contributed by europe

"The eight suspects, aged 16-21, are all Israeli citizens from the former Soviet Union. They were arrested a month ago, but the news only emerged on Saturday......

The suspects have admitted assaulting a number of people in Tel Aviv, most of them foreign workers. Ms Almog said the gang would pick on someone who appeared unable to defend themselves and then attack.

They often filmed or photographed the violence.

In one clip a man is hit around the back of the head with a bottle.

According to the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz one video shows gang members surrounding a Russian drug addict as he admits to being a Jew. The youths then order him onto his knees to beg for forgiveness for being Jewish and a drug addict before viciously beating not only him, but also another man who tries to intervene.

The suspects all migrated to Israel under the Law of Return which allows anyone with at least one Jewish grandparent to become a citizen......"

This is how the moderates look




Haim Ramon




By Gideon Levy

"Haim Ramon has made a big comeback. As if renewing the Hebrew language, he has coined the term "infrastructural oxygen" - Israel should strike a blow at Gaza's infrastructural oxygen. Faithful to his suggestions in the Second Lebanon War ("It is permissible to destroy everything"), he is now the progenitor of the doctrine advocating cutting off the electricity, fuel and water supply to Gaza. Ramon is very proud of his demonic plan: "It's the first time the government has discussed these types of proposals," he said. In his eyes, the legal aspect is "hallucinatory"; there is no difference between Hamas and Al-Qaida. And what will happen if this cutoff of water and electricity to Gaza is not effective? "Until we try, we'll never know," the minister told an interviewer. That is, we are dealing with an experiment on human beings. As we all know, Ramon is a representative of a centrist party and is considered one of the party's moderates.

Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni is a moderate, too. She also supports the Ramon doctrine. She says that, "It is inconceivable that life in Gaza continues to be normal." In the view of the moderate foreign minister, life in Gaza is "normal" - it seems she has no idea about what life is really like there......

Avigdor Lieberman, Shaul Mofaz and Avi Dichter have become superfluous: The moderates are doing the necessary work. Israeli discourse has become monstrous - and the terrible thing about it is that these are no longer the proposals of the loony fringes, but rather of the centrist stream. How does the right-wing put it? "There are no moderate Palestinians." Well, there are no moderate Israelis. When it comes to us, the center is the right in disguise.

But, as luck would have it, just as this incitement to commit war crimes was being raised, a report was issued at the end of last week by Human Rights Watch, a reputable and unbiased American organization. The report mentions evidence that Israel Defense Forces officers were responsible for committing war crimes in Lebanon and that Israel seriously violated international law in indiscriminately killing hundreds of citizens. Ramon and Livni's proposals have prepared the ground for the next report. After implementing the Ramon plan, the call will intensify to boycott Israel and bring those responsible for the next crime to trial......."

BIL'IN! BIL'IN!: Beginning of the Fall of the Apartheid Wall


By Uri Avnery

"WHEN MY friends fall prey to despair, I show them a piece of painted concrete, which I bought in Berlin.

It is one of the remnants of the Berlin wall, which are on sale in the city.

I tell them that I intend, when the time comes, to apply for a franchise to sell pieces of the Separation Wall.*

Sometimes, when I give a lecture before a German audience, I ask: "How many of you believed, a week before the fall of the wall, that this would happen in their lifetime?" No one has ever raised their hand.

But the Berlin wall fell. This week it happened here, too - true, only in one place, to a small section of the fence, when the Supreme Court decided that the government must dismantle the obstacle (which at this place consists of a fence, with ditches, patrol roads and razor wire) and relocate it nearer to the Green Line.

THE BIBLE commands us: "Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth" (Proberbs 24,17). It is a very hard commandment to obey.

The enemy, in this case, is the "Separation Obstacle". It is hard not to rejoice, even when it is a limited joy, a conditional joy, because we have won a battle, not the campaign.......

The man who invented the wall was Haim Ramon, then a leader of the Labor Party. Ramon started out as one of the "doves' of the party (when that was popular). Later he jumped ship to the Kadima Party (when that was profitable).

This week Ramon proposed cutting off the electricity that Israel supplies to the Gaza Strip, as punishment for the Qassam rockets fired at Sderot. It must be remembered that from the beginning of the occupation, Israeli governments have prevented the setting up of independent water and electricity works there, so as to make sure that the Strip would be completely dependent on Israel in matters of life and death.

Now Ramon proposes cutting off this lifeline, to plunge Gaza into darkness, to stop electricity for hospitals and refrigerators, as a collective punishment - which constitutes a war crime. His government has accepted the proposal in principle.

If Bil'in represents the struggle of the Sons of Light, Ramon surely represents - quite literally - the Sons of Darkness."

Fatah-linked forces beat Hamas students protesting in W. Bank


"Palestinian security allied with the Fatah rulers of the West Bank beat protesters of the rival Hamas group in a demonstration Sunday in the city of Hebron.

Hundreds of Hamas students gathered outside the Hebron University in Hebron to protest an increase in tuition, witnesses said. Palestinian security asked the demonstrators to move to university grounds and, when they failed to comply, began beating the protesters with clubs, said witnesses.

Some 20 students were beaten and arrested.

The security also forbade journalists from taking pictures, confiscating the camera of one photographer, witnesses said. Some journalists were also beaten.

The Tel Aviv-based Foreign Press Association issued a harsh statement condemning the behavior of Palestinian security, as the incident was merely the latest in a series of such protests......."

Israeli settlements in Hebron make life nearly impossible, Palestinians say

UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs


"HEBRON, 9 September 2007 (IRIN) - Israeli policy in Hebron city centre has led thousands of Palestinians to leave their homes and some 1,829 businesses have been shut down since 1994, a report by the Israeli human rights organisations B'Tselem and the Association for Civil Rights has charged.

Entitled Ghost Town, reflecting the two groups' opinion of what has befallen the once vibrant centre of Hebron, the report surveys Palestinian life in the divided city.

"Israel's policy severely impacts thousands of Palestinians by violating the right to life, liberty, personal safety, freedom of movement, health, and property, among other rights," said the report......."

Manufacturing Consent for Attacking Syria and Iran


Bolton warned of NKorean nuclear facilities in Syria

"Former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, had warned in the past that Syria and Iran could provide what he described as a "safe haven" in their territory for nuclear facilities built with equipment smuggled from North Korea. In an article published in the Wall Street Journal on August 31, Bolton wrote that, "We know that both Iran and Syria have long cooperated with North Korea on ballistic missile programs, and the prospect of cooperation on nuclear matters is not far-fetched" Bolton claimed.
"Whether and to what extent Iran, Syria or others might be 'safe havens' for North Korea's nuclear weapons development, or may have already participated with or benefited from it, must be made clear," Bolton alleged.
North Korea is currently conducting talks with the United States and other nations regarding its nuclear program. Pyongyang is seeking the restoration of diplomatic ties with Washington and wants to be removed from the U.S. list of 'state-sponsors of terror', in exchange for agreeing to halt their nuclear weapons program and accept international supervision of their nuclear facilities. In his article in the Wall Street Journal, Bolton wrote that the U.S. may accept these demands, calling such a possibility a "profound mistake." According to Bolton, the U.S. should only be willing to accept such demands if among other things North Korea offers full disclosure on its ties with other states, predominantly Iran and Syria. On Friday, U.S. President Bush said Washington would consider signing a peace treaty with Pyongyang, should it abandon its nuclear program."

The Karzai Who Does Not Control a City Block in Kabul


'Gunfire' cuts short Karzai speech

"Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan's president, has been forced to cut short a speech at a Kabul stadium after sounds that seemed liked gunshots were heard.

Witnesses said Karzai was hastily led away from the ceremony at the sports stadium by his US-trained bodyguards......

Abrupt end

"Dear brothers and sisters, with respect to everybody, we are finishing our ceremony here," Karzai said as he left the stage.

An estimated 25,000 people, including cabinet members and foreign diplomats had gathered at the stadium which is located near the presidential palace......."

Retreat from Basra: the slow death of the Iraq campaign

In the week that British forces departed from Basra Palace, Kim Sengupta reports on the propects for a country where so many have died – and are still dying

The Independent

"Hassan Ali Ibrahim remembers his father talking about the last time the British were in Basra. The fighting that took place then spread across Iraq as the Shias in the south, the Sunnis in Baghdad and the Kurds in the north rose up against the invaders.

The rebellion came after Major-General Sir Stanley Maude had captured Baghdad in 1917. Six thousand Iraqis and 500 British and Indian troops had died by the time it had been put down after a prolonged campaign of attrition.

Following the invasion of the country in 2003, the headquarters for the small UK contingent in Baghdad, working with the Americans, was named Maude House. It was an ill-advised choice, for what has happened since bears remarkable similarity to events 90 years ago........"

The Unseen "Protestor" in Gaza

Balance of Power

قاسم يشن هجوماً عنيفاً ضد فصائل منظمة التحرير ويتهمها بتلقي الأموال من رام الله


قال إن ضرب الفلسطيني في الضفة يتم بطريقة سرية ومكثفة وبعيداً عن الإعلام

"نابلس – المركز الفلسطيني للإعلام

انتقد البروفسور عبد الستار قاسم أستاذ العلوم السياسية في جامعة النجاح الوطنية، بشدة دعوة فصائل منظمة التحرير للإضراب الشامل اليوم الأحد (9/9)، متسائلاً: "أريد أن أعرف عن ماذا ستضرب هذه الفصائل، هل ستضرب هذه الفصائل التي لا يكاد بعضها يملأ بكل أعضائه سيارة أجرة (نقل) عن العمل؟".

وقال قاسم في مقال له نشر اليوم: "أسألكم بالله، لماذا لم تعلنوا الإضراب عندما كان مئات الفلسطينيين من الجهاد الإسلامي وحماس داخل سجون السلطة؟ لماذا الإضراب الآن على الرغم من أن الجرائم بحق الفلسطينيين تُقترف ليل نهار في الضفة الغربية وغزة على حد سواء. صحيح أن ضرب الفلسطيني في غزة يتم أمام عدسات التصوير، لكن الضرب في الضفة الغربية يتم بطريقة سرية ومكثفة وبعيدة عن العدسات".

ولفت المحلل السياسي الفلسطيني الانتباه إلى أن "التوازن في التعامل ضروري، والتحيز يودي إلى الهاوية، نحن جميعا لم نعمل بالطريقة الصحيحة وآثرنا حياة الكذب والدجل والنفاق من أجل مصالحنا، لقد أعمتنا الأموال القادمة من الخارج، وأغرتنا المناصب الكاذبة الخاوية يا حضرات الفصائل".

وتابع كلامه قائلاً: "نحن بحاجة إلى سواعد تبني، وفؤوس تحفر، وغراس تزرع من أجل أن ننهض، من أجل أن نكون، هذا السلوك الصبياني الأبله الذي نتلهى به الآن يزيد من عمق الجرح ويقتل النفوس بالمزيد ويهوي بالهمم ويمكن الأعداء، دعونا من ترهاتكم، وتوجهوا نحو عمل مثمر تذكره الأجيال لكم".

وأضاف قاسم مخاطباً المضربين: "أنتم تحصلون على أموال من السلطة الفلسطينية في رام الله والتي تشجعكم على الإضراب، وهي التي تدفع أجرة مكاتبكم وتعطيكم السيارات التي هي على حساب شعب فلسطين".

وزاد قائلاً: "تريد الفصائل الفلسطينية الآن أن تبيع شعب فلسطين وطنية، وتريد أن تقول إنها حريصة على وحدة الوطن. منذ متى أنتم أيها السادة الفصائل بهذه الغيرة؟ وقعت البلاد في وحل الفساد الداخلي، وتحول عدد من الفلسطينيين للعمل الأمني مع الإسرائيليين، وقاموا باعتقال فلسطينيين من بينهم أحمد سعدات، ونخرت الواسطات والمحسوبيات الأوصال، وتم التنازل عن الكثير من الحقوق الفلسطينية، وأنتم تطلقون البيانات النارية نهاراً، وتلوذون إلى رب نعمتكم ليلا تطلبون الوظائف والأموال والمتع؛ هل تعلمون أن هناك قضاء معطلاً ولا يجد المواطن أمامه حلولا قضائية لمشاكله؟ هل علمتم بالفلتان الأمني والاعتداء على الموطنين وعلى ممتلكاتهم؟ هل علمتم بقمع الآراء واستبداد وسائل الإعلام؟ هل تذكرتم الآن أن هناك فلسطين وهناك شعب فلسطين؟".

وختم قاسم حديثه بالقول: "يكفي مزايدات، لم نعد نهضمكم، ولم نعد نثق بأي منكم. أنتم تستعملون فلسطين لأهوائكم ومصالحكم القبلية بشعارات وطنية ممجوجة لم تعد تقنع أطفالاً، ولا بد أنكم تذكرون كيف تتحدثون بمجالسكم الخاصة حول قيادة السلطة وسياساتها، وكيف تتعاملون عمليا مع السلطة، أنتم تكذبون وتنافقون وتتسترون وتمالئون وتزايدون"، على حد تعبيره."