Saturday, November 11, 2006
The Video Pelosi and AIPAC Don’t Want You to See
"Please note: this video contains images of women and children killed by the Israeli state with U.S. weapons in Beit Hanoun, the Gaza Strip, in violation of the Arms Export Control Act (specifically, Ttitle 22, Chapter 39, Subchapter III § 2778 c). “My wife recorded this for my blog a couple of days ago. Since then, she won’t even look at the news,” writes Sabbah.
CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO
If the above video is not enough to convince you of the brutality of the Israeli government, watch the one below. On November 2, the IOF “transferred the males of Beit Hanoun aged between 16-45 in a convoy of large trucks to unknown destinations…. Security sources reported that the Israeli occupation forces called the men through loudspeakers, and gathered them in front of An-Nassr mosque in the north of Beit Hanoun,” according to Aljazeera (English translation here). In response, unarmed Palestinian women confronted the IOF and 12 were shot, two fatally. So, the next time Nancy Pelosi gets up before AIPAC and declares Israel is simply protecting itself, please email her a link to this video."
Bolton: All Animals Are Equal, But Some Are More Equal Than Others

The US has vetoed a draft UN Security Council resolution condemning an Israeli attack in the Gaza Strip that killed 19 Palestinian civilians.
"John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, described the text as "unbalanced" and "biased against Israel and politically motivated".
He added that it did not provide an "even-handed characterisation" of the Israeli shelling of the Gaza town of Beit Hanoun that killed the 19 Palestinians, mostly women and children.
The text of the resolution, which was sponsored by Arab states, also condemned the firing of rockets by Palestinian fighters into Israel.
Ten of the council's 15 members voted in favour and four -Britain, Denmark, Japan and Slovakia - abstained.
As one of the council's five permanent members along with Britain, China, France and Russia, the US has veto power which it has now used 82 times, often to shield Israel from censure.
Reaction
Avi Pazner, an Israeli government spokesman, said: "The American veto is very satisfactory.
Nabil Abu Rudeina, a spokesman for Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, said: "We condemn this veto.
"We feel it will encourage Israel to continue its escalation against the Palestinian people."
Assembly hearing
Its previous use of the veto was in July to block a Qatari-sponsored draft resolution that would have condemned Israel's military onslaught in Gaza as "disproportionate force" and would have demanded a halt to Israeli operations in the territory.
Diplomats said Arab countries would now most likely take their case to the 192-member UN General Assembly, where their draft would get a more sympathetic hearing."
***
Now the pathetic Arab regimes will go begging the General Assembly. Of course they will maintain strong economic, trade, political, diplomatic and military ties with Washington. Victims of Beit Hanoun: RIP, no one gives a damn. By the way the Saudi stock market fell yesterday.

(Source: The Lebanese paper Al-Mustaqbal)
Is Beit Hanoun, with its dead, bringing Hamas and Fatah together?
Somerville, Massachusets Votes to Support the Right of Return
two resolutions introduced in the small town of Somerville, MA (Greater
Boston area). I think this is an excellent example of what each city and
town in America can and should do (an important benefit is that thousands in
town got educated on the subject of Israeli apartheid and Israeli ethnic
cleansing of Palestine).
Dear friends,
We have election results from nine of the eleven voting stations in
Somerville, Massachusetts.
4,102 people (44% of the total who voted on the question) voted to affirm
the right of return of all refugees, including Palestinians.
2,841 people (31% of the total who voted on the question) voted to divest
from Israel.
Considering that every single newspaper and radio station serving
Somerville, and both major candidates for governor, and the Mayor, and
Somerville's Congressman all very visibly opposed our questions, and the
Zionist forces made it their number one campaign strategy to make sure that
Somervillians knew that all the politicians opposed our questions, it is
fair to say that those who voted for our questions did so knowing full well
that it was against the will of the entire American establishment.
Furthermore, they voted against decades of pro-Israel propaganda appealing
to their sympathy for victims of the Holocaust. They said that Israel should
let the refugees return, even though that means (as the Zionists constantly
pointed out with their "right of return is code for destroying the Jewish
state" propaganda) implicitly opposing the legitimacy of the "Jewish state"
idea.
There has never been an election in the United States before that allowed
people to vote against the heretofore unchallenged pro-Israel policy of our
government. Until today, Zionists felt confident that there was no
significant opposition among the American public to our government's
pro-Israel policy. Until today, most people were so afraid of being labeled
an anti-Semite for expressing any view that organized Jewry disagreed with
that there was no evidence that anybody except an ignorable fringe had a
problem with our country's pro-Israel policy. Until today the Zionists could
have assumed that virtually NOBODY in the United States would vote against
Israel--until today's vote in Somerville, that is.
The Zionists may gloat that they defeated the two questions, but I am quite
sure that, privately, they are extremely worried, because today, for the
first time, they have seen the handwriting on the wall. The pro-Israel votes
is only going one way in the future, and that is down. The vote against
Israel's ethnic cleansing and apartheid is also going only one way in the
future, and that is up. It was a good day in Somerville today.
--John
VIDEO: Massacre of Palestinian Women and Children
Israel's "Cloud of Autumn" Massacre in Gaza
"Global Research Editor's note
Israeli Forces shoot indiscriminately at Palestinian Women and Children.
The official story of the Israeli military is that this was a crack-down operation on "terrorists".
Read the semi-official report by the Voice of America (VOA) (below) and then view the video to see what really happened:
"Mr. Olmert says Israel intends to stop what he describes as the terror coming from Gaza, but has no intention of reoccupying the territory.
Israeli military authorities expressed regret for the death of a 12-year old girl. She was shot by an Israeli sniper who Israeli authorities say was aiming at a Palestinian militant.
Two Palestinian women were killed by Israeli troops in a chaotic demonstration by Palestinian women acting as human shields for Palestinian militants. The militants escaped from a mosque in Beit Hanoun that was under siege by Israeli forces." (VOA)
The "hidden agenda" behind Israel's so-called "unilateral disengagement plan" (leading to the 2005 evacuation of Jewish Settlers) is to transform Gaza into a concentration camp.
How long will the Western media, which claims to be balanced, continue to justify Israeli war crimes?
Michel Chossudovsky, 10 November 2006"
CLICK HERE TO SEE VIDEO
Part of the video is new; it is about 3 minutes long.
Pain and disbelief in Gaza
| By Matthew Price BBC News, Jerusalem |
Earlier this week, tens of thousands of people mourned the 18 Palestinians killed by Israeli tank fire in the Gaza town of Beit Hanoun. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has expressed regret and some Israelis are now beginning to re-assess the ongoing conflict.
When I got back home I went straight to the balcony.
I turned on the hose, took off my boots and washed them down. Made sure I got the blood off them. They are out there now, drying.
Then I went to shower, washed my hair, brushed my teeth. Beit Hanoun was dirty. I wanted to feel clean again. The streets were soiled. The tanks had left their track marks by the shops.
The wall outside the secondary school had been knocked down. Railings to stop children running into the street were bent over.
On one pavement I saw a trickle of dried blood, where a woman had fallen, shot in the head. And on a quiet residential street, the faces told me everything I needed to know.
The sides of the road were lined with people. Some stood, others sat. They stared into space, at one another, at the ground. Some put an arm around a neighbour. One man grieved alone, tears on his face. All had the same look in their eyes.
I noticed it because it was not the look you see so often, one of hatred, of revenge. This was a look of sheer disbelief. I noticed someone I had met before. A taxi driver who once picked me up at the Erez crossing into Gaza. Raed had the same look. Not quite crying. But you knew something was deeply, deeply wrong.
How many of your family have you lost, I asked? "All of them. They all had the same grandfather."
"I feel hate," he added. He did not spit it out like people so often do. He just said it. "I hate George W Bush. I hate Israel of course. I hate the Arab world. I hate Europe." His eyes, though, did not say hate. They said pain.
Incomprehension
Later, when I got home, I spoke to an Israeli friend. She sounded broken. She is a true left-winger, always has been.
They are rare here now. She described how another Israeli had called her earlier, saying she felt so ashamed that she dare not call her friends abroad.
I told my friend it is not her fault. I know, she said. You meet very few Israelis who express such feelings.
Most, of course, express regret, especially at the death of children. But many of them find it impossible to properly understand Palestinians. It is often easier to blame. And it works both ways.
Earlier this week I met a Palestinian man who told me most of his neighbours think that all Israelis are soldiers.
"They only ever see soldiers," he pointed out.
"I try to tell them they are mothers and fathers like us," he added.
And this is the tragedy here. Neither side comprehends the other.
Hardliners prevail
The gulf between the two is so great that perhaps neither side wants to anymore.
The other day at an event marking the assassination of the Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, one of Israel's most acclaimed left wing authors delivered the keynote speech.
David Grossman pulled few punches. He talked of an Israel in crisis, and of the failure of the peace process.
"The Palestinians are also to blame for the impasse," he said.
"But take a look at them from a different perspective, not only at the radicals in their midst.
"Take a look at the overwhelming majority of this miserable people, whose fate is entangled with our own, whether we like it or not."
The sad fact is most Israelis do not take a look at the Palestinians.
More and more it seems to me, it is the hardliners on both sides whose voices are being heard the loudest.
A day after the killings in Beit Hanoun, the Israeli newspapers were full of comment.
Some - predictably - said the deaths were preventable. If only the Palestinians would stop firing rockets at Israeli towns, Israel would not have to shell Gaza.
But there were others from a different perspective.
One commentator wrote: "For us, [these deaths] pass as if [they] were nothing.
"We have to ask ourselves. Does this really serve our national interest?"
Haunting memories
When I left Beit Hanoun, I went to the BBC bureau in Jerusalem to edit a television piece.
We have both Israelis and Palestinians working there.
I took a break to make a coffee and walked out into the newsroom to find a young girl, four or five years old, her hair in pigtails, standing with her father.
He is a producer in the office.
An Israeli, and it threw me.
She looked exactly like some of the girls I had seen in Gaza that day.
Back from the dead, standing there in front of me.
We closed the edit suite door so she would not see the pictures.
Outside on the balcony, my boots are now dry. It will be harder to wash away the memories of what happened at Beit Hanoun.
AIPAC Eats New Congress Critters for Lunch

By Kurt Nimmo
"Lest we forget who runs Congress, consider the following “briefing” posted on the AIPAC website yesterday:
AIPAC Builds Ties With New Lawmakers
AIPAC reached nearly every lawmaker elected in Tuesday’s mid-term congressional elections as part of its effort to educate political candidates on the value of the U.S.-Israel relationship. During the campaign that ended Tuesday, nearly every viable candidate met with AIPAC professional staff members and submitted a position paper summarizing his or her views on U.S. Middle East policy. A non-partisan organization, AIPAC has for decades worked with Republican and Democratic members of Congress to strengthen the ties between the United States and Israel.
Translation: Nearly every lawmaker, except the few stragglers hiding out in bathroom stalls or the cloakroom, was told he or she best tow the AIPAC-Israel line, or suffer short tenure in Congress. Part of this process is obviously the forced submission of a “position paper summarizing his or her views on U.S. Middle East policy,” that is to say the targeted politico must state in writing that he or she will enthusiastically support Israel killing Palestinians, stealing their land, and running those able to run off, in short a nod and a wink in the direction of ethnic cleansing. Finally, AIPAC let us know they are “non-partisan,” that is to say they have both Democrats and Republicans in their pocket.
Meet the new Congress, same as the old Congress.
Addendum
In addition, assumed House Majority leader Pelosi will “have to draw on … inner strength,” that is to say bend over backwards and jump somersaults like a trick dog, in order to demonstrate her worth to AIPAC and the state of Israel.
Sam Lauter, a pro-Israel activist in San Francisco, predicted Pelosi “will hear from those in the Jewish community who argue that Democrats no longer support Israel the way they used to,” that is to say Zionists perceive Democrats to be not as rabidly pro-Likud as Republicans, that is to say neocons.
“Some Republicans, in fact, questioned Pelosi’s support for Israel this summer. The congresswoman ended up removing her name as a co-sponsor from a House resolution supporting the Jewish state during its war with Hezbollah because it did not address the protection of civilians,” reports JTA, billed as a “news service that provides up-to-the-minute reports, analysis pieces and features on events and issues of concern to the Jewish people,” or rather Jewish people who support Israel.
It would appear Pelosi has at least a shred of humanity, as she was apparently sickened by Israel’s genocidal war against the people of southern Lebanon last summer. However, she has the next two years to get it right and adopt the appropriate position—all the people of southern Lebanon are Hezbollah terrorists, as the Israeli leadership stated on numerous occasions as the pariah state went about breaking every rule in the crimes against humanity book.
But then, as U.S. ambassador to the U.N., John Bolton, said at the time, it is surely a “mistake to ascribe a moral equivalence to civilians who die as the direct result of malicious terrorist acts, the very purpose of which are to kill civilians, and the tragic and unfortunate consequence of civilian deaths as a result of military action taken in self-defense,” in other words, as Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz explained, Israeli civilians are more innocent than Lebanese civilians. "
فلسطيني يحرز جائزة أفضل مصور إخباري للعام 2006

حقق المصور الفلسطيني الصحافي زكريا أبو هربيد مدير التصوير في وكالة أنباء رامتان، من سكان بلدة بيت حانون المنكوبة فوزا عالميا كأفضل مصور إخباري للعام 2006، بعد خوضه لمنافسة شديدة مع مصورين آخرين لحيازة هذا اللقب العالمي الجديد.
وفاز أبوهربيد بالجائزة الدولية الأولى عن صورته الشهيرة للمجزرة التي ارتكبها جيش الاحتلال الإسرائيلي بحق عائلة الطفلة هدى غالية على شاطئ غزة في يونيو/ حزيران الماضي.
وكان المصور الفلسطيني أول من وصل إلى مكان القصف الذي طال عائلة فلسطينية تستجم على شاطئ بحر غزة، ووجد نفسه للوهلة الأولى أمام مجزرة دموية جديدة بحق عائلة كاملة ملقاة على الرمل.
ويتمنى الإعلاميون الفلسطينيون أن يسهم نبأ فوز زكريا بالجائزة في رسم معالم البسمة التي غابت عن شفاه أبناء بلدته التي طالها الدمار والخراب.
اعتراف بالجريمة
ويقول شهدي الكاشف رئيس تحرير وكالة رامتان، إن فوز زكريا بالجائزة ليس فقط تكريما لكل الصحافيين الفلسطينيين الذين يرفعون لواء الحقيقة في تغطيتهم للأحداث والجرائم الإسرائيلية التي ترتكب بحق أبناء الشعب الفلسطيني.
وأضاف في تصريحات للجزيرة نت أن فوز الزميل أبو هربيد يمثل اعترافا دامغا بالجريمة التي ارتكبت بحق عائلة غالية ودليلا جديدا على إدانة الاحتلال بارتكاب تلك المجزرة، موضحا أنه "منذ انتشار صور الطفلة هدى غالية وهي تصرخ في أعقاب المجزرة، ونحن نتعرض في وكالة رامتان والزميل أبو هربيد لهجمة إعلامية من أوساط غربية وإسرائيلية تتهمنا بفبركة تلك المشاهد".
وأشار إلى أن هذه الجائزة تشكل حافزا لكافة الإعلاميين في الأراضي الفلسطينية المحتلة، لنقل معاناة وحقيقة ما يجري للفلسطينيين، في جميع المحافل الدولية.
حزن وتأثر
من جهته ذكر سامي المسحال مراسل وكالة أنباء رامتان الذي حضر الحفل أنه أثناء عرض صور زكريا خيمت مشاعر الحزن والأسى والتأثر على الحضور الذين كان من بينهم شخصيات إعلامية دولية.
وأوضح المسحال في تصريحات لوكالة رامتان أن أبو هربيد خاطب الحضور قائلا "اليوم بالرغم من سعادتي بالفوز بهذه الجائزة، أشعر بالحزن والأسى لأنني لا أستطيع أن أغطي ما يحدث في بلدتي بيت حانون المنكوبة".
وأضاف أبو هربيد "أهدي هذه الجائزة وهذا التقدير الدولي إلى كل أطفال فلسطين، وأخص بالذكر الطفلة هدى غالية"، معبرا عن أمله بأن يحل السلام في فلسطين.
يشار إلى الجائزة التي حصل عليها أبو هربيد بعد تمكنه من التقدم في النهائيات على مصورين من العراق وأفغانستان، تنظم برعاية مؤسسة رولي بك ترست العالمية في لندن، التي ترعاها شركة سوني العالمية للتصوير، ومؤسسات إعلامية دولية كشبكة الجزيرة و(BBC) البريطانية, و(CNN)الأميركية.
***
I could not find this item (from Al-Jazeera, Arabic) in English, so I will offer a brief translation:
The Palestinian photographer Zakaria Abu Harbid was awarded the international award of being the best news photographer in 2006. He is the photography manager of the Palestinian RAMATAN news agency and a native of Beit Hanoun.
He was awarded the title for his photos of the massacre of Palestinians on the Gaza Beach last June by Israel. In particular, the winning photo was that of Huda Ghalia crying uncontrollably beside the body of her dead father. Zakaria was the first to arrive at the scene after the Israeli shelling.
The chief editor of RAMATAN said that the award is a tribute to all Palestinian journalists who take huge risks to expose the truth about Israeli war crimes against the Palestinians. He added that the award is an indirect condemnation of these Israeli war crimes. Since the photos were published, he said that RAMATAN and Zakaria himself have been subjected to a hostile campaign from Israel and some western media, accusing them of fabricating the photos!
Zakaria said that while he was happy to receive the award in person, he was sad that he could not be in his native Beit Hanoun covering current massacres. He dedicated the award and the international recognition to all Palestinian children and to Huda Ghalia in particular.
Gaza: While the world looked elsewhere, another week of death and misery

By Donald Macintyre In Beit Hanoun
Published: 11 November 2006
The Independent
"The Western world, which was anyway more interested by the count in the state of Virginia than the catastrophe in Beit Hanoun, has no doubt already moved on. For the Athamneh family, now in their second day of mourning after the funerals, it is impossible to do so.
As friends and neighbours continued to arrive at the blue mourning tent 150 yards from the now-deserted family home, Mustafa, the arm of his widowed father Usama around his shoulder, was unable to stop crying. "I have no one to play with," he had said a few minutes earlier. "I have no one around me." The sense of loss and survivor guilt he will have to grow up with is scarcely imaginable. "I was with my mother when she fell down," he said. "I ran away. I haven't slept for two days and nights."
Yesterday, red-eyed but eager now to get the details right, Majdi, who had barely been able to speak on Wednesday, described how he had rushed out into the alley with his wife and children after the first shell hit the roof only to see Saad, semi conscious and gasping after being struck by the second shell, lying on the ground. He had rushed to the end of the alley, turning right into Hamad Street, to try and summon help or an ambulance, but was halted in his tracks by third shell. As he turned back, a fourth shell, he said, struck the building, killing Saad. He picked the child up in his arms and ran back and turned left into the street. Before he could reach the crossroad 50 metres away, a fifth landed. He believes this was the shell which killed four of his female relatives.
But they react with near-universal disbelief at Israel's depiction of the artillery barrage as a "technical malfunction", or at the idea that its targeting could not have been observed in real time by one of the units among the military presence in the vicinity. "One or two shells might be a mistake but not 15 or 20," said Ibrahim Al Athamneh. The number of shells was probably closer to 12. But there is no dispute that the number of civilian deaths from last Wednesday rose to 19 yesterday as one more man died of his wounds.
Reflecting for a moment on the meaning of the attack, Majdi allowed himself one political statement - a reference to the newest Israeli Cabinet member, the hard-right nationalist Avigdor Liberman. "It's a present for the deputy Prime Minister," he said. "The man who said he wanted to turn Gaza into Chechnya." "
***
What is shocking and indicative of how low the Arab world has sunk is to see reporters from Britain (such as Mr. Macintyre) and other European countries, the U.S. (such as Jennifer Lowenstein) and even Israel (such as Gideon Levy and Amira Hass) reporting first hand from Gaza and the West Bank, but you rarely see an Egyptian, a Jordanian, a Saudi or a Moroccan doing the same. For God's sake, all an Egyptian would have to do is to cross through the border crossing between Egypt and Gaza at Rafah. Is he/she afraid that Israel would not allow him/her? Where is Egyptian sovereignty over the border? Where is the responsibility Egypt bears for the poor people of Gaza, since it controlled Gaza until it was captured by Israel? Why does Jennifer Lowenstein (a Jew) show more courage and determination when she overcomes determined Israeli obstacles to prevent her from coming to Gaza than Arab reporters?
All I can say is thanks to the courage and the conscience of the "foreigners;" they are a critical link while our Arab "brothers" continue to indulge in their sleep and stupor.
The US conservative project has taken an existential hit
A GOOD COMMENT
Martin Kettle in Washington
Saturday November 11, 2006
The Guardian
"What happened this week was not complex. It was the crash of the conservative political project begun by Newt Gingrich in 1994 and crystallised under George Bush since 2000. It was the crash heard round the world. It came in the form of a nationwide protest against the Iraq war and Bush's presidency. A new survey of actual voters, conducted since election day by Bill Clinton's former pollster, Stan Greenberg, confirms that Iraq was by far the most important issue that influenced Americans' votes. The divide among those for whom Iraq was the most important issue went 3:1 in favour of the Democrats. That, in a nutshell, explains what happened.
The use of the word crash is important if we are to understand the new situation in Washington. This was not an election in which the traditional Democratic vote finally roused itself to overturn Republican rule. It was an election in which the Republican coalition that has gradually come to dominate America since the civil-rights acts of the 1960s suffered a huge existential hit as a result of Bush and Iraq.
It will take time for this to sink in among conservative Republicans. This election has been a major blow to their self-image and world-view. Like the Thatcherites, they got used to assuming that they were always right and would always be victorious. On Tuesday the voters told them they were wrong. It has taken many false starts for the Conservative party to get back in the game in Britain. Something similar could happen to the suddenly weakened Republicans. But there's nothing they like more than a fight.
And Iraq? Those who expect a sudden sea change may be disappointed. It won't be a 180-degree shift, a senior British Washington-watcher suggests. But maybe a 60-degree shift is now on the cards. The name of the game now is minimising the damage of a lost war. With Democratic approval, American policy has been explicitly subcontracted to James Baker and his Iraq Study Group. But that doesn't in itself solve the problem. The damage of Bush's Iraq adventure has just got bigger, not smaller. It now stretches from the streets of Baghdad and Basra into the heart of the once triumphalist and now humbled Republican party."
Olmert courts Abbas, wants to meet him
"When he sits with me, Abbas will see how much we will give him. I pay high esteem to him", Olmert was quoted as saying in press statements.
He described Abbas as "rational man who opposes terrorism (the term Israel uses to label the Palestinian people's legitimate resistance against it)", adding, "Abbas is facing difficulty in controlling the armed Palestinian organizations, and I have told him so more than 20 times".
Website of the Hebrew daily Yedioth Ahronoth quoted Olmert as affirming that he was ready to release big numbers of Palestinian inmates as "an initiative of goodwill on Israel's part and for the sake of Abbas and not Hamas" in exchange for the release of [IOF serviceman] Gilad Shalit.
"I have told the Jordanian King Abdullah, Egyptian president Husni Mubarak, and British Prime Minister Toni Blair that I am ready to release Palestinian prisoners; and I say to the Palestinians: you don’t know the numbers of Palestinian inmates I am going to free for Shalit's freedom", the website quoted Olmert as saying.
Three armed wings of the Palestinian resistance factions led by the Qassam Brigades of Hamas succeeded in capturing Shalit and keep him for four months now, affirming that the IOF corporal will not be released unless Israel meets their demands of releasing Palestinian female, children, and sick inmates in addition to another 1,000 prisoners, especially those serving long terms.
In the opposite, Olmert stressed that his IOF troops' brutal aggressions on the Palestinians will continue despite the massacre in Beit Hanun, adding "I can't assure you that innocent Palestinian civilians will no longer be targeted".
In an attempt to justify the carnage, Olmert said that his troops committed a "technical error" that caused that number of victims. Palestinian people scorned Olmert's justifications, opining that such statements portray IOF troops' clear undermining of the Palestinian blood.
Israel to allow armed Abbas' loyalists into Gaza Strip:
In the same context, Hebrew media on Friday revealed that the Israeli occupation government will, most likely, allow entry of thousands of Badr force elements from Jordan into the Gaza Strip in a bid to strengthen Abbas' military power there, which is considered a Hamas stronghold.
The sources added that Israel's war minister Amir Peretz conferred with his top military lieutenants over the matter, unmasking that Israel could even supply Abbas' forces with the munitions necessary to bolster the PA chief's fist in the Strip.
Late October, website of another Hebrew daily, the Ha'aretz, unveiled that the PA presidency requested the Israeli occupation government to allow such force to come into Gaza Strip; but, the request was still under deliberation. Local observers opined that Israel's approval of the entry of such forces was, apparently, made with the aim to ignite a civil war in the PA-run lands.
PFLP criticizes Abbas over untoward remarks on resistance:
Meanwhile, the Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades, armed wing of the PFLP, criticized statements uttered by Abbas where he described Palestinian home-made missiles as "useless, ineffective, and giving Israel the pretexts to attack the Palestinian people".
Spokesman of the Brigades Abu Alam stressed that Israel needs no reasons to justify its brutal policy against the Palestinian people, as he regretted Abbas' remarks over the Palestinian rockets, describing him (Abbas) as "the engineer of the infamous Olso agreement".
"Israel was striving hard to thwart firing of Palestinian missiles on its troops and on Israeli settlements inside the 1948-occupied Palestinian lands, but to no avail, which per se proves that those missiles were effective and useful in retaliating to the IOF aggressions against our Palestinian people", Abu Alam retorted to Abbas' remarks.
Friday, November 10, 2006
BEIT HANOUN
THE ARABS' OLIVE BRANCH
UN: IDF killed 116 children in 2006

UNICEF says 17 children killed in Gaza, and 2 in West Bank so far in November, 40 killed in July
Associated Press Published: 11.10.06, 16:43
"Nineteen Palestinian children have been killed in the past 10 days, making November already the second deadliest month of the year for young people in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, UNICEF said Friday.
The UN children's Fund said 17 have been killed in Gaza and two in the West Bank so far in November. Only July - when 40 children were killed - was worse, the agency said.
"What children and adolescents have endured the past few days will likely have a long-lasting impact," UNICEF spokesman Michael Bociurkiw said in Geneva. "They have seen family members killed and their communities destroyed. They have been confined to their homes, in many cases without access to food, water or electricity."
Israeli artillery shells ripped through a residential neighborhood Wednesday in the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun, killing at least 18 people , including eight children.
Bociurkiw estimated that more than 300 children have been injured this month by Israeli attacks. For the year, he said 116 Palestinian children have been killed, compared with only 52 last year.
Marines Get the News From an Iraqi Host: Rumsfeld’s Out. ‘Who’s Rumsfeld?’
“What kind of freedom?” he asked. There are almost no schools, he said. There is almost no medicine. There is little food, and no electricity except from generators. The list went on. No water. No work. Violence. Abductions. Beheadings. Explosions.
His son-in-law had been kidnapped by insurgents seven months ago, he said, and a note the insurgents left said he was abducted for being friendly with American troops. He has not been seen since.
In Baghdad, he said, Iranian-backed death squads were killing Sunni citizens. The country was falling apart.
“You like freedom?” he asked the sergeant. “This kind? This way?”
HIGH QUALITY PHOTOS OF BEIT HANOUN FUNERAL
I remained silent

We mustn't look the other way when blood of some becomes worth less than others
Laila M. El-Haddad
(Laila M. El-Haddad is a journalist who lived in the Gaza Strip and author of the blog Raising Yousuf)
"When such a massacre occurs, in addition to the anger and frustration, I cannot help but feel lonely and abandoned and afraid.
It is the feeling we all have as Palestinians, the feeling which boils inside of us, sometimes drowning us with its complexity and force and unrequitedness. To quote Mahmoud Darwish:
“We are alone. We are alone to the point
of drunkenness with our own aloneness,
with the occasional rainbow visiting.”
And don’t think for one moment that this somehow does not affect you, whoever you are, as you recoil in your comfort zone, choosing consciously to look the other way. It affects all of us - Israelis, Palestinians, humankind - when humans become less human, when their blood becomes worth less than ours. Niemöller’s poem rings truer than ever:
"They came first for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I did not speak up because I was not a Jew.
When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out."
Let us add to the famous poem:
"Then they came for the Palestinians, but I remained silent, for I was not Palestinian". "
Israeli strike on Iran possible
Associated Press Writer
November 10, 2006, 12:17 PM EST
JERUSALEM -- The deputy defense minister suggested Friday that Israel might be forced to launch a military strike against Iran's disputed nuclear program -- the clearest statement yet of such a possibility from a high-ranking official.
"I am not advocating an Israeli pre-emptive military action against Iran and I am aware of its possible repercussions," Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh, a former general, said in comments published Friday in The Jerusalem Post. "I consider it a last resort. But even the last resort is sometimes the only resort."
Sneh's comments did not necessarily reflect the view of Israel's government or of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, said government spokeswoman Miri Eisin.
Olmert, who was arriving in Washington on Sunday, said he was confident in the U.S. handling of the international standoff over Iran's nuclear program. The Bush administration and other nations say is a cover for developing atomic weapons, but Tehran says the program is peaceful.
"I have enormous respect for President Bush. He is absolutely committed," Olmert said in an interview on NBC's "Today" show. "I know that America will not allow Iran to possess nuclear weapons because this is a danger to the whole Western world."
The United States and its European allies have proposed a raft of sanctions to try to curb the country's nuclear development.
Israel sees Iran as the greatest threat to its survival. Hard-line Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for Israel's destruction, and Israelis do not believe his claims that Iran's nuclear program is meant to develop energy, not arms.
Israel crippled Iraq's atomic program 25 years ago with an airstrike on its unfinished nuclear reactor. Experts say Iran has learned from Iraq's mistakes, scattering its nuclear facilities and building some underground.
Sneh's tough talk is the boldest to date by a high-ranking Israeli official. Olmert and other Israeli leaders frequently discuss the Iranian threat in grave terms, but stop short of threatening military action.
Years of diplomacy have failed to persuade Iran to modify its nuclear program so it can't develop weapons.
Does Father Know Best?
By Justin Raimondo
"Leave it to the Americans to consider their foreign policy in terms of a family drama: the current narrative is that Rummy's exit signals the arrival of Daddy's Wise Men to bail out Junior from the mess he's made in the Iraqi sandbox. Like a frat boy who has maxed out his credit card or totaled his flashy new sports car, poor little Georgie-Porgie has finally turned to Daddykins for advice he once spurned. Just like in an episode of Father Knows Best – or, better yet, Leave It To Beaver…
As those helicopters pulled away from the roof of the U.S. embassy in Saigon, with people clinging to them for dear life, the American public became intimately acquainted with defeat – and it wasn't pretty. In the decades since that traumatic event, Americans shied away from foreign adventurism, whether undertaken in the name of "democracy" or a coldly calculated American interest, haunted by the memory of what happened in Vietnam.
The problem is that, for all their alleged wisdom, these miracle-making realists have failed to recognize reality – even though they are staring it in the face. They can't undo what the invasion has done: broken the Iraqi nation into its constituent parts and handed the biggest piece over to neighboring Iran. That was accomplished the moment the Ba'athist regime cracked, and all of Bush's Wise Men can't put it back together again.
It isn't just the Iranians, the Syrians, the Saudis, the Israelis, the Kurds, and the Lebanese factions that the Wise Men have to deal with. There are also domestic roadblocks to a comprehensive – or incremental – settlement of the Middle Eastern question, notably what John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt call "the Lobby" in their seminal study of Israel's lobby in the U.S. It was the Lobby that, in large part, lured us into the Iraqi quagmire, and this same concatenation of forces stands in the way of an orderly withdrawal of U.S. forces.
The Lobby opposes a Middle East settlement: they stand for expanding Israeli interests, at the expense of the Arabs and the Persians, and their goal [.pdf] – the atomization of existing Middle Eastern states down to a more manageable stature – is being rapidly accomplished in Iraq. Their goal is to duplicate the process throughout the region, and this means more "regime change" – in Lebanon, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, as well as Iran.
In any contest pitting the Baker Commission against the Lobby, the outcome is going to be problematic – but I'd put my money on the latter. Especially as the neocons ditch their old Republican allies and attach themselves to a new host – the Democratic Party – it is hard to see how the War Party is going to be stopped. Unless, of course, the American people wake up in time – there's always that possibility. The recent election is proof that they haven't fallen permanently asleep: they can be roused, if only there's the right stimulus.
It remains to be seen what the Wise Men are up to, but I wouldn't put much store in it: whatever it is, it's likely to proceed at a snail's pace, and, for the reasons given above, the clock is ticking…"
حكومة الاحتلال تبلغ عباس بأنها ستتيح إدخال "قوات بدر" إلى القطاع

الجانب الصهيوني سيقوم بإمداد قوات عباس بالسلاح والذخيرة
الناصرة – المركز الفلسطيني للإعلام
أفادت مصادر إعلامية عبرية اليوم الجمعة (10/11)، أنّ الحكومة الصهيونية أبلغت رئيس السلطة الفلسطينية محمود عباس رسمياً بأنها ليس لديها أي مانع من إدخال "قوات بدر" المتواجدة في الأردن إلى الأراضي الفلسطينية، كما وتعهدت بإدخال شحنات من الأسلحة والذخيرة للقوات التي تأتمر بإمرة عباس.
وأشارت المصادر إلى أنّ الحكومة الصهيونية اتخذت ذلك القرار عقب التصريحات التي أدلى بها رئيس الوزراء الصهيوني إيهود أولمرت مساء أمس الخميس، والتي قال فيها إنه سيدعم عباس ويدعوه إلى الاجتماع معه في أي وقت، كما قال بأنه سيقدم تسهيلات وسيخرج أسرى فلسطينيين مقابل إطلاق سراح الجندي الصهيوني الأسير في غزة جلعاد شاليط ولكنّ ذلك سيتم من أجل رئيس السلطة، حسب ما ذكر.
وأوضحت المصادر ذاتها أنّ وزير الحرب الصهيوني عامير بيرتس، اجتمع بكبار الضباط في جيش الاحتلال، وأطلعهم على ترتيبات إدخال "قوات بدر" المتواجدة في الأردن إلى قطاع غزة، وإمداد القوات الفلسطينية التابعة لعباس بمقومات إضافية، حيث تم الاتفاق على منح رئيس السلطة "تسهيلات كثيرة تمكِّنه من المضي قدما في تحقيق السلام في المنطقة"، كما ورد.
وكان الموقع الإلكتروني لصحيفة "هآرتس" العبرية، قد أورد في 28 من شهر تشرين الأول (أكتوبر) الماضي، أنّ مكتب عباس طلب من الحكومة الصهيونية السماح بنقل آلاف المقاتلين الفلسطينيين من كتيبة "بدر" التابعة لجيش التحرير الفلسطيني من الأردن إلى قطاع غزة بأسلحتها الكاملة.
ونقل الموقع عن ناطق باسم وزارة الحرب الصهيونية قوله، إنّ وزير الحرب بيرتس يدرس الطلب الفلسطيني الذي قُدِّم من مكتب عباس بـ "جدية وإيجابية".
وأشار الموقع إلى أنّ الحكومات الصهيونية السابقة رفضت طلبات متكررة من السلطة الفلسطينية بنقل قوات بدر إلى الضفة الفلسطينية المحتلة، إلاّ أنها تدرس الآن نقل تلك القوات إلى قطاع غزة، وهو ما يراه المراقبون محاولة لإشعال فتيل مواجهات داخلية في الساحة الفلسطينية، وتبديد فرص الوفاق المتاحة.
The Treacherous Road to Oslo Begins Here
By RAMZY BAROUD
CounterPunch
"Attempts to coerce Palestinians into submission have not always manifested themselves in the crude form of a tank, a bullet, the withholding of aid or the denial of freedom of movement. These efforts were at times more imaginative and shrewd, through the sponsoring and espousing of factionalism, the purchasing of the integrity of a politician, pressing Palestinians themselves to promote foreign agendas, whether knowingly or unwittingly.
It was recently revealed that a few individuals, affiliated with the Hamas government and Hamas-dominated parliament were allowed entry into Britain. News of the visit was first unveiled by the disingenuous Israeli media, which concocted a skewed version of the event, claiming that the delegation met with Israeli 'academicians' in London.Disappointingly to many, Ahmed Yousef, top advisor to the Palestinian Prime Minister, as well as a less know member of Parliament - vehemently refused to participate.
The last eight months were indeed long enough to force Hamas to reconsider its approach to politics: breaking the siege on Gaza, it deduced, starts in Washington, with Israeli consent of course. Washington, however, is a long way from Gaza, since the distance between the latter and Damascus and Tehran is too close for comfort from the US viewpoint and its own checks and balances; London, thus, was the most practicable destination.
The meetings in London were held under the guise of 'dialogue', where Hamas would articulate its position to an exaggeratedly sympathetic audience; and in turn, the latter, would take their notes and lobby politicians for a change in course. The content of the meetings, despite the overt secrecy, was leaked, though not in full, all allowing for the following deductions:
First, Neo-conservative elements have for long, (but increasingly since Hamas' political rise, envisaged an arch of Islamic extremism) that goes all the way from Tehran to Gaza, passing through Damascus and South Lebanon. Hamas would eventually become a major component in this arch, due to the symbolic importance of the Palestinian problem to Muslims worldwide, and the direct nature of its conflict with Israel.
Second, the attempt to overthrow Hamas with the help of disgruntled elements within its rival Fatah, through numerous means has failed; a popular uprising, an outcome of the collective punishment and pressure on the Palestinian people through the withholding of aid is too slow and uncertain a strategy. The waiting game is backfiring as 'extremist' elements within Hamas are predictably falling prey to Iran's strategic designs, while the 'moderates' are being marginalized to the political fringes of Gaza. Thus, time was of essence.
Third, since Washington has raised its conditions for engaging Hamas much higher than the latter's ability to compromise, it was not possible for the Bush administration to talk to the Islamic movement openly; the Blair government however, who has always left a wide margin to politically reposition itself more freely in the Middle East has a better chance to engage Hamas, even if unofficially. The engagement had to be conducted in a most careful manner, so as not to raise suspicions regarding London's pro US and Israel stances, or doubt the integrity of its so-called 'war on terror'.
Fourth, the 'discussions' in London were clearly geared toward wooing Hamas to reveal its moderate face, thus to offset and perhaps challenge the extremists in Damascus, therefore, creating yet another rift within the Palestinian camp, to be added to numerous rifts which already exist within their ranks.
This rift would be much more treacherous, because it carries all the symptoms of Oslo: good Palestinians singled out and groomed for a photo op to be scheduled later, secret 'dialogue', followed by 'memorandums of understandings', then treaties, then VIP cards to those involved in the positive engagement and lonely prison cells to those who dare defy it. But it was this exact same plot that led to the killing of thousands of Palestinians, and hundreds of Israelis, the destruction of thousands of homes, the confiscation of more land to make way for the illegal Jewish settlements and the Separation Wall."
Human Rights Watch: IDF Probe No Substitute for Real Investigation

"The Israel Defense Forces' internal inquiry into its artillery shelling of Beit Hanoun, which killed 19 Palestinian civilians and left dozens injured in northern Gaza, failed to address the key questions of whether the attack was a violation of international law and who should be held accountable for the lethal fire, Human Rights Watch said today. The Israeli government should immediately conduct a comprehensive independent investigation to establish these issues. "The IDF's internal probe suggests that the Beit Hanoun tragedy can be chalked up to an errant volley of shells," said Sarah Leah Whitson, director of the Middle East and North Africa Division of Human Rights Watch. "But a comprehensive investigation should start with questioning whether Israel had any business firing artillery shells into this civilian area to begin with."
Human Rights Watch said that the investigation should examine the policy that has led Israel to fire some 15,000 artillery shells into Gaza since September 2005, killing 49 Palestinian civilians and seriously injuring dozens more. A comprehensive investigation should identify issues of individual and command responsibility, including criminal responsibility, for any violation of international humanitarian law committed in the conduct of these artillery operations in northern Gaza.
"Israeli forces launched the artillery attack on Beit Hanoun at a time when their commanders knew, or should have known, that the risk of civilian deaths far outweighed any definite military advantage," said Whitson. "
Suez-50 years on
SUEZ & BUDAPEST – 50 YEARS LATER
H. Scott Prosterman
Last week marked the 50th Anniversary of the aborted Hungarian Revolution of 1956. Coincidently, it also marks the 60th Anniversary of the failed tripartite invasion of the Suez Canal by a joint Israeli-British-French force. This timing of these two events represents one of the most chilling confluences of history. It also illuminates the great integrity of President Dwight David Eisenhower, who made bold diplomatic moves in the Middle East, in the weeks leading up to the 1956 U.S. Presidential Election, despite the risk of losing Jewish votes. (A related event was the USSR-Hungary aquatic bloodbath known as the Olympic Water Polo match of the 1956 Olympics. One of the participants in that ugly event was former U.S. Olympic and Michigan Swim Coach, Jon Urbancek.)
Israel invaded the Sinai Peninsula on October 29, 1956, three days after the USSR had invaded Hungary. The preface to this invasion was a complex series of events prompted by the Cold War, Western commercial concerns, and the best and worst of nationalism. Egyptian President Gamel Abdel Nasser had nationalized the Suez Canal three months earlier on July 26, 1956. Nassser’s power play was mitigated by his intention to compensate the Canal shareholders, who were to lose their interests to nationalization. But Nassar’s insistence of maintaining Egyptian control made the Western European powers uneasy, in view of his growing relationship with the USSR and Czechoslovakia the previous year. In particular, American Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and British Prime Minister Anthony Eden, would not accept Nassar’s agenda of neutrality in the Cold War atmosphere.
During the height of the Red Scare in America, neutrality was not an option. You were either with us or against us, and Nasser and Dulles were diplomatic irritants to one another during this period. Nasser had approached the U.S. about assistance for improving the Aswan High Dam for commercial development and greater military assistance. Dulles’ refusal of Nasser’s request for aid for the Aswan Dam, was prompted by pressure from the American cotton industry, which was already nervous about the increased shares of Egyptian cotton on the global market. Dulles did the bidding for American cotton farmers’ interests, by pressuring Britain and the World Bank to also withdraw support for the Aswan Dam project. Nasser’s final request to the U.S. was met by a less than generous gift, so Nasser expressed his gratitude by taking that money ($2 million by some accounts) and building a useless tower on Gizera Island in Cairo. Egyptians called it “Dulles’ Folly.” Meanwhile, Nasser continued his agenda of trying to modernize Egypt’s economy by improving the Aswan Dam, and his military, so he sought and received the aid from Czechoslovakia and the USSR that the US had refused.
Angered by the dismissal and condescension from the West, Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal on July 26. British PM Eden wanted to invade the canal immediately, but was told that his military was not prepared for such a venture. Instead he initiated an arms embargo against Egypt on July 30, and informed Nasser that Egyptian control of the canal was not acceptable. Nasser further alarmed the Western powers by enlisting Soviet support to help run the canal, leading to an attempt on the part of the US, Britain and France to impose a “user agreement” on the Canal, and effectively take it over from Egypt on September 12. Three days later, Nasser had Soviet ship pilots running all the traffic through the Canal..
Israel’s invasion of the Sinai on October 29 had been pre-arranged with Britain and France, who followed up with air support on November 5. This happened to be Election Day in the U.S., and occurred, despite a UN brokered cease-fire that was issued on November 2. In 1950, the US, Britain and France formed their own tripartite agreement “to assist the victim of any aggression in the Mideast." Ike was furious that his closest allies had violated the spirit of that agreement AND kept him in the dark about their plans for invasion.
Though Britain and France did not lend air support until the actual Election Day, their involvement in the Suez campaign was visible throughout the Summer and Fall of 1956. Ike’s problem was that he was trying to pressure the Soviets to quit Hungary. Condoning the aggression by his allies in Egypt would have severely weakened his hand. So, Ike “ordered” Israel, Britain and France to pull back. In essence, “How can I tell the Soviets to quit Hungary and stay out of the Middle East, when you guys are invading Egypt? And by the way, I’m trying to get re-elected next week, so don’t give me another headache.” (Paraphrasing mine).
While Eisenhower was no more a fan of Nasser than his counterparts in Britain and France, he recognized that Nasser had established a good track record at running the Canal and keeping it open. He also recognized that Egypt was being victimized by aggression on the part of his allies, who had neither consulted nor informed him. Eden had not told Eisenhower of the planned invasion on his Election Day, creating a huge rift of hard feelings. Despite the great political risk of alienating Jewish votes in the weeks before the election, Eisenhower stood firm in his resolve to pressure the three countries to withdraw from Egypt, in the weeks before the election. Two days later, on November 7, the UN honored Eisenhower’s leadership, and voted 65-1 that the invading powers had to quit Egypt.
It may be argued that this was the greatest display of integrity by an American President in history, with all due respect to Lyndon Johnson placing his weight behind the Voting Rights Act 1964. Indeed, when he was reminded about the great political risk of alienating Jewish voters by being even-handed towards all parties in the Middle East, he said, "I don't care in the slightest whether I am re-elected or not. I feel we must make good on our word.” (1) Eisenhower’s political bravery reminds us of the integrity that once defined the American Presidency, and the deficiencies of our current and recent leaders.
(1) Donald Neff, Warriors at Suez.
Palestinian PM offers to resign
His comments came after talks on a unity government with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.
Sanctions were imposed this year by Israel and Western countries, which see Hamas as a terrorist organisation.
"If we have to choose between the siege and myself, we must lift the siege and end the suffering," Mr Haniya said.
Mr Haniya said the discussions on forming a unity government were yielding results and that he hoped a new cabinet could be in place within three weeks.
Despite intense international pressure, Hamas has refused to recognise Israel, renounce violence and respect previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements.
Hamas and Fatah are also locked in a power struggle and the political differences between them remain deep.
Pinochet in Palestine

looks at the similarities between regime change in Chile and Palestine and condemns the collaboration between Fatah and Palestine's enemies
A STUNNING ARTICLE AND A MUST READ
A MASTERPIECE BY PROF. MASSAD
By Joseph Massad
Al-Ahram Weekly
"Before the United States government subcontracted the Chilean military to overthrow the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in 1973, it carried out a number of important missions in the country in preparation for the coup of 11 September. These included major strikes, especially by truck owners, which crippled the economy, massive demonstrations that included middle-class housewives and children carrying pots and pans demanding food, purging the Chilean military of officers who would oppose the suspension of democracy and the introduction of US-supported fascist rule, and a major media campaign against the regime with the CIA planting stories in newspapers like El Mercurio and others. This was in a context where also the Communist Party and the Leftist Revolutionary Movement (MIR) criticised and sometimes attacked the Allende regime from varying leftist positions.
The Chilean example is important to keep in mind when one looks at the Palestinian situation today, as it functions as a sort of training video for US-planned anti-democratic coups elsewhere in the world. Not only are the US and Israel financially backing the open preparation for a coup to be staged by the top leadership of Fateh (and in the case of Israel allowing weapons' transfers to Palestinian Authority [PA] President Mahmoud Abbas's Praetorian Guard), but so are the intelligence services of a number of Israel-and US-friendly Arab countries whose intelligence services have set up shop openly in Ramallah more recently, making their longstanding and major, though understated, involvement in running the Palestinian territories more open and shameless. Indeed the intelligence "delegation" of one such Arab country has rented out a multi-story building in Ramallah to conduct their operations there.
Israel has helped this effort all along by kidnapping and arresting Fateh members who resist the collaborationist policies of the top leadership. As for the leadership itself, it has periodically purged members of Fateh who oppose its policies, and marginalised those in the Diaspora who continue to resist them. The Fateh/PA coup leaders consist of Abbas and the ruling triumvirate of Mohamed Dahlan, Yasser Abd Rabbo, and Nabil Amr. The profiles of these three make them well suited for the tasks ahead. Dahlan is universally known as America's and Israel's main corrupt military man on the ground. Abd Rabbo (aka Yasser Abd Yasser, literally "Yasser worshipper of Yasser" on account of his subservience to Arafat) is the architect of the Geneva accords, which recognise Israel's right to be a racist Jewish state as legitimate and reject the right of Palestinian refugees to return as illegitimate. He recently upheld the Israeli position when fighting with the Qatari foreign minister and his staff during the latter's visit to the occupied territories. Amr is the former PA information minister, and a former visiting fellow at the Israel lobby think tank the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. He is also the speechwriter for Abbas and Dahlan.
Abbas and these three have undertaken not only to launch massive strikes by the Fateh security thugs that they have armed to police the territories on behalf of Israel, and strikes by the bureaucracy that staffs the PA ministries, but also have coerced large numbers of Palestinians, including teachers and professors, under the force of guns, to uphold a strike against Hamas, when most of them had voted for Hamas in the first place and refuse to strike. Palestinians who have fought for decades to keep their schools and universities open against Israeli draconian closures and suspension of Palestinian education, are now forced by Fateh and its armed thugs to stop the Palestinian educational process with strikes against Hamas, and threaten to shoot people if they refuse to follow Fateh's coup directives.
In addition, Abbas and the Fateh/PA triumvirate have organised demonstrations in Ramallah by middle-class Palestinians, including housewives, who brought out their pots and pans, in a scene borrowed from 1973 Santiago, in demonstrations against Hamas. The Fateh-controlled press, especially Al-Ayyam is fomenting major anti-Hamas propaganda campaign in preparation for the coup and is thus playing the same role as El Mercurio did in Chile. Al-Ayyam is aided in its efforts by the anti-Hamas secular Palestinian intelligentsia, most of whose members are on the payroll of the bankrollers of the Oslo process and its NGOs. These old leftist Palestinians, like their counterparts in Lebanon, are better known today as the right-wing left, as they take up right-wing positions while insisting that they are still leftists based on positions they had held in the 1980s or earlier.
The plan is that the Fateh/PA rulers would do their utmost to provoke Hamas to start the war at which point Fateh, with the aid of the intelligence services of friendly Arab countries, as well as assistance from Israel and the US, would crush Hamas and take over. Indeed, the first unsuccessful round took place when the Israeli government kidnapped a third of the Hamas government, both cabinet ministers and parliament members, and placed them in Israeli jails. This was not sufficient to bring Hamas down, and not for lack of help that Fateh rendered the Israeli occupiers. Aside from the initial burning of the Legislative Council building, Fateh thugs have also burned the prime minister's office, shot at his car, burned offices in different ministries several times, harassed and threatened Hamas ministers and parliamentarians whom Israel failed to kidnap and arrest, refused to allow the government ministries to operate, and so forth.
Fateh's planned coup is not only based on the popularity of Hamas and its electoral victory but also on Hamas's increased ability to defend itself against Fateh forces. If the US and Israel armed Fateh thugs under Arafat's leadership to crush the first Palestinian Intifada and any remaining resistance to the occupation since 1994, today, Hamas is almost as well- armed as Fateh forces and can defend the rights of the Palestinians to resist the Israeli occupation and the well-armed Palestinian collaborators that help to enforce it. This is where the situation today differs measurably from that of the mid-1990s. To offset this new balance of forces, the United States government, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, has been training Abbas's Praetorian Guard in Jericho for over a month with American, British, Egyptian, and Jordanian military instructors, and is providing arms to them in preparation for the confrontation with Hamas. The Israeli cabinet in turn has recently approved the transfer of thousands of rifles from Egypt and Jordan to Abbas's forces. The Israelis also approved a US request that Israel allow the Badr Brigade -- part of the Palestine Liberation Army currently stationed in Jordan -- to deploy in Gaza. These steps have been conceived by General Keith Dayton, the American security coordinator in the occupied territories, who wants the Badr Brigade to function as Abbas's "rapid reaction force in Gaza". As a possible step to increase its security and military roles in the occupied territories, the Jordanian government recently established a legal committee to review the provisions of Jordan's decision to "disengage" from the West Bank announced on 31 July 1988, effectively suggesting the possibility of a reversal of part or all of these provisions. More recently, the Israelis intensified their bombings and killings in Gaza, most recently in Beit Hanoun murdering over 50 Palestinians in a few days.
Mahmoud Abbas and his ruling triumvirate are reticent at the moment to start an open war for fear of a public backlash. They prefer to remove Hamas through imposing a "national unity" government that would undercut Hamas gradually and peacefully. However, Abbas and his triumvirate are quickly losing patience. Indeed, in a hastily-arranged meeting of the Diaspora-based Fateh Central Committee set to convene in Amman three weeks ago to ratify the coup plans, members of the committee opposed Abbas's US and Israel-supported coup, which forced Abbas to cancel the meeting altogether claiming falsely lack of quorum as the reason. This speaks to Abbas's desperation in engineering the coup without adequate preparation. Indeed, rumour has it across the occupied territories that the desperate attacks committed recently against Palestinian Christian churches were the work of undercover thugs. Those who sent them want Palestinian Christians and the world at large to think that these were Hamas acts in response to the pope's racist pronouncements against Islam. Hamas duly condemned the attacks. Few in the occupied territories believe that Hamas was behind them and most know that they were the work of undercover agents.
The Fateh plan is simple: where Israel and its Lebanese allies failed to crush Hizbullah in the Sixth war, Fateh and its Israeli allies will succeed in crushing Hamas, even if the ongoing Israeli war against Hamas and the Palestinian people becomes an all-out Seventh war. The flurry of visits by Condoleezza Rice to the area in the last few weeks hoped to put the final touches on this plan. If Hamas, like Hizbullah, could be provoked into a military response, the coup planners believe, then Fateh's and Israel's wrath (backed by the US, Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia) would be unleashed to finish Hamas off. The Fateh leadership and its thugs are sharpening their knives for the showdown. Hamas has remained calm despite the pressure.
In the meantime, Ramallah proper (excluding the surrounding villages), continues to be what many now refer to as the Palestinian Green Zone, sheltering, in addition to the intelligence staff of Israel and Israel-friendly Arab countries, those Palestinians who are paid and protected by the Oslo process, whether the Oslo bureaucracy, its technicians, and hired intellectuals, or the business and middle classes recently habituated to the new name-brand consumerism that the Green Zone can offer. This opulent life contrasts with the life of the rest of the Palestinians outside Ramallah who live in misery, hunger, and under the bombardment of the Israelis and the attacks of savage Jewish colonial settlers, not to mention the harassment by Fateh thugs. In Ramallah itself, the trigger-happy thugs shoot at random during their demonstrations, injuring and sometimes killing passers by "in error". Even the few secular intellectuals who deign to oppose Fateh inside Ramallah are harassed in different ways. Some of them experience mysterious robberies that are repeated every time they make anti-Fateh statements. The preservation of Ramallah as the Green Zone is paramount to Abbas and the Fateh/PA triumvirate, whose fear of any reform introduced by Hamas would strip the elite of the benefits of corruption and the dolce vita that Fateh-rule has ensured for them.
Meanwhile, Abbas and his triumvirate will continue to treat Hamas the way Israel has treated the PLO and other Arab countries all along. In the interminable negotiations that Hamas held with Fateh to avert a showdown, whenever Hamas would agree to a Fateh demand, Fateh would up the ante and insist on another concession or claim that its initial demands always included the now expanded terms, even though they did not. Moreover, Fateh would also publicly interpret Hamas's concessions as having included things that Hamas had not agreed to at all. If this is reminiscent of the post-Oslo negotiating strategy that the Israelis used successfully with Arafat, this is because it is the same strategy. Abbas has gone so far as to walk away from negotiations, and refuse to speak to Hamas leaders, just as the Israelis have done often with the PA. Moreover, if the Israelis would often carry undercover attacks against Western interests to implicate Arab governments, the clearest example being the infamous Lavon Affair of the mid-1950s targeting Egypt, similar operations are being committed to implicate Hamas by undercover agents, like the recent example of the attacks on the churches illustrates. There may be many more such operations being planned.
Whatever fig leaf still covered the Fateh leadership's complete collaboration and subservience to Israeli interests has now fallen off. As a result, there is very little left that can restrain Fateh's actions. The next few weeks will be decided by how much Fateh leaders are itching for a fight to save their skins and fortunes, and how much patience Hamas can muster in the face of so much thuggery. In the meantime, what has been unfolding in the Palestinian territories is nothing short of the Chilean script.
Pinochet is in Palestine. His success however remains far from certain.
* The writer is associate professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history at Columbia University. He is the author of The Persistence of the Palestinian Question: Essays on Zionism and the Palestinians (Routledge, 2006).
A profound pessimism has taken hold of Israel
Jonathan Steele
Friday November 10, 2006
The Guardian
"The Israeli artillery fire that claimed 18 civilian lives in Beit Hanoun this week is the worst single attack in Gaza for six years. Whether it will prompt an end to Hamas's moratorium on suicide bombings hangs in the balance, but the attack - said by Israeli officials to be an error - has clearly put Israel on the moral defensive.
Meanwhile, the US is arming Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah organisation for a confrontation with Hamas that risks plunging Gaza into all-out civil war. It wants thousands of rifles to be sent to Fatah from Egypt and Jordan, and is seeking to persuade Israel to permit the Badr brigade, a pro-Fatah militia stationed in Jordan, to cross into Gaza.
Five years ago most Israelis seemed to want a deal with the Palestinians. The war with Lebanon and the rockets from Gaza have reinforced the mood swing that Sharon launched with his mantra: "Israel has no partner for peace." Segev is deeply pessimistic: "It's no longer politically correct to say one believes in peace. Young people don't. It's legitimate to hate Arabs and want them to disappear somehow." Looking back on the decades since Israel occupied the West Bank and Jerusalem, Segev adds: "In 1967 there was a choice: give the territories back and make peace, or settle them and make Israel strong. It hasn't worked. What a terrible waste of time the last 40 years have been."
Gideon Levy is one of the few Israeli journalists who still goes to Gaza - a venture that increasingly requires physical as well as moral courage. "A generation on both sides is growing up which never meets each other. In the past there was a relationship. Palestinians were working here. The relationship was unequal, but it wasn't just a matter of hate. Everyone believes we are facing monsters, not human beings." Desperate words, but they have the ring of truth."
AT SEA
A change in direction
A GOOD ANALYSIS
By Jonathan Freedland
Friday November 10, 2006
The Guardian
"From now on, the neoconservatives will have to give way to the foreign policy "realists" - those who believe America projects itself best in the world partly through force but also through the patient, pragmatic work of alliances and diplomacy. So out goes Rummy and in comes Robert Gates, a former CIA chief and protege of the first George Bush who, along with his former secretary of state, James Baker, is the living embodiment of the realist school.
This makes the latest move psychologically compelling. It's as if the prodigal boy prince, having learned the error of his ways, has been forced to return to the wisdom of his aged, kingly father. When he was in his pomp, when he still believed the war in Iraq was a mission accomplished, Bush was asked by Bob Woodward if he had consulted Bush Sr on the conflict. "You know, he is the wrong father to appeal to in terms of strength," the president said. "There is a higher father that I appeal to."
The politics is even more fascinating than the psychology. For Gates has been serving on the Iraq Study Group, the commission co-chaired by Baker. It was Baker who commended Gates to Bush Jr, who pointedly did not interview any other candidates for the Pentagon job. This makes it impossible to imagine the administration doing anything but endorsing the Baker recommendations when they surface next January. How could the new defence secretary reject proposals he helped draft?
Gates's appointment signals a marked change in direction, confirmation that the Baker report will not just be a worthy tome destined to collect dust on a shelf, but a near-official statement of America's exit strategy.
Baker via Gates could solve that problem, providing an answer that all of Washington can rally around. And Dick Cheney will just have to lump it."
OLMERT'S LION

Olmert calls on Palestinian president to return to negotiating table; ‘I’m willing to sit down with him with no predetermined conditions,’ he says.
Ronny Sofer Published: 11.09.06, 17:21
“Abbas is exposed to Hamas’ pressures, and I am willing to sit down with him with no predetermined conditions,” the prime minister said. “He would be surprised to see how far I’m willing to go in the talks.”
I have great respect for Abu Mazen (Abbas). When we will sit around the negotiation table he will be very intransigent," Olmert said in a televised interview aired to people attending the conference.
"He is a Palestinian patriot, not Israeli. He will fight for Palestinian interests like a lion. But he is a decent man, he opposes terror. He is under pressure from terror groups and has no power to oppose them and overpower them. I sent him the message 20 times."
The prime minister warned that he is ready to release many prisoners as a gesture to Abbas, but not to Hamas, in return for the release of Gilad Shalit.
***
Ariel Sharon described him as a "baby chick." Now Olmert describes him as a "lion!" Wow, what a transformation! In reality, he is still the same spineless Usraeli puppet.
So, this is the "lion" Hamas wants to form a "unity" government with? Are we to believe that this is a marriage made in heaven? To me it is more like a marriage between Fidel Castro and Madonna. Enjoy!
Thursday, November 09, 2006
Israeli soldiers rampage through Hebron after Palestinian youth demonstrate
by ISM Hebron, 8th November
Palestinian youths demonstrated against the Israeli massacre in Gaza at the Israeli checkpoint on Shuhada street today. All shops in Hebron closed in mourning.
International Human Rights Workers (HRWs) arrived at 1pm to see Israeli soldiers firing live rounds at demonstrators who hid behind burning tires and threw stones. Two soldiers ran out from the checkpoint firing their guns. Ten minutes later five more soldiers ran out, followed by a further five riding in an armoured vehicle. They positioned themselves behind concrete road blocks, firing rapidly at the demonstrators.
The soldiers then closed the checkpoint for the next few hours.
At 1.12pm a milkman arrived on his donkey and approached the checkpoint but was sent back. Around the same time a Palestinian HRW managed to exit the checkpoint with a video camera but the international HRWs were refused exit by the soldier on duty. Two Israeli settlers tried to exit but were also sent back.
At 1.24pm soldiers fired rubber and live bullets at demonstrating youth. Soldiers then moved away from the checkpoint and toward the Old City. They moved up a side street near Beit Romano settlement to attack a group of youths at the end of the street. They were hiding around a corner behind a flaming tyre. Once again the soldiers shot at the youth, who threw stones at them.
At 1.36pm Israeli soldiers advanced along the side street. Suddenly several Palestinian children around 11 or 12 years old ran around the corner and threw rocks at the soldiers. One soldier was hit on the leg and fell to the ground.
More soldiers poured out through the checkpoint and five returned. At 1.30 the Palestinian with the donkey was allowed to unload his milk. International HRWs were again refused exit by the soldiers but Palestinians were allowed out.
By 1.37pm five Palestinians had been detained at the Shuhada street checkpoint along with the donkey. When asked by a HRW, the soldier on duty said there was still “ongoing trouble” and that he would let people through as soon as things calmed down. They were finally let through at 2.10pm. Only the exit side of the checkpoint was working at this point, though Palestinians were being allowed through it in both directions.
Inside the Old City market, four Armoured Personal Carriers (APCs) were driving around. At 1.48pm one of them pushed a fruit stall backwards along the street and spilled the oranges. By 2.30pm soldiers were patrolling the street randomly stopping Palestinian men and forcing them to lift their shirts.
At 2.40pm six Palestinian youths stoned an APC that was driving through the area carrying shooting soldiers. A soldier jumped out, shot at the youths, jumped back in and drove away. Five minuteS later more stones hit a stationary APC which eventually backed away.
At 3.05pm six Palestinian youths threw stones at an army jeep from behind two burning tyres. The jeep drove around the area shooting at the protesters.
Israeli soldiers were moving along the street kicking parked cars. They were very abusive to journalists, both Palestinian and international. They screamed at them and tried to damage a car that belonged to one of them.
A soldier pointed his gun at a seven year old girl from about 300 feet away. She ran into her home scared. When she came back he shouted “sharmuta” (Arabic for whore) at her. He gestured dismissively at a HRW who said to him, “You just called a child a whore?”
“Get a life,” he said.
“And your life is calling children whores?”.
Soldiers then shot tear gas at a group of women and children, including six HRWs. The soldiers laughed at the painful effects it had on them. They spent the next three hours driving up and down the street, laughing and joking. They shot tear gas directly at children, hitting one ten year old boy in the leg. He had been riding past on his bike at the time, clearly not carrying any rocks.
Overall, they shot off more than 50 canisters of tear gas, at least 50 rubber bullets as well as a number of live rounds.
11/08/06-CFL ALERT: PUT A HALT TO THE ISRAELI MASSACRES IN THE PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES.

CLICK HERE TO SEND CFL'S PREWRITTEN LETTER TO YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS: 11/08/06-CFL ALERT: PUT A HALT TO THE ISRAELI MASSACRES IN THE PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES.
*On November 8, Israeli tank shells killed at least 18 people in their sleep. Eight children are said to be among the dead. Of the 18 killed, 13 were from the same family and over 40 more were wounded in a residential attack on Beit Hanoun. According to witnesses at the scene all of the dead are women and children. The human cost of the attacks on Beit Hanoun have resulted in over 75 Palestinians killed in less than a week.
*On November 6, the international Red Cross condemned what they called a deliberate Israeli attack on clearly marked ambulance workers; the ICRC issued a statement saying that, "The International Committee of the Red Cross is appalled by this failure to protect personnel engaged in emergency medical duties. The individuals concerned and their means of transport were clearly marked with a distinctive emblem conferring the protection of the Geneva Conventions [on the conduct of warfare]," continued the same statement." Two paramedics were killed.
*On November 3, two Palestinian women who were taking part in non-violent protest were killed when Israeli Occupation Forces began shooting at a group of hundreds of women from Beit Hanoun. To watch video of the attack on unarmed women, click here.
*Call, Fax and Email your representatives today and ask them to stop supporting the indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian women and children. Tell them that you expect this country to do what it must to stop the killings in Gaza. Israel would not be able to commit these crimes if not for the support of the U.S. In fact, in Palestinian media has been showing pictures all day of the shrapnel being pulled out of the bodies of Palestinian victims all of it stamped: Made in the U.S. It is unacceptable for us to be supporting war crimes in the territories. Tell your elected officials to take heed of the elections we just had in this country. The Republicans ought to realize that we have had enough war, lies and corruption. The Democrats should know that we can, as a people, come together for change and that they must support justice in this world by condemning Israeli atrocities or we will not vote for them either. Supporting Israeli war crimes is not only immoral but it is never going to make this country safer.
EMAIL AND OR CALL THE WHITE HOUSE
WHITE HOUSE COMMENTS LINE: 202-456-1111
WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD: 202-456-1414
WHITE HOUSE FAX: 202-456-2461
==============================
Citizens for Fair Legislation
www.cflweb.org
(Their website has a bunch of prewritten letters on it, so when I get their latest alert I usually resend all the old letters too--it doesn't hurt and it's soooooo easy to do. --christian sunni)
الاردن يمنع تنظيم تظاهرة تنديد بالمجزرة
عمان ـ يو بي آي: قالت لجنة التنسيق العليا لأحزاب المعارضة الأردنية ان الحاكم الإداري لعمان سعد الوادي المناصير رفض الموافقة علي تنظيم المسيرة التي كانت دعت إليها احتجاجا علي المجازر الصهيونية المتواصلة في بيت حانون . واشارت اللجنة، التي تضم 14 حزباً، في بيان نشرته علي موقعها الإلكتروني امس الخميس الي أن الناطق باسم اللجنة والأمين العام لحزب جبهة العمل الإسلامي زكي بني أرشيد تلقي كتابا بذلك جاء فيه أعلمكم بعدم الموافقة علي إجابة الطلب..استنادا للصلاحيات المخولة لي بموجب قانون الاجتماعات العامة رقم 7 لسنة 2004 .
THE ZIONIST MEDIA FOR YOU
"A relative carries the body of Maram Al-Athamna, 1, during her funeral in the Gaza town of Beit Hanoun Thursday Nov. 9, 2006. Tens of thousands of grieving Gazans, weeping in anguish and screaming for revenge, crammed into a cemetery on Thursday to bury 18 civilians killed by an errant Israeli artillery barrage that tore through a crowded residential neighborhood. (AP Photo/ Adel Hana)"
So AP has already concluded its own investigation and determined that the victims were "killed by an errant Israeli artillery barrage."
So, this is "free" and "objective" western media for you; they brainwash their audience, one brain at a time.

A relative carries the body of Maram Al-Athamna, 1, during her funeral in the Gaza town of Beit Hanoun Thursday Nov. 9, 2006.(AP Photo)

A relative carries the body of Maysa Al-Athamna, 3, during her funeral in the Gaza town of Beit Hanoun Thursday Nov. 9, 2006. (AP Photo)

A Palestinian carries the body of three-year-old Maisa al-Athamna during her funeral at Beit Hanoun town in northern Gaza Strip, November 9, 2006. (Suhaib Salem/Reuters)

An elderly Palestinian man cries during the funeral procession for 18 civilians killed in the northern Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanun.(AFP)

Palestinians carry the bodies of 18 civilians during their funeral procession in the northern Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanun.(AFP)

Palestinians carry the body of Rima Assamna, one-year-old (R) and Alaa Assamna during their funeral procession in the northern Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanun. (AFP)

People prepare the graves of 18 Palestinians killed by Israeli artillery, at Beit Hanoun cemetery in northern Gaza Strip, November 9, 2006. (Suhaib Salem/Reuters)
Meanwhile in Palestine
Anger as Gaza buries its dead: Tens of thousands of Palestinians wept and screamed for revenge as they buried 18 civilians killed by Israeli shelling in a massive funeral in Gaza on Thursday.
US to veto int’l probe on Gaza attack: United States expected to veto Security Council decision against Israel regarding recent IDF operations in occupied Gaza
Venezuela's Chavez condemns IDF shelling in Gaza: "This morning Israel again, against UN resolutions, began bombing Gaza ... sleeping children and their mothers perished," Chavez said at a news conference with foreign journalists.
Israeli forces beat schoolchildren in occupied Jerusalem: More than 25 female and male school students were beaten, amongst them 8 female students, who were fiercely beaten, causing one of them to lose consciousness.
French troops almost fired at Israel jets: minister: French peacekeeping troops in Lebanon recently came within two seconds of firing missiles at Israeli fighter jets that approached as if to attack them, French Defense Minister Michele Alliot-Marie said.
Are Democrats' gains in House good for Israel?: Supporters of Israel are expected to lean heavily on the party's incoming House Democratic leadership
Pelosi’s support for Israel: With Pelosi as speaker, Jewish activists and officials are confident that the U.S. Congress will remain strongly pro-Israel.
In case you missed it: Nancy Pelosi Gives A Pep Talk To AIPAC: The speech affords a up-close look at what Pelosi thinks about Israel, the Palestinians, the Mideast, and nukes.
Meanwhile in Iraq
At least 41 killed in ongoing bloody U.S. occupation: A total of six people were shot dead, including a police officer, in Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad, a medical source said.
29 Bodies Found Scattered Around Baghdad: Police in Baghdad found 29 bodies around the capital in the last 24 hours with gunshot wounds and signs of torture, an Interior Ministry source said.
Baghdad car bomb blast kills six, wounds 28: A car bomb in central Baghdad killed six people and wounded 28 more on Thursday, an interior ministry source said.
US was warned of Iraq chaos, says ex-diplomat : He claimed that when official documents from the Foreign Office are made public, they will prove that the view of British officials, repeatedly conveyed to the Americans, was that overthrowing Saddam Hussein would cause chaos.
Dahr Jamai: Bechtel's billions down the drain : The decision of the giant engineering company Bechtel to withdraw from Iraq has left many Iraqis feeling betrayed. In the company's departure, they see the end of remaining hopes for the reconstruction of Iraq.
It Wasn’t Only Rumsfeld’s War

By Tony Karon
(journalist from Cape Town, South Africa, resident in New York since 1993, currently a senior editor at TIME.com)
"But instead of admitting and reckoning with the fact that the war they advocated was a catastrophically bad idea, everyone from neocon hacks to flip-flopping Democrats, Bob Woodward (arch channeler of White House sources) and the self-styled “liberal hawks” of the chattering classes, like Peter Beinart and George Packer, have signed on to the notion that it was a good war, the right war, executed badly, because Rumsfeld adhered to some bizarre capital-intensive theory of warfare. In other words, if Rumsfeld had simply sent more troops, the outcome would have been different.
And that narrative, which the White House itself appears to have adopted in the wake of its midterm electoral drubbing, is a self-serving evasion. Indeed, the “blame Rumsfeld for Iraq” chorus reminds me of nothing as much as listening to Trotskyists trying to rescue Bolshevism by blaming its grotesque consequences on Stalin’s “implementation” rather than on its inner logic.
None of this absolves Rumsfeld, of course. I’ve always seen him as a kind of scary clown figure, light reflecting off his glasses as he muttered his trademark circular dissembling. Like a Dr. Strangelove character who might be played by Jack Nicholson… America is well rid of him. But it has not yet confronted the problem as long as Cheney, and Condi, and Bush himself are on the job, and the media is still taking seriously all the revisionist pundits who blame Rumsfeld for their own hubris."

WARNING TO PALESTINIANS:
--------------------------------------
ABBAS, THE SNAKE, SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED; KEEP HIM AT ARM'S LENGTH.
HE IS NOT "BROTHER" ABU MAZEN.
HE IS THE SNAKE IN THE HOUSE WHO REPRESENTS USRAELI INTERESTS, NOT PALESTINIAN INTERESTS.
France demands independent probe of Beit Hanoun incident

"Ambassador to the UN Jean Marc Chevalier says his country demands independent investigation into IDF shelling of north Gaza town; United States expected to veto Security Council decision against Israel regarding recent IDF operations in Gaza; ‘Israeli occupying forces have committed another massacre,’ Palestinian UN observer Riyad Mansour says"
Saddam's Trial in Context
By NICOLA NASSER
CounterPunch
"Saddam's trials were staged to buy the U.S. and British leaders as well as the rulers of their new Iraq some time for political survival, but the trials needed no time to prove they are counterproductive and will in no way make the conclusion of a farce trial a turning point, a "milestone" or an end of era as President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki prematurely stated.
Democrats' crushing victory in the U.S. mid-term election was the latest proof that his administration's gimmick of orchestrating trials of Saddam Hussein was a failure that clearly turned the pre-planned verdict against Saddam into a popular verdict against Bush himself, in a referendum on his performance in the war on Iraq that broke his grip on power in Washington by depriving him of ruling with his own Republican party in charge of both houses on Capitol Hill, as he has done for six years.
While the western public opinion has criticized the trial on the grounds of its legal flaws the official European, Australian and Russian reaction in particular was confined to criticizing the death penalty and to some warnings against the fallout of the verdict on the Iraqi internal situation. Without underestimating both accounts this reaction fell short of Iraqi as well as Arab expectations: A farce trial orchestrated by an occupying power with the aim of changing a regime by an outside invading force outside the framework of international law should have had the priority to condemn as a matter of principle.
Saddam Hussein's purged "party comrades" may have more convincing grievances against his rule and could have a more credible case against him in court, but unlike their sectarian and ethnic counterparts --would not call in a foreign invasion to empower them to settle their accounts and did not hesitate for a moment, together with other national, pan-Arab and Islamic opposition to Saddam, regardless of sect or ethnicity, to join forces against the occupation of their country.
The issue at stake here is the foreign occupation that destroyed the Iraqi state and not the dictatorship or the democratic structure of an Iraqi regime in an occupied stateless country; all, Saddam inclusive, will be judged by where they stand vis-à-vis the occupation."
CURRENT AL-JAZEERA ONLINE POLL (ARABIC)
What should be the response to the Beit Hanoun massacre?
With 3,000 people responding so far, here are the results:
Stick with political and diplomatic means---4.3%
Escalate the resistance-------------------------95.7%
Nightmare in Beit Hanoun

How Gaza Offends Us All
A Great Piece and Strongly Recommended Reading
By JENNIFER LOEWENSTEIN
CounterPunch
Just an excerpt:
"An opened jaw with yellowed teeth gaped out of its bloodied shroud. The rest of the head parts were wrapped in a plastic bag placed atop the jaw and nostrils, as if to be close to the place to which it once belonged. The bag was red from the pieces that were stuffed inside it. Below the jaw was a human neck slit open midway down: a fleshy, wet wound smiling pink and oozing out from the browned skin around it, the neck that was still linked to the body below it. Above him, in the upper freezer of the morgue lay a dead woman, her red hennaed hair visible for the first time to strange men around her. More red plastic wrapped around an otherwise absent chin. She was dead for demonstrating outside a mosque in Beit Hanoun, northern Gaza where more than 60 men sheltered during the artillery onslaught by Israeli tanks and cannons.
Most of the others still had their faces intact. They lay on their silver morgue trays stiffly as unthawed frozen food. One man had a green Hamas band tied around his head; he looked like a gentle shepherd from some forgotten, pastoral age. Another's white eyes were partially opened, his face looking out in horror as if he'd died seeing it coming. Then a muddy, grizzled blob on the bottom left tray, black curls tangled and damped into its rounded head and blessedly shut eyes. A closer look revealed a child, a boy of 4: Majed, out playing his important childhood games when death came in like thunder and rolled him up in a million speckles of black mud. The other dead had already been taken away.
Today the hospitals will be filled beyond capacity again when the 18 civilian dead from a pre-dawn attack on Beit Hanoun -- women, men and children blasted out of their sleep into human chunks -- roll out of the ambulances and into the freezers of Shifa or Kamal Adwan hospitals in the northern Gaza Strip. How dare they sleep in their houses at night when the tanks are barking out commands.
Do you believe this was an accident? that an international investigation will ever take place? Like after Jenin? Like after Dan Halutz and his 2000 pound bomb which was dropped on an apartment building in Gaza City killing 15 people, 9 of them women and children? Like after the siege of Jabalya in the fall of 2004? Like after Operation Rainbow in Rafah? Like after Huda Ghalia's family was blasted into nothingness during an outing on a Gaza beach? Will US eyes, glued to their glaucousy TV screens to find out which marketed candidate won the corporate-managed midterm elections, ever know that that another massacre of Palestinians took place?
Ask Mark Regev, Israel's eager, hideously sincere government spokesperson. On CNN's international news he tells us in earnest that this is Israeli self-defense. The Qassam fire into Sderot and Ashkelon must stop. Israelis have the right to defend themselves. The "operation" in Beit Hanoun will not stop until the Qassams stop. Each word drivels out of his mouth into a bubble of obscenity for everyone watching from the vantage point of Gaza. Verbal pornography, sado-masochistic jargon from the prince of Hasbara leaks onto the dust like poisonous bile bought, paid for and sought after by the lords of power and their occupying machinery.
Because Israel does not want it to end. Because Israel wants the land and the resources without the people. Because you have to eviscerate a culture in order to maintain total control over it. Because the United States says that's just fine with us, you serve our purpose well. You help make the war on terror convenient. You help fit Iraq into the scheme. You'll help us with Iran as well. Who the hell cares about a million and a half poverty-stricken Gazans and their dust, their sand, their stinking, crumbling heap of a disaster area homeland?
What a terrible shame it is that Gazans have not yet attained the status of Human in the eyes of the Western powers, for the resistance there will continue to be an enigma until this changes. For now, however, the slaughter will continue unabated."
COMBAT BOOTS
The deconstruction of Iraq
Asia Times
In those heady early days after the invasion of Iraq, Washington handed Bechtel a contract to help reconstruct the country. At the same time it created a security force, the Facilities Protection Service, to guard the projects as well as existing ministries. Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily describe how Bechtel is slinking away after having accomplished nothing, while the security guards have morphed into cold-blooded killers.
Bechtel's billions down the drain
How security guards became killers
THE ASCENT OF CHIMP
A beacon of hope for the rebirth of Bolívar's dream
By Tariq Ali
"Daniel Ortega, blessed by the church, flanked by a former Contra as his vice-president and still loathed by the US ambassador, may be a sickly shadow of his former self, but his victory undoubtedly reflects the desire of Nicaraguans for change. Will Managua follow the radically redistributive policies of anti-imperialist Caracas or confine itself to rhetoric and remain a client of the International Monetary Fund?
Ortega's victory comes at a time when Latin America is on the march again. There have been some spectacular demonstrations of the popular will in Porto Alegre, Caracas, Buenos Aires, Cochabamba and Cuzco, to name but a few cities. This has offered a new hope to a world either deep in neoliberal torpor (the EU, the US, the Far East) or suffering from the military and economic depredations of the new order (Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, south Asia).
Chávez never concealed his politics. The two 18th-century Simóns - Bolívar and Rodríguez - had taught him a simple lesson: do not serve the interests of others; make your own political and economic revolution; and unite South America against all empires. This was the core of his programme.
In a speech in Havana in 1994, Chávez stated: "Bolivar once said that 'Political gangrene cannot be cured with palliatives', and Venezuela is totally and utterly infected with gangrene ... There is no way the system can cure itself ... 60% of Venezuelans live in poverty ... in 20 years more than $200bn just evaporated. So where is the money, President Castro asked me? In the foreign bank accounts of almost everyone who has been in power in Venezuela ... the coming century, in our opinion, is a century of hope; it is our century, it is the century when the Bolivarian dream will be reborn."
***
Will the Arabs act on a dream similar to the Bolivarian dream? The signs are not encouraging.
'I cannot see a day when we live in peace with them'

Rory McCarthy in Beit Hanoun
Thursday November 9, 2006
The Guardian
"Sanaa Athamna lay as if she slept, dead on a steel tray in the morgue of Beit Hanoun hospital. Across her forehead was a single, hairline fracture and beneath her eye a smudge of blood, the only visible marks of the destruction brought by the wave of Israeli artillery shells that struck her street in Beit Hanoun before dawn yesterday.
In her arms, hospital staff laid the bodies of her relatives: two sisters, Maysa, one, and Maram, three. Their mother Manal was also killed in yesterday's attack, but lay in a morgue at another hospital awaiting burial.
In all, 18 members of the extended Athamna family died when Israeli artillery struck their houses on Hamad Street. At least 14 of the dead were women and children. It was the biggest single Israeli strike in the Palestinian territories for four years and came only a day after the military had ended a six-day incursion in Beit Hanoun, a heavy battle which claimed more than 50 lives."
The blood of innocents

Leader
Thursday November 9, 2006
The Guardian
"Israel enjoys overwhelming military superiority over its Palestinian enemies, but there was no military or indeed any other logic to yesterday's killing of 18 people, at least 14 of them members of one sleeping family, in the northern Gaza Strip. International and regional reactions to the carnage were grimly predictable. The US called on Israel to exercise "restraint", noting its "regret" at civilian casualties and the launch of an inquiry into how a residential area had come under artillery fire. The EU said it was "appalled". The Palestinian movement Hamas called for swift retaliation. Islamic Jihad promised suicide bombings. Sadly, only the latter statements carried much conviction.
But Israel's actions, as in Lebanon this summer, have ignored the obligation to act in proportion to the threat, to avoid civilian casualties, and comply with international humanitarian law, which includes the personal responsibility of commanders for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Louise Arbour, the UN human rights commissioner, should formally remind the Israeli government of those principles when she visits Gaza and Jerusalem shortly.
It bears repeating that there are no military solutions to this conflict. Those who ignore that will always end up staining their hands with the blood of innocents."
We overcame our fear

The unarmed women of the Gaza Strip have taken the lead in resisting Israel's latest bloody assault
Jameela al-Shanti in Beit Hanoun
( Jameela al-Shanti is an elected member of the Palestinian Legislative Council for Hamas. She led a women's protest against the siege of Beit Hanoun last Friday)
The Guardian
"Yesterday at dawn, the Israeli air force bombed and destroyed my home. I was the target, but instead the attack killed my sister-in-law, Nahla, a widow with eight children in her care. In the same raid Israel's artillery shelled a residential district in the town of Beit Hanoun in the Gaza Strip, leaving 19 dead and 40 injured, many killed in their beds. One family, the Athamnas, lost 16 members in the massacre: the oldest who died, Fatima, was 70; the youngest, Dima, was one; seven were children. The death toll in Beit Hanoun has passed 90 in one week.
This is Israel's tenth incursion into Beit Hanoun since it announced its withdrawal from Gaza. It has turned the town into a closed military zone, collectively punishing its 28,000 residents. For days, the town has been encircled by Israeli tanks and troops and shelled. All water and electricity supplies were cut off and, as the death toll continued to mount, no ambulances were allowed in. Israeli soldiers raided houses, shut up the families and positioned their snipers on roofs, shooting at everything that moved. We still do not know what has become of our sons, husbands and brothers since all males over 15 years old were taken away last Thursday. They were ordered to strip to their underwear, handcuffed and led away.
It is not easy as a mother, sister or wife to watch those you love disappear before your eyes. Perhaps that was what helped me, and 1,500 other women, to overcome our fear and defy the Israeli curfew last Friday - and set about freeing some of our young men who were besieged in a mosque while defending us and our city against the Israeli military machine.
We faced the most powerful army in our region unarmed. The soldiers were loaded up with the latest weaponry, and we had nothing, except each other and our yearning for freedom. As we broke through the first barrier, we grew more confident, more determined to break the suffocating siege. The soldiers of Israel's so-called defence force did not hesitate to open fire on unarmed women. The sight of my close friends Ibtissam Yusuf abu Nada and Rajaa Ouda taking their last breaths, bathed in blood, will live with me for ever.
Later an Israeli plane shelled a bus taking children to a kindergarten. Two children were killed, along with their teacher. In the last week 30 children have died. As I go round the crowded hospital, it is deeply poignant to see the large number of small bodies with their scars and amputated limbs. We clutch our children tightly when we go to sleep, vainly hoping that we can shield them from Israel's tanks and warplanes.
But as though this occupation and collective punishment were not enough, we Palestinians find ourselves the targets of a systematic siege imposed by the so-called free world. We are being starved and suffocated as a punishment for daring to exercise our democratic right to choose who rules and represents us. Nothing undermines the west's claims to defend freedom and democracy more than what is happening in Palestine. Shortly after announcing his project to democratise the Middle East, President Bush did all he could to strangle our nascent democracy, arresting our ministers and MPs. I have yet to hear western condemnation that I, an elected MP, have had my home demolished and relatives killed by Israel's bombs. When the bodies of my friends and colleagues were torn apart there was not one word from those who claim to be defenders of women's rights on Capitol Hill and in 10 Downing Street.
Why should we Palestinians have to accept the theft of our land, the ethnic cleansing of our people, incarcerated in forsaken refugee camps, and the denial of our most basic human rights, without protesting and resisting?
The lesson the world should learn from Beit Hanoun last week is that Palestinians will never relinquish our land, towns and villages. We will not surrender our legitimate rights for a piece of bread or handful of rice. The women of Palestine will resist this monstrous occupation imposed on us at gunpoint, siege and starvation. Our rights and those of future generations are not open for negotiation.
Whoever wants peace in Palestine and the region must direct their words and sanctions to the occupier, not the occupied, the aggressor not the victim. The truth is that the solution lies with Israel, its army and allies - not with Palestine's women and children."
President pays the price but this could be Iraq turning point
Thursday November 9, 2006
The Guardian
"But while Mr Bush casts around, suggestions that Democrats have the answers on Iraq appear sadly misplaced. In the first place, they lack decisive power. Mr Bush remains arbiter-in-chief of America's foreign and security policy. More to the point, they have no coherent, collective view - and are scared of being accused of betraying frontline troops.
Hillary Clinton, the 2008 presidential hopeful, opposes an Iraq withdrawal timetable. John Kerry, beaten by Mr Bush in 2004, wants a firm deadline. John Murtha, who will control the House committee that appropriates cash for the Iraq war, has demanded an immediate pullout. Joe Biden, the senior Democrat on the Senate foreign relations committee, is advocating a tripartite division of Iraq. And there are many other points of view. All that unifies them is criticism of Mr Bush's performance.
But when it comes to Iran and North Korea's nuclear ambitions, Washington's pro-Israel bias, rising tensions with a reassertive Russia, and the developing strategic alliance with India that is designed to offset China's rise, the Democrats' approach differs little from that of the administration.
"President Bush doesn't have to worry about getting anyone elected in 2008 and appears to be thinking only about his place in history," Mr Kagan said. "That can lead him to act in ways that please Europeans - for instance, vigorous multilateral diplomacy on Iran and North Korea. But it could also take him in directions they will find worrisome if that diplomacy fails.
"Many around the world will thrill at the defeat of Republicans. They should enjoy the moment while they can. When the smoke clears, they will find themselves dealing with much the same America, with all its virtues and all its flaws.""
Republican defeat means the Iraqi insurgency has won
Simon Jenkins
Thursday November 9, 2006
The Guardian
"The ugly American mark two is dead. Overnight six years of glib European identification of "American" with rightwing fantasism is over. The gun-toting, pre-Darwinian Bushite, the tomahawk-wielding, Halliburton-loving, Beltway neocon calling abortion murder and torturing Arabs as "Islamofascists" has been laid to rest, and by a decision of the American people. Another McCarthy raised its head over the western horizon and has been slapped down. It is a good day for level-headed Americans.
Over 60% of electors want US troops withdrawn from Iraq now or soon. Reports from Baghdad indicate expectation and relief that American policy in that country is about to change. The US army wants to leave. The government ran on a pro-war ticket and suffered a resounding rebuff. At this point the insurgency knows it has won, however long it takes the occupying power to go. Retreat in good order is the best hope. An era of ill-conceived, belligerent interventionism has come to an end - by democratic decision, thank goodness."
No more apologies

By Yossi Sarid
Haaretz
"It's morning in Beit Hanun. A family gets up, and after week of killing and destruction, decides it may at last send the children to kindergarten and school.
Suddenly the shell lands on the house. The children, still in their pajamas, go back to sleep. The "open areas" (where the IDF says it targeted its shells), again fill with bodies and blood, because in the most crowded, cursed place on earth there is no such thing as an open or safe area.
Please, I beg you, do not tell us you feel sorrow, and do not apologize. On no account apologize again, after who-knows-how-many times - all of them wasted apologies. "The IDF regrets" sounds exactly like "the IDF is investigating." Try living with this death and you'll probably succeed. You've tried before and survived.
Eighteen people were killed by one stray shell, most of them women and children. This achievement is better than the previous one: Three weeks ago, an officer announced to his soldiers the astounding result: 12:0 in our favor. Yesterday the result was 18:0 and it could improve in injury time. Go Israel!
The majors general, brigadiers general and colonels in the South are teaching their colleagues in the North how to score a victory.
The Autumn Clouds dispersed yesterday, it was reported, and the Gaza skies cleared for a moment. But we know from experience that it isn't over till it's over, and it can only be over with multiple killing. Only now, with the shell's arrival, will it really be over until it starts again, when Olmert and Peretz and Halutz and Galant and Tamir no longer hear the blood crying out to them from the earth.
Had they but heard, they would long ago have draped themselves in black flags and vanished from our lives, from our deaths. But no, they persist in continuing, in giving orders, in dragging this country down to hell. It's as though they were saying, "let our soul die with the dead."
One gets the impression that in the last few days, the chief of staff has once again been preoccupied with his bank account, and has not taken the time to check his account in the blood bank. "
Forget about recognizing Israel
"On the political level, there is no doubt that yesterday's deaths, on top of those of the 53 other residents of the area killed in Israel Defense Forces operations in Beit Hanun over the last few days, greatly weakened Abu Mazen in his negotiations with Hamas over establishment of a national unity government. "How is it possible, at a time like this, to speak about recognition of and friendship with Israel?" demanded the speakers at a large student demonstration at Al-Quds University, in the East Jerusalem suburb of Abu Dis. At similar demonstrations throughout the West Bank and Gaza yesterday, participants voiced their pain, anger and demands for revenge. But what stood out above all was the fact that a kind of unity had been created among all the rival factions: All declared that there was no point in peace negotiations with Israel and expressed opposition to Abu Mazen's moderate political path.
As a result, there is growing public pressure on Hamas to respond with "at least one major attack," as one Arab journalist in East Jerusalem said yesterday. The PA declared a three-day mourning strike, and Palestinian spokesmen expressed the hope that the bloodshed would finally rouse the Arab states to cease the boycott they have imposed on the Pale stinian government and people and resume fund transfers to Gaza and the West Bank."
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
THE LATEST FROM LATUFF
لا تستنجدوا بالزعماء العرب
لم يعد المرء قادراً علي احصاء عدد الشهداء، فهم يتزايدون في كل لحظة، وفي كل ساعة، فقد تشابهت المجازر وتكررت، وكل يوم جديد يحمل مجزرة جديدة. الضحايا انفسهم، والوجوه السمراء المؤمنة المطحونة نفسها، اطفال جوعي بملابس تكاد لا تستر اجسادهم الطرية، سيدات شهيدات، واخريات يندبن الشهداء من ابناء، بنات، ابناء عم، ابناء خال، زوج، أب، ام، او جميعهم، مثلما كان حال اسرة العثامنة التي قضت عليها قذائف المدفعية الاسرائيلية في مدينة بيت حانون الصامدة، ولم تبق من اطفالها السبعة، أحداً علي قيد الحياة، انضموا الي قوافل الشهداء مع والديهم واقاربهم.
نفهم ان يقف العالم الغربي المتحضر موقف المتفرج علي هذه المجازر، ولا يفاجئنا الدعم الامريكي لها باعتبارها دفاعا اسرائيليا عن النفس، ولكن ما يقهرنا هو هذه اللامبالاة العربية الرسمية والشعبية معا، وكأن قتل الاطفال الفلسطينيين وهم يتثاءبون استعدادا للذهاب الي مدارسهم امر عادي ومشروع.
نشعر بأسي عندما تسأل النساء الثكالي عن العرب، وجيوشهم، وحكامهم، لعل صرخات النجدة هذه التي يعلمن انه لن يستمع اليها أحد، أو حتي لو سمعوها فإنهم يديرون وجوههم الي الناحية الاخري، او يغلقون التلفاز، او يبحثون عن محطة اخري فيها من الطرب والرقص ما يروح عنهم صرخات من قبيل الهذيان التي تطلق في اللحظات العصيبة، فالفلسطينيون، مثلهم مثل اشقائهم العراقيين، يدركون جيداً ان دماء الحياء والشهامة باتت متجمدة، أو بالأحري غير موجودة في وجوه معظم الزعماء العرب وقادة جيوشهم.
ربما لا نبالغ اذا قلنا ان مجرد استنجاد الصامدين المجاهدين في الاراضي المحتلة هو تكريم لهؤلاء الزعماء لا يستحقونه، وشرف ليسوا اهلا له، ولذلك نتوسل الي هؤلاء الشرفاء الذين يدافعون عن كرامة هذه الأمة وعقيدتها ان ينسوا القادة العرب، ويتصرفوا وكأنهم ليسوا موجودين، واذا استنجدوا فمن الأجدي ان يستنجدوا بالقادة الآسيويين والافارقة، والامريكيين الجنوبيين من امثال اورتيغا وشافيز، أو باحمدي نجاد، او فلاديمير بوتين لان احتمالات ان يستجيب هؤلاء اكبر بكثير من معظم القادة العرب.
فالسيد عمر سليمان رئيس المخابرات المصرية ومبعوث الرئيس مبارك لن يهرع الي بيت حانون بحثا عن اشلاء ضحايا المجزرة الاسرائيلية من اطفالها، مثلما فعل مهرولا للبحث عن اعضاء جندي اسرائيلي فجر فلسطينيون دبابته في رفح، مهددا متوعدا بعظائم الامور اذا لم يحصل عليها فورا لإعادتها الي شارون حتي يتمكن اهل الجندي من اتمام مراسم دفنه وفق الشريعة اليهودية.
القيادة المصرية المسؤولة اخلاقيا وقانونيا عن كل طفل في قطاع غزة لا تستطيع فتح معبر رفح الحدودي، وتعزز حراسة حدودها لمنع وصول رصاصة واحدة الي رجال المقاومة، ولكنها لم تكف ومنذ ثلاثة اشهر عن السعي للافراج عن الجندي الاسرائيلي الأسير لعلها تنال رضا ايهود اولمرت، تمهيداً لنيل رضا المعلم الاكبر جورج بوش، مما يسهل عملية التوريث التي تضعها علي قمة اولوياتها بينما يتراجع الأمن القومي المصري الي ذيلها.
ولعل مصيبتنا الكبري هي ما يقوله السيد محمود عباس رئيس السلطة من تصريحات تنزل برداً وسلاماً علي قلب ايهود اولمرت وليبرمان وحالوتس كأن يركز هجومه علي مطلقي الصواريخ علي المستوطنات الاسرائيلية بكلمات قاسية، مبرراً هذه المجازر ومعفيا هؤلاء من أي لوم.
لم نسمع، وعلي مدي ستين عاما من متابعتنا للصراع العربي ـ الاسرائيلي، ان زعيماً اسرائيلياً، من اقصي اليمين او اقصي اليسار، قد قال وفي ذروة الغضب من جراء عملية استشهادية في قلب تل ابيب، ان الغارات والتوغلات الاسرائيلية في الضفة وغزة تعطي الذرائع لفصائل المقاومة، لإرسال الاستشهاديين المزنرين بالأحزمة الناسفة الي شارع ديزنغوف، او مدينة الخضيرة، او في القدس المحتلة.
فالمنطق يقول ان يركز السيد عباس باعتباره رئيسا لهذا الشعب المنكوب، علي الجرائم الاسرائيلية التي لا يمكن تبريرها بأي شكل من الاشكال، لانها لا يمكن ان تقارن بأي عمل فدائي فلسطيني. ولكن يبدو ان منطق السيد عباس من نوع آخر نتمني ان نعرف مصدره، لانه لا يمت بأي صلة لقيمنا وتراثنا وعقيدتنا.
اسرائيل لا تريد ذرائع لارتكاب مجازرها، فهل كان الفلسطينيون يطلقون صواريخ عندما ارتكبت مجازر دير ياسين والقبية وصبرا وشاتيلا؟ نسأل السيد عباس ونحن ندرك جيدا انه يعرف الاجابة.
الفلسطينيون لا يملكون صواريخ كروز ولا توماهوك ولا حتي الكاتيوشا ، لانهم محاصرون بأنظمة عربية ترتعد خوفا من اصغر شاويش امريكي، علي عكس ايران التي فتحت ترساناتها لحزب الله، ليغرف منها ما شاء من الأسلحة والصواريخ والذخائر والاموال.
نفهم، ولكن لا نقبل، ان يمتنع الزعماء العرب عن نجدة الثكالي في رفح وبيت حانون وجنين ونابلس، ونفهم ولا نتفهم، اغلاق حدودهم بإحكام لمنع وصول اسلحة الي رجال المقاومة، ولكن لا نفهم ولا نتفهم ولا نتقبل خضوعهم لهذا الحصار المالي التجويعي لأكثر من ثلاثة ملايين فلسطيني يموتون جوعا بسبب الحصارين الامريكي والاسرائيلي.
القادة الافارقة كسروا الحصار الجوي علي ليبيا وركبوا طائراتهم وحطوا في مطاراتها تحديا للغطرسة الامريكية، ولكننا لم نسمع ان زعيما عربيا واحدا تحركت كرامته ودماء النخوة في عروقه، وقرر كسر الحصار المالي، ولا نقول العسكري المفروض علي الفلسطينيين.
الغارات والصواريخ والقذائف الاسرائيلية قتلت حتي الآن اكثر من 500 فلسطيني واعتقلت 1500 آخرين بينهم وزراء ونواب برلمان، منذ اسر الجندي الاسرائيلي، فأي عدالة هذه وأي انبطاح امامها من قبل العالم بأسره وعلي رأسهم الحكومات العربية، انها عدالة نازية، عدالة شايلوك. فالتوراة التي يؤمنون بها تقول العين بالعين والسن بالسن، ولكننا نري 500 عين مقابل عين واحدة، و500 سن مقابل سن واحدة، والاخطر من هذا ان الجندي الاسرائيلي الأسير ما زال حيا يرزق.
القيادة السياسية الفلسطينية برأسيها، يجب ان تتحمل مسؤوليتها وان تتصرف بطريقة ترتقي الي مستوي الحدث. فأمر مخجل ان يكون هناك من يصدق انه رئيس سلطة او رئيس حكومة او وزير ويناديهم البعض من المنافقين بفخامة الرئيس او دولة رئيس الوزراء، وكأن هناك دولة او رئاسة.
قلناها، ونقولها، ان وجود هذه السلطة أحد ابرز الاعذار لهذه المجازر الاسرائيلية، فعندما لا تحمي شعبها، ولا تكسر الحصار المفروض عليه، وتخفف من معاناته، فما هي فائدتها ولماذا تستمر؟
لا بد من العودة الي المربع الاول، مربع المقاومة للإحتلال وإزالة كل ما قام علي باطل اوسلو والعودة الي صيغة محدثة لمنظمة التحرير الفلسطينية، والانضمام الي معسكر الكرامة الدولي المعادي لهذه العجرفة الامريكية المتوحشة والارهابية.
Meanwhile in Palestine
Bloodbath in Gaza: Hamas Urges Attacks Against America: Hamas' exiled leader, Khaled Mashaal, says a 2005 truce with Israel is finished and appealed to all Palestinian factions to resume attacks: "There must be a roaring reaction so that we avenge all those victims." Israeli tank shells ripped through a residential neighborhood in the northern Gaza Strip early Wednesday, killing at least 18 members of an extended family, including eight children as they slept
Survivors tell harrowing tales of Israeli barrage: Scorched fragments of clothes, a girl's slipper and body parts lay strewn in pools of blood in front of a row of houses that was riddled by what witnesses said was an Israeli artillery strike today while Palestinian residents slept.
Gaza media: It's Palestine's Qana massacre: "We pulled out bodies, all women and children, dismembered, without heads or hands," says Khaled Abu Saada, a Palestinian ambulance driver who evacuated the wounded to hospitals
International Red Cross 'appalled' by deaths in Gaza: The international Red Cross said it was "appalled" that 18 people — mostly women and children — had been killed during Israeli military operations Wednesday in the northern Gaza Strip.
Study: 57 unarmed Palestinian minors killed by IDF since June : A third of unarmed Palestinians killed during IDF operations in the Gaza Strip since the abduction of Gilad Shalit have been minors, according to a new report prepared by Physicians for Human Rights, to be published Wednesday.
Israel: Divorce America, Marry Russia: Although few Israelis realize it, Israel has strategic options that it didn't have 15 years ago. In many respects, Russia is a much more suitable partner for Israel than the US.
Meanwhile in Iraq
Iraq: At least 52 killed as U.S. occupation grinds on: - Police found six bodies with gunshot wounds in different parts of Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad, police said.
21 killed in apparent tit-for-tat mortar attacks in occupied Baghdad: The attack appeared to have been in response to mortar fire on a Sunni neighborhood across the Tigris River earlier in the day that killed seven people and wounded 25.
Mortar Kills 8 at Baghdad Soccer Field : Mortar rounds strike soccer field in Baghdad Shiite district, killing 8 and wounding 20
1,500 Baathists killed in south : Assassinating former members of Saddam Hussein’s Baath Party is going on unabated particularly in southern Iraq, according to an independent group monitoring human rights in Iraq.
Juba the Baghdad sniper eclipses Saddam's call for reconciliation: Juba, whose name is taken from an African death dance, is shown marking off his kills on a wall before he lays down his sniper rifle. He then writes an ode to Allah (God) and calls on Iraqis to fight the crusaders and Jews.
Bush: Donald Rumsfeld Stepping Down: President Bush announced Rumsfeld's departure and Gates' nomination at an afternoon news conference. Administration officials notified congressional officials in advance.
Iraq exit the No 1 priority for Rumsfeld successor: Robert Gates, the 63-year-old career intelligence officer chosen to replace Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, takes over with the clearest of missions: get American troops out of Iraq as quickly and cleanly as possible.
National Unity Government is victory for Hamas

AN ANALYSIS
By Khalid Amayreh
Nov 8, 2006, 18:07
"Occupied Jerusalem - The impending agreement between Fatah and Hamas to form a government of national unity should be viewed as a resounding victory for Hamas. Hamas’ resilience, patience, and stubborn determination to hang on despite draconian western, Israeli and Arab pressure seem to have paid off.
The West, led by the United States, which is often at Israel’s beck and call, had hoped that the harsh sanctions against the Palestinian people would cause an implosion within the Palestinian society and prompt the suffering Palestinian masses to topple Hamas as had happened in several countries facing similar circumstances.
True, the sanctions, including the arrogation by Israel of Palestinian taxes revenues, estimated at more than 700 million US dollars, as well as the shameless American bullying of Arab and Palestinian banks to refrain from transferring Arab aid money to the cash-strapped Palestinian government, nearly crippled the Palestinian economy, impoverished Palestinians, probably as never before, and pushed tens of thousands of Palestinian families to the brink of starvation.
However, the Palestinian people, despite looming starvation and deepening poverty, must have realized that the real motive behind the claustrophobic sanctions was not really Hamas’ head but rather the movement’s dogged insistence on freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people. To put it bluntly, America and Israel wanted to force the Palestinian people to give up their national rights, including the right to have a state with Jerusalem as its capital and abandon the inalienable right of millions of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and towns in what is now Israel. Hence, the Palestinians, or to be more accurate, a majority of them, refused to be duped by the Americans and their collaborators and agents into revolting against Hamas.
The main issue still to be resolved is the choice of the next prime minister. Hamas had proposed Dr. Basem Naim, the current Minister of Health, a professor of medicine as the next prime minister. Naim is associated but not closely affiliated with Hamas. The PA president, however, rejected this choice arguing that the next prime minister ought to be a more independent-minded figure. It is expected that within days, Fatah and Hamas will agree on a compromise prime ministerial candidate.
There are two more issues seemingly impeding the early conclusion of an agreement between the two sides. The first is Hamas’ insistence that Abbas obtain from the United States and EU a commitment to lift the sanctions, once the new government is formed. Abbas obviously can’t possibly force western powers to undertake such a commitment, at least at this stage. However, it is likely that he will eventually get a commitment of some sort from the Americans and the Europeans to lift the sanctions or at least press Israel to release hundreds of millions of dollars of Palestinian customs revenue money levied by Israel but withheld for the purpose of punishing the Palestinians for electing the Hamas movement. The US might also signal to some Arab states that they could resume financial aid to the virtually bankrupt PA.
The second obstacle is Hamas’ demand that a prisoner swap between Israel and the Palestinians take place before the formation of the government. Abbas, however, argued convincingly that he had no authority over Israeli government decisions and that in any case Palestinian national interests shouldn’t be held hostage to Israeli whims.
According to insiders in Fatah and Hamas, these two issues are not very serious and are likely to be settled very soon, which enforces hopes that a final breakthrough is within reach.
The turnabout in Abbas’ approach to Hamas has left observers wondering as to what made him abandon his erstwhile threats to dissolve the Hamas-led government, the Hamas-dominated parliament, declare a government of emergency and call for early general elections.
Some observers here cite the latest Israeli rampage of murder and terror in northern Gaza, which has so far resulted in the death of over 60 Palestinians, the vast bulk of them innocent civilians, and the maiming and wounding of dozens others, as a central factor that strongly militated against any contemplated steps by Abbas against Hamas. Indeed, a coup by Fatah against Hamas under such circumstances would have made Abbas and his Fatah party look as unashamed collaborators with Israel, not only against Hamas, but against the Palestinian people and its just cause. And this would have proven a political suicide for the former ruling party of the PA.
Second, it is very likely that Abbas has received a certain message of late from the Bush administration informing him that the US wouldn’t actively oppose the formation of a government of technocrats as long as such a government agreed to renounce armed struggle, recognize Israel and accept outstanding international agreements pertaining to the Israeli-Palestinian strife. Interestingly, the draft agreement between Hamas and Fatah doesn’t explicitly stipulate recognition of Israel but supports the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel, which could be construed as a tacit recognition of Israel.
On Monday, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was quoted as saying that the US would rather see Hamas “inside” than “outside” the government. Similarly, British Prime Minister Tony Blair made similar statements, saying that Britain would talk to Hamas if it accepted the conditions set up by the international community.
In the light of such circumstances, it is possible to assume that the US, whose erstwhile policy toward Hamas was so vindictive, even sadistic, and primarily aimed at isolating the movement and triggering a popular revolt against its government in Gaza, is now reconsidering some aspects of that policy. The main reason for that seems to be a realization by the Americans that after all the economic, financial and street pressure failed to unseat Hamas or even seriously undermine its popularity among Palestinians.
There is a third important factor which may have prompted Abbas and Fatah to seek a compromise with Hamas. This lies in the educated presumption that in any new elections in the occupied Palestinian territories, Fatah has no guarantee whatsoever that it won’t lose again to Hamas, despite the growing poverty and the social-economic crisis facing the Palestinians. This view is corroborated by several opinion polls published in the occupied territories recently, showing that Hamas has, by and large, been able to retain its erstwhile popularity. On Tuesday, 7 November, an opinion poll released by the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion in Beit Sahur and supervised by Dr. Nabil Kukali showed that over 75% of Palestinians blamed the US, Israel, EU and Fatah for the financial-economic crisis in the occupied territories.
This alone underscores the utter failure of the conspiratorial American, Israeli (and Arab) designs against the Hamas-led government, namely pressuring and blackmailing the Palestinian masses into revolting against and ousting Hamas.
And, yes, Hamas has been able to retain its dignity and stature as a resilient Islamic and national movement that wouldn’t budge under pressure. Indeed, it is quite safe to assume that any other political movement facing the same pressure and same throttling sanctions would have buckled a long time ago. Hamas has not only refused to buckle, it can argue convincingly that it has not given up its principles, while remaining a force to be reckoned with, not only at the Palestinian arena but also in the Arab region as a whole."
Hezbollah S.G. condemns Beit Hanoun massacre; stresses money, arms and medicine should be sent to steadfast Palestinians

"Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah said in a statement Wednesday that the savage Israeli massacre in Beit Hanoun is a new witness on the racist and hegemonic nature of this enemy, and constitutes a new chapter in a series of this entity's moving massacres, especially in Palestine and Lebanon since its creation. His eminence's statement added: " Children are the same from Qana to Beit Hanoun, the Women are the same the blood is one and the honor, fate and battle are one." "Once again, scenes of body parts, blood and tears as well as the cries of the mothers bereaving their children, move us as the world stands silent and submissive. Where are the Arabs? Where are the Arab rulers? Where are their live powers? Where are their proud peoples? Where is the Arab scream of anger in the face of the butchers, to deter them and make them feel that more killings will take them to the end. The least duty of the nation and the peoples at this stage, is to firmly condemn the criminal nature of the Zionists, to express resentment in every possible means and to work on ending the blockade of the Palestinian people. Money, arms and medicine should be sent to this steadfast people who, with confidence in Allah and with its brave fighters and its patience, can repeat the victory that occurred in Lebanon. The whole nation is in front of new an key test and we should shoulder responsibility." "
another attack against Beit Hanoun Vilage

Latest From Dr. Mona El-Farra
"this morning 6.30 am , army tanks on the east of the vilage fired missiles against some homes of Beit Hanoun vILAGHE ,the outcome was disasterous , 11, members opf one family were killed , total death toll is 22 , and may increase in the next hoyurs , the injuries are serious and very critical , including many women and children
here in Palestine we have the choice of dying or continuing to refuse injustice , and struggle to reach our national inaleinable goals
the international community knows verwell what is the Geneva fourth covintion , no need to remind you of civilians protection in war and peace time
Israel new geneva convintion intrepretation is kill more and more of civilians
mona
alawda hospital -jabalia"
See More of DR. El-Farra's Photos
"Palestinian medical sources reported that dozens of Palestinian citizens had been killed or injured in an Israeli artillery bombardment of Beit Hanoun in the
north of Gaza Strip. A large number of women and children were also injured in the shelling.
The sources said the preliminary number of the citizens killed is 18, but rising. In addition, more than 35 were injured. Many of the dead arrived at the
hospital fragmented in pieces.
The bombing targeted the house of two brothers, Sa'ed and Sa'di Al-'Athamneh from Al-Kafarneh district in the town of Beit Hanoun.
Eleven members of the Al-'Athamneh family were killed, including a one-year old girl. The killed are:
Ne'meh Al-'Athamneh
Mohammed Al-'Athamneh
Mahmoud Al-'Athamneh
Mahdi Al-'Athamneh
Sa'ed Al-'Athamneh
Mohammed Al-'Athamneh
Fatmeh Al-'Athamneh
Nihad Al-'Athamneh
Arafat Al-'Athamneh
Dima Al-'Athamneh (1 year old girl)
Another young girl, Ala' Al-'Athamneh
The medical services are identifying the rest of the dead but it is proving difficult to identify them due to their fragmented bodies and the critical condition in which they arrived at the Kamal 'Udwan Hospital in Beit Lahiya. In Kamal 'Udwan Hospital, there are 12 dead and in Kamal Naser Hospital there are 4 dead. The number of people killed is raising by the minute.
Eyewitnesses said that the Israeli artillery bombed the houses while the residents were sleeping, resulting in the large number of casualties.
Palestinians are comparing this massacre to the Qana massacre by the Israeli army in south Lebanon 3 months ago."
The Iraq Mandate
"For the first time in American history, Americans have gone to the polls in wartime and rejected that war. Not only that, but they’ve done so overwhelmingly. Just as the election of 1932 was a seismic repudiation of the failed economic policies of the Hoover Republicans, the election of 2006 was a landslide against the Bush Republicans and their criminally misguided war against Iraq."
While You Voted, Palestinians Died

By Kurt Nimmo
"No matter who wins the midterm election, be it Democrats or Republicans, the slaughter in Palestine will continue.
In fact, it is a safe bet to conclude that the vast majority of the winners, and indeed most of the losers, support the criminal state of Israel, infamous for using U.S. supplied weapons to kill Palestinian school children.
Israel’s slaughter, fully supported by the neocons and most of our “representatives” sitting in Congress, is not even a campaign issue. Staunch support for Israel is a given. Pervert preachers may be paraded across the front page of newspapers and websites, but you will not see one photo of critically wounded children ushered into the hospital in Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip.
“The bodies arrived one after another on the shoulders of a seemingly endless river of mourners,” the Mercury News reported as I showed my ID to a volunteer at the senior citizens center where I voted earlier this afternoon.
“One was a small boy weighing no more than 60 pounds, tightly encased in a green Hamas flag. Another was only pieces, placed in a box and hustled down the street on a stretcher.” "
Massacre in Beit Hanoun

Yousef Alhelou writing from Beit Hanoun, occupied Gaza Strip, Live from Palestine, 8 November 2006
"One day after the Israel army declared that it had pulled out and completed Operation Autumn Clouds in the northern Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanoun, 24 Palestinians were killed in Gaza and the West Bank, 19 people were killed and at least 45 were injured as a large number of shells were fired at the town. Another five Palestinians were killed in Jenin, northern West Bank by Israeli army fire.
The series of incidents began at 6 a.m., when eyewitness said that dozens of tank shells and missiles landed simultaneously in a small and limited area in Beit Hanoun. Ambulances found it difficult to evacuate the wounded. According to Palestinian sources, some of the shells landed on a house, killing 11 members of one family called Al-A'athamein, including a nine-year-old child and a 73-year-old woman. Israeli sources confirmed that artillery shells were fired Wednesday morning. Incredibly, they said it was not yet known whether the matter was a technical error or a human one.
Sources in Gaza reported that some of those killed were hurt after shells hit a group of civilians who arrived to aid those hurt in the first barrage. Residents in the area were called to donate blood for fear that the number of casualties would be higher. Khaled Radi, a Palestinian Health Ministry official, said all the dead were civilians. He said seven children and four women were among the dead.
Radi also said at least 45 more were wounded, all civilians. Four hospitals are treating the wounded across Gaza. Emergency and first aid director in the ministry of health, Dr Moa'aweyah Hasanein announced that the latest round of Israeli war crimes in Gaza has resulted in a new massacre in the northern town of Beit Hanoun. Nineteen innocent civilians, including seven children and four women, have been murdered brutally as they slept in their own house. This brings this week's toll alone to around 80 Palestinian martyrs and more than 350 have been injured.
Palestinian Health Minister Bassem Naim referred to the trend of similar incidents, saying that killing constitutes a policy and a target for the Israelis. He stated, "I have no words to describe the ugly Israeli massacre in Beit Hanoun this morning." According to Naim, "This massacre is added to another massacre which the town has only just emerged from. This morning's operation only proves that killing is Israel's target, and this is proved by the massive fire at the medical teams arriving at the area." Naim added that more proof was the inclusion into the Israeli government Avigdor Lieberman, who openly calls for the killing Palestinians.
"The massacre in Beit Hanoun proves that the Israeli government is committing war crimes against civilians," said Israeli Knesset member Talab El-Sana after the incident. "Palestinian children and women are murdered in their homes and in their beds. Olmert, Peretz and Halutz are war criminals who failed the first war and are committing war crimes in the second war." He called for "the end of the ongoing slaughter" and said "tanks cannot kill the dream of a people aspiring to independence and freedom." "
UN human rights expert calls for urgent action on Gaza

Report, UNHCR, 8 November 2006
"Prof. John Dugard, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, issued the following statement today:
On 25 June 2006 Israel embarked on a military operation in Gaza that has resulted in over 300 deaths, including many civilians; over a thousand injuries; large-scale devastation of public facilities and private homes; the destruction of agricultural lands; the disruption of hospitals, clinics and schools; the denial of access to adequate electricity, water and food; and the occupation and imprisonment of the people of Gaza. This brutal collective punishment of a people, not a government, has passed largely unnoticed by the international community.
The Quartet, comprising the United Nations, the European Union, the United States and the Russian Federation, has done little to halt Israel's attacks. Worse still, the Security Council has failed to adopt any resolution on the subject or attempt to restore peace to the region. The time has come for urgent action on the part of the Security Council. Failure to act at this time will seriously damage the reputation of the Security Council. "
Amnesty International delegate visits scene of Gaza Strip killings

Report, Amnesty International, 8 November 2006
"The killing this morning of 18 civilians in the Palestinian town of Beit Hanoun, victims of Israeli shelling, was an appalling act, Amnesty International said today. The organization called for an immediate, independent investigation and for those responsible to be held accountable. It said previous Israeli investigations, such as that carried out into the killings of a Palestinian family on a beach in the Gaza Strip last June, had been seriously inadequate and failed to meet international standards for such investigations, which must be independent, impartial and thorough.
Those killed, most of whom were asleep in their beds when their homes were struck by shells fired by Israeli forces, included eight children. An Amnesty International delegate who visited the scene of the killings shortly after the attack was told that 15 of the victims were killed in the first strike and that three others were killed by a second shell as they raced to help the dead and injured.
"This terrible act follows a renewed upsurge in killings of Palestinians since Israel forces launched their latest military operation into the Gaza Strip on 2 November," said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International's Middle East and North Africa programme. "Israeli actions during this entire operation have been marked by nothing less than reckless disregard for the lives of Palestinian civilians, over 20 of whom had been killed even before this morning's tragedy."
Amnesty International condemns all attacks on unarmed civilians and is calling on the Israeli authorities to establish independent investigations into every incident in which Palestinian civilians were killed or injured by Israeli forces, and to bring to justice those responsible for human rights violations.
As Israeli forces began their siege of Beit Hanoun, one senior officer, Lieutenant Colonel Yarom, said that troops had been instructed to avoid causing civilian casualties. Four days into the operation, in face of a rising toll of deaths and injuries among Palestinian civilians, Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert declared: "Those Palestinians who have been wounded were mostly armed, but, to our regret,they are using innocent people as human shields, resulting in the injury of uninvolved civilians as well".
The information gathered by Amnesty International delegates currently in the Gaza Strip contradicts this, however, and indicates that at least half of those killed, including at least two women and several children, were unarmed bystanders not involved in the confrontations. The pattern is the same for those injured as a result of Israeli force air strikes and artillery shelling."
Occupying army kills 18 civilians in the shelling of Beit Hanoun

Report, PCHR, 8 November 2006
In a Form of Systematic Massive Killing, IOF Kill 18 Palestinian Civilians, Including 8 Children and 6 Women, and Wound 55 Others in Beit Hanoun
"In a serious escalation in crimes they commit in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), on Wednesday morning, 8 November 2006, Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) shelled a residential area in the northern Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanoun, killing 18 Palestinian civilians, including 17 members of the al-'Athamna family, and wounding 55 others. Most of the victims were sleeping in their homes when the attack took place. IOF fired at least 10 artillery shells at the area. This crime has come only one day after the IOF redeployment from the town, following a 7-day incursion, during which IOF committed a series of crimes. Thus, the number of Palestinians killed by IOF since the beginning of the military campaign against Beit Hanoun has increased to 76, mostly civilians, including 17 children and 9 women. In addition, at least 250 others have been wounded.
According to investigations conducted by PCHR, at approximately 05:20 on Wednesday, 8 November 2006, IOF positioned at the border between the Gaza Strip and Israel, east and north of Beit Hanoun, fired at least 10 artillery shells at a residential area in the northeast of the town. A number of these shells hit two apartment buildings belonging to the heirs of 'Abdullah al-'Athamna. As a result 16 members of the family were killed, and dozens of other were wounded. A number of neighbors, mostly relatives of the family, rushed to rescue the family. Immediately, IOF fired a number of shells at the area. As a result, a member of the al-'Athamna family and another civilian were killed. In addition, at least 10 civilians, mostly members of the al-'Athamna family, were wounded.
Those killed by this attack are:
1. Fatema Ahmed al-'Athamna, 70;
2. Sanaa' Ahmed al-'Athamna, 30;
3. Ne'ma Ahmed al-'Athamna, 55;
4. Mas'oud 'Abdullah al-'Athamna, 55;
5. Sabah Mohammed al-'Athamna, 45;
6. Sameer Mas'oud al-'Athamna, 23;
7. Fatema Mas'oud al-'Athamna, 16;
8. 'Arafat Sa'ad al-'Athamna, 17;
9. Mahdi Sa'ad al-'Athamna, 13;
10. Mohammed Sa'ad al-'Athamna, 14;
11. Sa'ad Majdi al-'Athamna, 8;
12. Mahmoud Amjad al-'Athamna, 12;
13. Malak Sameer al-'Athamna, 4;
14. Maisaa' Ramzi al-'Athamna, 4;
15. Nihad Mohammed al-'Athamna, 33;
16. Mohammed Ramadan al-'Athamna, 28;
17. Manal Mohammed al-'Athamna, 35; and
18. Saqer Mohammed 'Edwan, 45."
Israeli tank shells 'kill 18 Palestinians in sleep'
By Ibrahim Barzak, AP
Published: 08 November 2006
Israeli tank shells killed at least 18 people in their sleep when they landed in Gaza early today, witnesses report. Eight children were said to be among the dead.
Khaled Radi, a health ministry official, said of the 18 dead, 13 were from the same family. He said at least 40 more were wounded, all civilians after the attack on a residential neighbourhood north of Beit Hanoun.
Palestinian hospital officials said there were several more injured. According to witnesses, all those killed were women and children.
Four hospitals are treating the wounded across Gaza.
Palestinian security officials said that five tank shells landed in the area within 15 minutes. Most the casualties were caused to a row of homes belonging to members of one family.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas strongly condemned the attack.
"This is a horrible, ugly massacre committed by the occupation against our children, our women and elderly in Beit Hanoun," he said in a statement. "We urge and call the security council to convene immediately to stop the massacres committed against our people and to uphold their responsibility to stop these massacres.".
The Palestinian cabinet convened for an emergency meeting.
Hamas spokesman Ghazi Hamad called for Israel to be expelled from the United Nations, calling it an "animal, brutal state."
In a huge demonstration outside the morgue at the Kamal Adwan hospital in the northern Gaza Strip, thousands called for revenge.
"We are going to fight against the so-called Israel. We are going to launch our rockets, our martyrs are going to sacrifice their lives in the depths of our occupied land," said Nizar Rayan, a Hamas leader in northern Gaza. "They will strike in Jaffa, in Haifa, inside Ashdod. The battle will continue. The rifle is not going to be set down. All of us are martyrs in waiting. revenge is coming."
The Islamic Jihad militant group also called for revenge after the tank attack.
"Martyrdom is coming," it said in a statement, referring to suicide bombings. "The response will not take long, because the time is ready for punishment, and the time is ready for revenge."
The Israeli army had immediate comment on the attack.
Thousands gathered outside hospitals weeping as the bodies arrived. Witnesses said that many of the dead arrived in their sleeping clothes. Schoolchildren swept out to the street to protest the attack as mosques broadcast angry speeches on the street.
Dozens of schoolchildren were trying to storm an empty EU mission building in Gaza City, according to witnesses, throwing stones and bottles. Palestinian security is trying to prevent them from entering the building.
Rahwi Hamad, 75, said he was awoken by the sound of explosions at about 5:15 a.m. and emerged from his home to find body parts and pools of blood in the streets.
"I saw people coming out of the house, bleeding and screaming. I carried a girl covered with blood," he said. "Inside the houses, we evacuated dismembered bodies. We saw legs, hands, parts of heads stuck to the wall. Everything was disgusting. this is the worst, bloody scene I have ever scene."
The shelling came after Israeli attacks in Gaza and the West Bank killed at least 15 people following a pullout from the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun at the end of a bloody weeklong sweep.

A Palestinian carries a boy after he was wounded during shelling by Israeli tanks at Beit Hanoun town in the northern Gaza strip November 8, 2006. The death toll from Israeli shelling in the northern Gaza Strip on Wednesday rose to 18, the Palestinian Health Ministry said. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem (GAZA)

A member of the medical services carries a boy killed during shelling by Israeli tanks at Beit Hanoun town in northern Gaza strip November 8, 2006. The death toll from Israeli shelling in the northern Gaza Strip on Wednesday rose to 18, the Palestinian Health Ministry said. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem (GAZA)

A Palestinian man mourns after losing thirteen members of his extended family, including his sons, in an Israeli shelling at Beit Hanoun town in northern Gaza Strip November 8, 2006. (Mohammed Salem/Reuters)

A Palestinian woman carries her wounded son after shelling by Israeli tanks at Beit Hanoun town in the northern Gaza strip November 8, 2006. The death toll from Israeli shelling in the northern Gaza Strip on Wednesday rose to 18, the Palestinian Health Ministry said. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem (GAZA)

A Palestinian man carries a wounded girl after shelling by Israeli tanks at Beit Hanoun town in the northern Gaza strip November 8, 2006. The death toll from Israeli shelling in the northern Gaza Strip on Wednesday rose to 18, the Palestinian Health Ministry said. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem (GAZA)

A member of the medical services carries a woman killed after shelling by Israeli tanks at Beit Hanoun town in the northern Gaza strip November 8, 2006. The death toll from Israeli shelling in the northern Gaza Strip on Wednesday rose to 18, the Palestinian Health Ministry said. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem (GAZA)
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Meanwhile in Palestine
Israel occupation force kill another eight Palestinians: Withdraw from Gaza town: Israeli troops have left roads were gouged out. Homes, two mosques and a school were destroyed. The historic old town was pockmarked with bullet holes and shell craters, electricity pylons ripped from the ground and sewage spewing in the streets.
Ten Palestinians killed in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday: Palestinian medical sources in the Gaza Strip reported that three Palestinians were killed on Tuesday evening, and one on resident died of earlier wounds. Earlier on Wednesday six Palestinians were killed in several Israeli strikes in the Gaza Strip, at least twenty residents were injured.
Resident injured by settler fire in Hebron: Palestinian medical sources in Hebron, in the southern part of the West Bank, reported that one resident was shot and injured after a settler from the Keryat Arba' settlement, east of Hebron, opened fire at him when he was standing near the settlement fence.
Army abducts twenty-five West Bank Residents: The Israeli army invaded the northern West Bank city of Nablus and the southern West Bank city of Bethlehem Tuesday at dawn, fired rounds of live ammunition and abducted twenty-two residents in the two areas.
Visa regime splits Palestinian families: A thousand West Bank Palestinians holding foreign passports have been expelled from their homes and thousands more face a similar fate after Israel tightened its visa regime, according to Palestinian campaigners.
Attorney General receives 40 torture complaints in past year, investigates none: Twenty-four hours before the abduction of Corporal Gilad Shalit, Israel Defense Forces soldiers broke into the home of Mustafa Abu Ma'amar in Rafah. Special forces soldiers arrested him and his brother in their respective homes.
Red Cross Descries Shooting of Medics: The International Red Cross Committee condemned Friday s shooting of two Palestinian Red Crescent Moon medics during an Israeli military operation against the Gaza strip.
Hundreds of Ethiopians protest in Jerusalem / Blood demo becomes anti-racism rally : Hundreds of Israelis of Ethiopian descent demonstrated yesterday in Jerusalem against what they said was blatant discrimination against their community by the state.
Something's rotten in Israel : Latest drop in global corruption index yet another warning sign.
After a six-day barrage, Israel leaves Gaza town to count dead: The Israeli army withdrew from Beit Hanoun yesterday at the end of a six-day search-and-destroy operation, leaving behind a ravaged Gaza town angrily counting the cost.
Study: 57 unarmed Palestinian minors killed by IDF since June: A third of unarmed Palestinians killed during IDF operations in the Gaza Strip since the abduction of Gilad Shalit have been minors, according to a new report prepared by Physicians for Human Rights, to be published Wednesday. Between June 27 and October 28, 247 Palestinians, including 155 civilians (63 percent) were killed by the IDF. Among the civilians killed, 57 were minors.
Beit Hanoun: Israelis pull out leaving trail of death: Hours after the Israeli military pulled out of the town of Beit Hanoun yesterday morning, Talal Nasr was at the cemetery to search for a spot to bury the body of his 13-year-old daughter.
Meanwhile in Iraq
At least 20 killed including UK and U.S. occupation force soldiers: A roadside bomb targeting a U.S. military patrol killed three civilians, including a student, and wounded eight others, including three students
15 bodies found in the Tigris river as fierce battle rages in Ramadi: 15 bodies of unidentified torture victims were found floating in the Tigris River in Suwayrah, 25 miles south of Baghdad, Police Lt Mohammed al Shamari said.
10 Bodies Found In Occupied Baghdad: A total of 10 bodies were found with gunshot wounds during the last 24 hours in different districts of Baghdad, an Interior Ministry source said. Some of the victims showed signs torture.
Fallujah once again beset by violence: In recent months, insurgents have filtered back into the city, despite tight controls that limit access to only six checkpoints. Residents must submit to an extraordinary identification system that includes fingerprinting, retina scans and bar-coded identification cards.
Iraqi Ministry Accuses Employees of Prison Abuse : The Interior Ministry has formally accused 55 employees of committing human rights crimes in connection with the torture and abuse of prisoners at a detention center in eastern Baghdad, a spokesman for the ministry said this morning.
Saddam will be hanged 'by end-January': Saddam’s execution will probably take place in a closed room inside an Iraqi prison, most likely in Baghdad in the presence of Iraqi government officials and private citizens, whose families suffered under the dictator’s reign
Two TV stations closed for showing Iraqis protesting against death sentence for Saddam: Reporters Without Borders today condemned the Iraqi government’s decision yesterday to close down two privately-owned TV stations for “inciting violence and murder” by screening footage of protests against former President Saddam Hussein’s death sentence.
Gwynne Dyer: Why Hussein ultimately wins, and dies a martyr: He is the victim of a state-sponsored lynching, and so, for many people, he will die a martyr.
Move to reinstate Saddam supporters : Iraq's Shia-dominated government has announced a major concession for the Sunni Muslim backers of Saddam Hussein, a day after the former president was sentenced to hang.
New audit hunts Iraq's lost millions: A new audit examining 15 contracts signed in Iraq has found new evidence of massive corruption and mismanagement by the US government.
Hundreds of US Soldiers Call for Iraq Withdrawal in Petition : Hundreds of US soldiers have signed a petition calling for a troop withdrawal from Iraq and the document is to be formally presented to Congress in January, organizers said.
'Failed' American envoy to leave Iraq : Zalmay Khalilzad, the US envoy in Baghdad who tried to conciliate the Sunni people, is to leave his post in the next few months said a senior member of the US administration.
Rats jump ship: U-turns the neocon way: David Frum, Mr Bush's "axis of evil" speechwriter, reportedly believes failure in Iraq is inescapable and the president is to blame. Other well-known neocons also have critical things to say about administration competence.
Sandinista Leader Ortega Poised to Win Nicaragua Presidential Election

DemocracyNow!
With Amy Goodman
"In Nicaragua, Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega has a clear lead in the country's presidential election. With votes tallied from more than 60 percent of polling stations, Ortega has over 38 percent of the vote, nearly eight percentage points ahead of his conservative, Washington-backed rival Eduardo Montealegre. Ortega needs to win at least 35 percent and hold a lead of 5 points to take victory in the first round and avoid a runoff.
He is expected to be confirmed as the winner with a final batch of returns on Tuesday. As results trickled in, thousands of Sandinista party supporters celebrated in the streets of Managua on Monday night.
The race has drawn heavy attention from the Bush administration. The White House has threatened economic sanctions and withdrawal of aid if voters elect Ortega. The former president is trying to regain power for the first time since 1990. In recent weeks a number of current and former U.S. officials have warned about the consequences of an Ortega victory. Oliver North recently traveled to Nicaragua and said a victory by Ortega would be "the worst thing" for the country.
AMY GOODMAN: Our next guest, Roberto Vargas, is a veteran Nicaraguan diplomat. He served as Charge d’Affaires in Washington, D.C., director of the North American Directorate at the Foreign Ministry in Managua, and finally Nicaraguan ambassador to China. He joins us on the phone from San Antonio, Texas. We welcome you to Democracy Now!
AMY GOODMAN: Well, let me ask you about the U.S. involvement in this election. You had Oliver North, who went down and was trying to convince people not to vote for Daniel Ortega. You had Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense. He insisted he wasn't getting involved in the politics of another country, as he said he doesn't get involved in the politics of our own country, but your response?
ROBERTO VARGAS: Well, okay, in terms of the overall entourage, the parade of U.S. diplomats, delegates, officials, etc., that went through Nicaragua in the last several months leading up to the race, we had, of course, Dan Burton of California, we had [inaudible], we’ve had -- again, you’ve pointed out Oliver North, who was the most obvious, and all of these different people -- Carlos Gutierrez. And all of them, in unison, were calling for, you know, people not to vote for Daniel Ortega, that they were going to go back to the ’80s, when, you know, we were faced with Reagan's war. And I think North's presence underlined all of that time, and I think it somehow had a boomerang effect on the people, those who were really not decided how they should vote, you know, I think that kind of pushed them over the edge, in particular last Wednesday and Thursday, Mr. -- what is his name? -- Rohrabacher, Dana Rohrabacher from California insisted on calling--
AMY GOODMAN: The Congressman.
ROBERTO VARGAS: Yeah, Congressman Rohrabacher insisted that Chertoff look into the Homeland Security in how to withhold the remittances, which by different estimates, you know, like provide millions, some people say up to $400 million, to the economy of the Nicaraguan people, right? Now, that's -- I was looking at that the other day and thinking about the larger issue -- right? -- the context of the larger issue right now, immigration and timely remittances, which in some estimates are like $40-something billion going to Latin America from the Latin American citizens, the Latinos living in this country, immigrants, right, so that that is part of that larger issue, where Tancredo from Colorado and recently Inhofe, all of these people are now signing on and calling for the withholding remittances.
And that's, I think, also a boomerang effect, similar to what happened with stopping the Cuban Americans from going to Cuba, right? They weren't really involved in the politics, but their presence, they had license to go at least once a year, and that really threw that whole equation off in Miami, with the younger Cubans particularly. So I think that this is a reminder that all of these people came aboard -- Tancredo, Royce, Rohrabacher -- that they're calling for further boycotts.
Nicaragua currently is one of the poorest countries in the hemisphere, right? Next to Haiti. So to start threatening us with that kind of inhumanity, continued inhumanity, similar to the boycott, the embargo they've had on Cuba, I think that it finally underlined what we're faced with again. When you have a country such as Venezuela that is providing tons and tons of oil, you know, coming into the port quietly, diesel fuel, fertilizer, tons and tons of support and promises of further support, and on the other hand you have the U.S. threatening more warfare, more economic warfare, I think the vote this weekend, with 70% turnout, massive turnout, we can do the analysis on that, right? I mean, it's kind of obvious.
There was a big fear attempt, fear tactics similar to what they do here in this country, but the results are in, and I think Nicaragua is saying something very clearly to the U.S. government, to the U.S. officials who attempted to threaten us. And the vote is clear. We want change, and we think that Daniel Ortega is the one that’s going to lead that change.
AMY GOODMAN: Roberto Vargas, I wanted to ask you about the Bush administration threatening economic sanctions if Ortega wins. In an interview with the Nicaraguan newspaper, La Prensa, the U.S. embassy spokesperson Kristin Stewart said, quote, "If a foreign government has a relationship with terrorist organizations, like the Sandinistas did in the past, U.S. law permits us to apply sanctions. Again, it will be necessary to revise our policies if Ortega wins." That is Kristin Stewart. Your response?
ROBERTO VARGAS: Again, that's part of the fear tactics that were used, very blatant, very, very obvious fear tactics, and again, this is their response. The Nicaraguan people responded completely to the contrary. You know, they demonstrated that we've had enough. We were frightened off in the ’90 elections. People thought that by voting against Ortega that we might have a change, where the -- or respite, where the U.S. would stop their funding of the Contras, where we would probably have some kind of economic respite, where we would have development programs and etc., you know. And it's 16 years proof to the contrary.
We're still poorer than ever, and the rich got richer. You see some interesting development, new hotels, a lot of business coming in, but again, not trickled down to the masses who live on $2 a day, maybe, in Nicaragua. So, yes, to threaten us further with economic sanction like that, I mean, it was the end of it. It was like a death sentence. And Nicaragua doesn't need to depend on that kind of a system, an economic and political system that keeps threatening your very existence, all of the people, just like they've done to Cuba for all these decades, where they don't think of the people of the island. They’re thinking, because of Fidel Castro, as they say, they're going to starve off the people of Cuba. Well, they’ve been trying to do that with Nicaragua, as well, and the people here have responded in another way.
AMY GOODMAN: Roberto Vargas, we're coming up on the 20th anniversary of the Iran-Contra affair, Oliver North central to that during the Reagan-Bush years, illegally selling weapons to Iran, skimming off the profits, and giving them to the Nicaraguan Contras, who were responsible for the deaths of thousands of Nicaraguans, despite the congressional ban, the Boland Amendment that said the Contras could not be supported. The significance of this coming at the same time, and some of the same people today being in office in the United States, who were deeply involved with this, like Elliott Abrams, John Negroponte was involved. Your response? Yes?
ROBERTO VARGAS: Well, I think that it's interesting that this is the Reagan -- a continuation of the Reagan rollback, you know, of the popular resistance and popular movements in Latin America, but I think many of us have said that revolution -- evolution is a process, right? You don't do it overnight by decree. Even elections sometimes will change the course for a while, but if there's a true and deep-seated need for that transformation, that social transformation, that they will continue. And I believe this is an expression of that, where the revolutions and the transformations were held back, but, you know, we saw what's happening now.
We have another opportunity to come back, a different way, a different time, but the change is desperately needed in Nicaragua. We've got to -- just for our basic survival, we've got to change now, and the U.S. has demonstrated throughout the centuries that it's not providing for our survival or for our development for anything, rather than for what they did with the support of Somoza regime for 44 years -- right? -- and the current support that they've got in other areas for dictators in the name of national interest, so that, yes, we want to have peaceful and respectful and commercial relations with the United States, but we cannot accept the kind of hegemony that they exerted on us for decades. "
Neo Culpa: Neoconservatives Say Iraq War Undermined by White House Incompetence

DemocracyNow!
With Amy Goodman
"Well, a new article in Vanity Fair is reporting a number of prominent neoconservatives who backed the invasion of Iraq are now criticizing President Bush's handling of the war. The list includes former Pentagon advisers Richard Perle and Kenneth Adelman; former Presidential speechwriter David Frum; and Michael Rubin, a former senior official in the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans. Richard Perle admitted that huge mistakes were made in Iraq. Perle has criticized Vanity Fair because he claims he was promised his remarks would not be published until after the mid-term election. The article is called "Neo Culpa." It's written by Vanity Fair Contributing Editor David Rose.
AMY GOODMAN: The article is called "Neo Culpa." It’s written by Vanity Fair contributing editor David Rose, who joins us now from Oxford, England, in studio. Welcome to Democracy Now!, David.
AMY GOODMAN: It's good to have you with us. Well, tell us who you talked to and what they said.
DAVID ROSE: Well, you've already given some of the list: Richard Perle; Kenneth Adelman; David Frum; Michael Rubin; also Frank Gaffney, director of the Center for Security Policy -- that’s a think tank with very close ties to the high levels of the Pentagon; with Eliot Cohen from the School of Advanced International Studies; really the sort of flower of the neo-con intellectual elite in Washington, D.C.
And what a number of these individuals are now saying is that the war in Iraq has gone so badly, the situation now appears to be so intractable and the likelihood of actually winning this war now so slim, that had they -- if they had their time over, they would not now be arguing in favor of military intervention in Iraq, even if they continue to believe, as indeed Richard Perle says he does, that Saddam Hussein did possess stocks of weapons of mass destruction, or at least the capability to create such stocks, and connections with terrorism. Richard Perle told me that if he had his time over, he would now say that that security threat to the interest of the United States should be dealt with by some other means.
And Kenneth Adelman, who, of course, wrote the famous Washington Post Op-Ed about a year before the war, which said that Iraq would be a cakewalk, goes even further. He says that he has been simply crushed by the incompetence of the administration, and particularly by his old friend Donald Rumsfeld, and that if he had his time over, instead of writing that Iraq would be a cakewalk, he would say that while a policy of trying to change the regime there was correct, the execution has been so incompetent that the idea should be put, as he put it, in a drawer marked “don't do, too difficult,” rather than “let's go.” Well, this clearly does represent a fairly substantial shift in the positions of these individuals.
AMY GOODMAN: Didn’t Kenneth Adelman use the term for the Bush administration of “dysfunctional,” “deadly”?
DAVID ROSE: Yes, indeed. In fact, quite a number of them have used that word “dysfunctional,” not only Kenneth Adelman, but also Richard Perle, Michael Rubin and David Frum. And what they're particularly referring to is the inability of the administration to make decisions. Of course, they advocated a particular set of policies: a swift handover to an Iraqi government. They also wanted a large number, several thousand Iraqis, to be trained to go in with the coalition forces as auxiliaries.
And I do think there is a very respectable case to be made for both those two positions. If there had been thousands of Iraqi troops with the American-British mobile forces, clearly there would have been interpreters for units, a much better chance of getting local intelligence. And had there been a provisional government quickly, then the war might have been seen as something more akin to a liberation, as they wanted, as opposed to an occupation.
But what they’re really getting at here is that when they advocated that position, as did their colleagues in the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, and the CIA and the State Department argued strongly against such positions, the administration just couldn't make up its mind. So, as we were sending many thousands of soldiers into harm's way in Iraq, the administration hadn't decided what it was going to do next. And as they put it, the process of interagency decision-making, the place where these kinds of disputes should be hammered out, that is the National Security Council, at that time, of course, chaired by Condoleezza Rice, it was dysfunctional and disorganized. Indeed, Michael Rubin says it was one of the worst national security councils in American history. This is a staggering indictment.
But, of course, they also go on to say that while the NSC was dysfunctional, ultimately the buck does stop at the President. It is the President's job to make these decisions. And they say something, which is perhaps even more damning. While President Bush had this rhetoric, what he called his “freedom agenda” of imposing democracy, of bringing democracy to Iraq, and appearing in his rhetoric to agree with what these neo-cons were saying, actually he just didn't seem to grasp how you had to put that into effect.
And so, coming from people who took those positions, who didn't just advocate the invasion in 2003, but in many cases, particularly Richard Perle’s, had been arguing in favor of regime change going way back into the Clinton administration, really almost since Desert Storm in 1991, I mean, this is a tremendous indictment of President Bush. And indeed, I put it to Richard Perle in precisely those terms. I said, “This is an extraordinary indictment of the President.” And he just said to me, “Yes, it is.” "
Read the rest of the transcript of this very revealing interview
Renewed violence in Gaza raises serious concerns for children's safety

Sabine Dolan, UNICEF, 7 November 2006
"Renewed violence in Gaza is again raising serious concerns about the welfare of civilians, including children. Now in its sixth day, the armed conflict has claimed the lives of an estimated 50 Palestinians - half of them civilians, and 8 of them children.
"The situation in northern Gaza, and in particular in Beit Hanoun, is very serious and is getting worse," says UNICEF Representative in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Dan Rohrmann. "We have seen an extraordinary number of children being killed just in the last five days. There are tanks everywhere, shelling, house demolitions and there is fighting in the streets. People are getting quite desperate.
"The children are terrified by everything going on, including seeing family members being taken away," adds Mr. Rohrmann.
More than 350 people have been wounded in the new violence in Gaza. Since the beginning of this year, over 100 children have died in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - more than twice the total killed in 2005.
Food, water, medicines run low
The town of Beit Hanoun, with a population of about 30,000, has been sealed off and remains under curfew. The western part of the city is without electricity and water service to some 10,000 people.
Food supplies are running out because markets and shops cannot renew their stocks. At the same time, aid organizations have been prevented access to some of the most deprived areas.
"Health is a major issue, and at the moment people do not have access to primary health care facilities due to the curfew, the lack of health staff and the lack of drugs. People fear leaving their homes to go to health clinics," explains Mr. Rohrmann.
Call for 'unhindered access'
To address this humanitarian crisis, UNICEF has been working closely with partners such as the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Agency, the World Food Programme and the International Committee of the Red Cross/Red Crescent.
The partner agencies are providing food and water, and have helped repair water systems. UNICEF has been distributing family water kits as well as baby hygiene kits, which are especially needed by those who do not have access to safe water and by families with young, vulnerable children.
"The most important thing right now is to stop the violence and to guarantee that the UN and NGOs have got unhindered access to Beit Hanoun in order to deliver the critical assistance that is needed," asserts Mr. Rohrmann."
stories from north of Gaza
"Sunday, 5 November 2006
I am really worried about the situation in the north of Gaza. After a quick assessment of the situation and being personally unable to enter the village, I decided to send the baby milk with the UN. I am pleased to let you know that on the 5th day of the siege, the MECA office in Gaza managed to send 300 packets of baby milk to Beit Hanoun with the United Nations Relief Work Agency (UNRWA) team. They managed to get permission to enter the village with a convoy. It was not easy to coordinate this entry into the village, and took a lot of time. The curfew was lifted for 2 hours, so the convoy had to arrive to the village during that time.
I am sending some more baby milk with the World Food Program (WFP) team tomorrow. And I also coordinated for medications and medical supplies to be provided for patients with chronic diseases via the Union of Health Work Committees (UHWC).
People are starving; they have no water or electricity or telecommunications. Vast areas of fertile productive land have been destroyed. This incursion came on top of the collapsed economic situation for all Palestinians inside Gaza. Al-Awda Hospital’s teams can reach the village outskirts where it is also very dangerous, but medical rescue teams are not allowed inside the village without a very high level of coordination. Nobody is allowed in or out of the village.
MECA office gave a blanket for each of the injured women who were inside the Al-Awda Hospital, who were injured during the peaceful demonstration aimed to break the siege and free the men inside the mosque. I visited the women inside the hospital the same day just straightaway after the demonstration.
A lot of humanitarian relief is needed at the moment and families need practical support."
Gazan doctors pull shrapnel marked “Made in USA” out of Palestinian
Photos by Dr. Mona Elfaraa
Gazan doctor Mona Elfaraa reports from Al Awda hospital, Jabalya on clearly marked American-made shrapnel found in a Palestinian now in critical condition during the current Israeli attacks on northern Gaza. According to Israeli newspapers, the so-called “Operation Autumn Clouds” has left 57 Palestinians dead. From a November 6th interview with the ISM media team:
“I have seen some of the shrapnel that was recovered from the previous day’s injuries, marked clearly with ‘Made in USA’. The shrapnel pieces seem unusual; our surgeons have not come across this before. Unfortunately, we do not have the time and facilities to investigate. Some of the bodies are totally burnt and have missing limbs and one them was covered with hundreds of pieces of small shrapnel.
“No-one is safe. This morning five and six-year old children wounded in a missile attack, were brought to our hospital. They were shaking and crying with fear. Their teacher Najwa Kholeef had been wounded in the head. A sixteen-year old boy and twenty-year old man had been killed.
“Tanks and armored vehicles have been surrounding the Beit Hanoun hospital for the last six days and preventing medical volunteers and victims of Israeli violence from reaching it.
“On Sunday our colleagues, 21 year old ambulance driver Ahmad Madhun and medical volunteer Mustafa Habib were murdered and Dannielle Abu Samra was wounded while trying to tend to the wounded.”
English-speaking media contacts in Gaza:
Dr Mona Elfaraa, Doctor at Al Awda Hospital in Beit Hanoun.
Tel: +972 599 410 741 and +970 82846602
fromgaza.blogspot.com
Dr Abu Ala’a, Professor at Gaza University.
Tel: + 972 599441766
Dr Asad A. Shark, Gaza Strip, + 972 599 322636
Dr Ayoub Othman, + 972 599 412 826
Yousef Alhelou, Journalist based in Beit Hanoun.
Tel: + 972599697254.
Email: ydamadan@hotmail.com
Contact the ISM Media office for full resolution photos:
02 9297 1824 or 059 994 3157
info@palsolidarity.org
Updated with photos November 7th.
VOTE EARLY, VOTE OFTEN
Abbas calls on Hamas to give him custody of Gilad Shalit

"Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas in an interview published Tuesday in the Saudi daily Asharq Al Awsat, requested that Hamas release Gilad Shalit to his custody, so that he can begin negotiations with Israel over his release.
Head of Hamas political bureau Khaled Meshaal on Tuesday stated that Hamas will continue to kidnap Israeli soldiers until all Palestinian prisoners are released."
***
THE NERVE OF THAT USRAELI AGENT, ABBAS!
He wants Hamas, who has sacrificed so much, to just hand over the Israeli prisoner to him. He would then hand him over to Israel, being the obedient agent that he is. No Palestinian prisoners would be released, but Abbas would get a pat on the head from his masters.
I really think it is a waste of time for Hamas to keep dealing with him. I think this is the time, with the Palestinian public anger at fever pitch, to mount a campaign to force him to resign. He has failed his people and cannot be trusted. He is a not very well disguised agent who should be moved out of the way.
After that, Hamas should dissolve the PA since they control the majority in the Legislative Council. It is time for all serious resistance to coalesce and form a credible national liberation movement. What exists now is neither fish nor fowl; it is an abomination and absurdity. Never in the history of occupied and oppressed people has something like this existed.
First liberate the land before you argue about prime ministers, legislature and embassies. The people are fed up and do not have enough to eat, they are bombed and killed daily, and you are having your endless meetings and "consultations" dressed in your suits, in your air-conditioned offices.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Tony Sayegh
Monday, November 06, 2006
Red Cross: IDF hit clearly marked ambulance workers
The international Red Cross on Sunday deplored the killing by the Israel Defense Forces of two "clearly marked" ambulance workers removing a Palestinian body from an earlier Israeli attack in the Gaza Strip.
The paramedics of the Palestine Red Crescent Society were wearing clearly marked fluorescent jackets and the flashing lights of their ambulance were visible from a great distance when they were hit by Israeli fire after dark on Friday evening, said the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
"The International Committee of the Red Cross is appalled by this failure to protect personnel engaged in emergency medical duties," a statement said.
"The individuals concerned and their means of transport were clearly marked with a distinctive emblem conferring the protection of the Geneva Conventions [on the conduct of warfare]," continued the same statement.
'Deeply shocked'
One of the paramedics was killed on the spot when Israeli Defense Force munitions suddenly hit the area, it said.
The other died of his injuries a few hours later.
The ICRC "deplores" the deaths and "is deeply shocked and saddened by this event," the statement said.
It noted that the Palestinian Red Crescent is a member of the international Red Cross movement.
"Under international humanitarian law, its medical personnel and means of transport must be protected and respected in all circumstances," the ICRC said.
The incident occurred during an Israeli offensive against Palestinian rocket squads.

AS IF ANYTHING THEY DECIDE WOULD MAKE A DAMN BIT OF A DIFFERENCE.
YOU WOULD THINK THEY ARE DECIDING ON A GOVERNMENT FOR AN EMPIRE.
WHAT A FARCE AND A DISGRACE!
PULL THE PLUG ON THAT DAMN, USELESS PA.
11/05/06-CFL ALERT: U.S. ARMING PALESTINIAN MILITIAS TO OVERTHROW THE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT

11/05/06-CFL ALERT: U.S. ARMING PALESTINIAN MILITIAS TO OVERTHROW THE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT (click here to send out our prewritten letter).
*The Israeli daily, Haaretz is reporting that the Bush administration has been arming and training Fatah militias under the control of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in order to prepare them for a civil war in the Palestinian territories against the democratically elected government. Please take a moment to write to your representatives and demand that this country stop undermining efforts towards democracy in the Middle East. Tell your representatives that in light of the horrific violence in Iraq that you are outraged that the U.S. would attempt to bring civil war to the Palestinian territories.
*Also, remind your representatives that the draconian measures that they are taking against the Palestinian government is only serving to punish the Palestinian people for doing precisely what the U.S. demanded of them, holding free elections under occupation. The United Nations has issued reports stating that the Palestinian territories are in as dire of a situation as sub-Saharan Africa, withholding aid to the Palestinians in order to punish them for not voting for Fatah officials is immoral and a slap in the face to all people who stand for democracy. Tell your representatives that you are outraged that the U.S. is playing politics with one of the poorest groups of people in the world.
*Instead of arming President Mahmoud Abbas’ security forces the U.S. should be pressuring the Israelis to release detained members of the Palestinian Parliamentarians, two-thirds of which are being held hostage by the Israeli government. These Parliamentarians were kidnapped by the Israelis and they are being held as bargaining chips for the release of a kidnapped Israeli soldier which the Palestinian government had nothing to do with. Ask your elected officials to demand a clear explanation from the White House as to whether this country is serious about supporting democracy in the Middle East, or whether this country is merely playing lip service in order to continue to prop up and support regimes in the Middle East that were not elected by the people. Ask your elected officials to stop the current administration before it succeeds in turning the Palestinian territories into another Iraq.
EMAIL AND OR CALL THE WHITE HOUSE
WHITE HOUSE COMMENTS LINE: 202-456-1111
WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD: 202-456-1414
WHITE HOUSE FAX: 202-456-2461
==============================
Citizens for Fair Legislation
www.cflweb.org
Meanwhile in Palestine
2 killed from Israeli Occupation Forces near Jabalia: Palestinians sources in Gaza reported that two Palestinians in their 30s were killed by IDF fire east of Jabalia
Israeli fighter jets strike children on way to school; 15-year old killed, teacher critically injured. --The U.S. says that Israel has the right to attack children.
Woman blows herself up, slightly injuring Israeli soldier in occupied Gaza: One Israeli soldier is slightly hurt after what officials say was a suicide bombing by a woman.
Israeli official urges Jew-Arab divide: Israel's new deputy prime minister called for a near-total separation between Arabs and Jews in the Holy Land yesterday, sparking a wave of condemnation less than a week after the far-right politician joined the Cabinet.
IDF girds for possibility of war with Syria, Hezbollah in 2007 : Syria and Hezbollah are likely to start a war against Israel next summer, according to General Staff assessments that have been gathered during a series of meetings in recent week.
Meanwhile in Iraq
5 U.S. Occupation Forces Killed in Iraq: Two U.S. Marines and one soldier died on Saturday and Sunday from wounds sustained in combat in the western province of Anbar
Only 8% of Americans Support Iraq Strategy: Many adults in the United States believe their federal administration should alter its tactics in Iraq, according to a poll by the New York Times and CBS News. 61 per cent of respondents believe the U.S. should change its military strategy.
US 'breeding extremism' in Iraq: An Iraqi parliamentary delegation visiting Qatar has accused the US army in Iraq of breeding extremism by carrying out an "irresponsible arrest campaign".
Military services seek $160 billion extra to cover war costs : The military services and defense agencies have requested as much as $160 billion in supplemental spending for the remainder of fiscal 2007 -- a staggering figure that would bring wartime costs this year to $230 billion, defense sources said Friday.
4 Minute Video: Saddam reacts to death penalty.
Bush and Blair have forfeited the moral authority to hang Saddam: George Bush's handling of this issue restores one's respect for Pontius Pilate.
Blair opposed to Saddam death penalty : "We are against the death penalty, whether it's Saddam or anybody else. --How nice of Blair to oppose the death penalty for Saddam! Would have been more thoughtful of him to oppose the death penalty against the 2 million+ Iraqis that have died as a result of the sanctions and these criminal wars against the Iraqi people!
A Brief History: US-Iraq 1980s
The Teicher Affidavit: Iraq-Gate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v. Case
No.:
93-241-CR-HIGHSMITH
CARLOS CARDOEN,
FRANCO SAFTA,
JORGE BURR,
INDUSTRIAS CARDOEN LIMITADA, DECLARATION OF
a/k/a INCAR, HOWARD TEICHER
SWISSCO MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
EDWARD A. JOHNSON
RONALD W. GRIFFIN, and
TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
d/b/a,
TELEDYNE WAH CHANG ALBANY,
Defendents.
_____________________________________________
I. Howard Teicher, hereby state that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the facts presented herein are true, correct and complete. I further state that to the best of my knowledge and belief, nothing stated in this Declaration constitutes classified information.
1. My name is Howard Teicher. From 1977 to 1987, I served in the United States government as a member of the national security bureaucracy. From early 1982 to 1987, I served as a Staff Member to the United States National Security Council.
2. While a Staff Member to the National Security Council, I was responsible for the Middle East and for Political-Military Affairs. During my five year tenure on the National security Council, I had regular contact with both CIA Director William Casey and Deputy Director Robert Gates.
3. In the Spring of 1982, Iraq teetered on the brink of losing its war with Iran. In May and June, 1982, the Iranians discovered a gap in the Iraqi defenses along the Iran-Iraq border between Baghdad to the north and Basra to the south. Iran positioned a massive invasion force directly across from the gap in the Iraqi defenses. An Iranian breakthrough at the spot would have cutoff Baghdad from Basra and would have resulted in Iraq's defeat.
4. United States Intelligence, including satellite imagery, had detected both the gap in the Iraqi defenses and the Iranian massing of troops across from the gap. At the time, the United States was officially neutral in the Iran-Iraq conflict.
5. President Reagan was forced to choose between (a) maintaining strict neutrality and allowing Iran to defeat Iraq, or (b) intervening and providing assistance to Iraq.
6. In June, 1982, President Reagan decided that the United States could not afford to allow Iraq to lose the war to Iran. President Reagan decided that the United States would do whatever was necessary and legal to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran. President Reagan formalized this policy by issuing a National Security Decision Directive ("NSDD") to this effect in June, 1982. I have personal knowledge of this NSDD because I co-authored the NSDD with another NSC Staff Member, Geoff Kemp. The NSDD, including even its indentifying number, is classified.
7. CIA Director Casey personally spearheaded the effort to ensure that Iraq had sufficient military weapons, ammunition and vehicles to avoid losing the Iran-Iraq war. Pursuant to the secred NSDD, the United States actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required. The United States also provided strategic operational advice to the Iraqis to better use their assets in combat. For example, in 1986, President Reagan sent a secret message to Saddam Hussein telling him that Iraq should step up its air war and bombing of Iran. This message was delivered by Vice President Bush who communicated it to Egyptian President Mubarak, who in turn passed the message to Saddam Hussein. Similar strategic operational military advice was passed to Saddam Hussein through various meetings with European and Middle Eastern heads of state. I authored Bush's talking points for the 1986 meeting with Mubarak and personally attended numerous meetings with European and Middle East heads of state where the strategic operational advice was communicated.
8. I personally attended meetings in which CIA Director Casey or CIA Deputy Director Gates noted the need for Iraq to have certain weapons such as cluster bombs and anti-armor penetrators in order to stave off the Iranian attacks. When I joined the NSC staff in early 1982, CIA Director Casey was adamant that cluster bombs were a perfect "force multiplier" that would allow the Iraqis to defend against the "human waves" of Iranian attackers. I recorded those comments in the minutes of National Security Planning Group ("NSPG") meetings in which Casey or Gates participated.
9. The CIA, including both CIA Director Casey and Deputy Director Gates, knew of, approved of, and assisted in the sale of non-U.S. origin military weapons, ammunition and vehicles to Iraq. My notes, memoranda and other documents in my NSC files show or tend to show that the CIA knew of, approved of, and assisted in the sale of non-U.S. origin military weapons, munitions and vehicles to Iraq.
10. The United States was anxious to have other countries supply assistance to Iraq. For example, in 1984, the Israelis concluded that Iran was more dangerous than Iraq to Israel's existence due to the growing Iranian influence and presence in Lebanon. The Israelis approached the United States in a meeting in Jerusalem that I attended with Donald Rumsfeld. Israeli Foreign Minister Yitzhak Shamir asked Rumsfeld if the United States would deliver a secret offer of Israeli assistance to Iraq. The United States agreed. I travelled wtih Rumsfeld to Baghdad and was present at the meeting in which Rumsfeld told Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz about Israel's offer of assistance. Aziz refused even to accept the Israelis' letter to Hussein offering assistance, because Aziz told us that he would be executed on the spot by Hussein if he did so.
11. One of the reasons that the United States refused to license or sell U.S. origin weapons to Iraq was that the supply of non-U.S. origin weapons to Iraq was sufficient to meet Iraq's needs. Under CIA Director Casey and Deputy Director Gates, the CIA made sure that non-U.S. manufacturers manufactured and sold to Iraq the weapons needed by Iraq. In certain instances where a key component in a weapon was not readily available, the highest levels of the United States government decided to make the component available, directly or indirectly, to Iraq. I specifically recall that the provision of anti-armor penetrators to Iraq was a case in point. The United States made a policy decision to supply penetrators to Iraq. My notes, memoranda and other documents in my NSC files will contain references to the Iraqis' need for anti-armor penetrators and the decision to provide penetrators to Iraq.
12. Most of the Iraqi's military hardware was of Soviet origin. Regular United States or NATO ammunition and spare parts could not be used in this Soviet weaponry.
13. The United States and the CIA maintained a program known as the 'Bear Spares" program whereby the United States made sure that spare parts and ammunition for Soviet or Soviet-style weaponry were available to countries which sought to reduce their dependence on the Soviets for defense needs. If the "Bear Spares" were manufactured outside the United States, then the United States could arrange for the provision of these weapons to a third country without direct involvement. Israel, for example, had a very large stockpile of Soviet weaponry and ammunition captured during its various wars. At the suggestion of the United States, the Israelis would transfer the spare parts and weapons to third countries or insurgent movements (such as the Afghan rebels and the Contras). Similarly, Egypt manufactured weapons and spare parts from Soviet designs and porvided these weapons and ammunition to the Iraqis and other countries. Egypt also served as a supplier for the Bear Spares program. The United States approved, assisted and encouraged Egypt's manufacturing capabilities. The United States approved, assisted and encouraged Egypt's sale of weaponry, munitions and vehicles to Iraq.
14. The mere request to a third party to carry out an action did not constitute a "covert action," and, accordingly, required no Presidential Finding or reporting to Congress. The supply of Cardoen cluster bombs, which were fitted for use on Soviet, French and NATO aircraft, was a mere extension fo the United States policy of assisting Iraq through all legal means in order to avoid an Iranian victory.
15. My NSC files are currently held in trhe President Ronald Reagan Presidential Archives in Simi Valley, California. My files will contain my notes and memoranda from meetings I attended with CIA director Casey or CIA Deputy Director Gates which included discussions of Cardoen's manufacture and sale of cluster bombs to Iraq. My NSC files will also contain cable traffic among various United States agencies, embassies and other parties relating to Cardoen and his sale of cluster bombs and other munitions to Iraq and other Middle Eastern states.
16. Under CIA Director Casey and Deputy Director Gates, the CIA authorized, approved and assisted Cardoen in the manufacture and sale of cluster bombs and other munitions to Iraq. My NSC files will contain documents that show or tend to show the CIA's authorization, approval and assistance of Cardoen's manufacture and sale of cluster bombs and other muntions to Iraq.
17. My files will contain notes, memoranda and other documents that will show that the highest levels fo the United States government, including the NSC Staff and the CIA, were well aware of Cardoen's arrest in 1983 in Miami in a sting operation relating to the smuggling of night vision goggles to Cuba and Libya. My files will also show that the highest levels of the government were aware of the arrest and conviction of two of Cardoen's employees and his company Industrias Cardoen.
18. CIA Director William Casey, aware of Cardoen's arrest and the conviction of his employees and his company, intervened in order to make sure that Cardoen was able to supply cluster bombs to Iraq. Specifically, CIA Director Casey directed the Secretaries of the State and Commerce Departments that the necessary licenses required by Cardoen were not to be denied. My files will contain notes, memoranda and other documents showing or tending to show that CIA Director William Casey's intervention was in order to maintain Cardoen's ability to supply cluster bombs and other munitions to Iraq.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my memory and recollection.
Executed on 1/31/95
Howard Teicher (signature appears on original)
(end of document)
Secret Message From James Baker to Tariq Aziz
This October 21, 1989 cable carries the text of a secret message from Secretary of State James Baker to Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz. Baker informs Aziz, whose government 13 months previously had gassed Kurdish villages, that "the United States seeks a broadened and deepened relationship with Iraq." President Bush's policy, writes Baker, "is to work to strengthen the relationship between the United States and Iraq whenever possible."
Image files of this document are also available for viewing:
Page 1 | Page 2 |
SUBJECT: MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY TO TARIQ AZIZ
1. SECRET - ENTIRE TEXT
2. PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE FROM SECRETARY BAKER TO FOREIGN MINISTER AZIZ. THERE WILL BE NO SIGNED ORIGINAL.
3. BEGIN TEXT:
DEAR MR. MINISTER:
I APPRECIATED THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET YOU. I FOUND OUR MEETING EXTREMELY USEFUL. MY HOPE IS THAT IT HAS LAID THE BASIS FOR A FRANK AND DIRECT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN US. IN THAT SPIRIT, I WANT TO RESPOND TO THE CONCERNS YOU RAISED WITH ME
PAGE 03 OF 04 STATE 338562 C12/25 009007 NOD191
AS I SAID IN OUT MEETING, THE UNITED STATES SEEKS A BROADENED AND DEEPENED RELATIONSHIP WITH IRAQ ON THE BASIS OF MUTUAL RESPECT. THAT IS THE POLICY OF THE PRESIDENT.
IN THIS REGARD, THE PRESIDENT HAS ASKED ME TO SAY TO YOU AND THROUGH YOU TO PRESIDENT HUSSEIN, IN THE MOST DIRECT WAY POSSIBLE, THAT THE UNITED STATES IS NOT INVOLVED IN ANY EFFORT TO WEAKEN OR DESTABILIZE IRAQ. HAVING LOOKED INTO THE MATTER, AND DISCUSSED IT WITH THE PRESIDENT, I CAN TELL YOU THIS WITH THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY. SUCH AN ACTION WOULD BE COMPLETELY CONTRARY TO THE PRESIDENT'S POLICY, WHICH IS TO WORK TO STRENGTHEN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND IRAQ WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF YOU ARE IN A POSITION TO PROVIDE MORE DETAILED INFORMATION I HOPE YOU WILL DO SO. I WANT TO BE VERY SURE THAT THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT THIS IN THE MIND OF THE IRAQI LEADERSHIP.
MR. MINISTER, YOU ALSO ASKED ME TO LOOK INTO THE ISSUE OF THE CCC CREDIT GUARANTEES. I AM DOING SO ON AN URGENT BASIS AND WILL GIVE YOU A FINAL RESPONSE AS SOON AS I CAN. AN INVESTIGATION IS UNDER WAY, AND IN ALL CANDOR THERE ARE SOME SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS THAT NEED TO BE EXAMINED FURTHER. I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT OUR ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CCC PROGRAM ARE NOT IN ANY WAY MOTIVATED BY POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS. THE GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ HAS SET A HIGH STANDARD ON ISSUES OF INTEGRITY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND CORRUPTION AND I AM SURE YOU WILL UNDERSTAND THE DETERMINATION OF MY GOVERNMENT TO BE THOROUGH. AT THE SAME TIME, I VERY MUCH HOPE THAT IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEMS WHICH HAVE ARISEN QUICKLY AND TO CONTINUE WITH THIS IMPORTANT PROGRAM, AS YOU REQUESTED.
WILL CONTINUE TO GIVE THIS MATTER MY PERSONAL ATTENTION...[document ends]
Exclusive: Saddam Was key in early CIA plot
| U.S. forces in Baghdad might now be searching high and low for Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, but in the past Saddam was seen by U.S. intelligence services as a bulwark of anti-communism and they used him as their instrument for more than 40 years, according to former U.S. intelligence diplomats and intelligence officials. United Press International has interviewed almost a dozen former U.S. diplomats, British scholars and former U.S. intelligence officials to piece together the following account. The CIA declined to comment on the report. While many have thought that Saddam first became involved with U.S. intelligence agencies at the start of the September 1980 Iran-Iraq war, his first contacts with U.S. officials date back to 1959, when he was part of a CIA-authorized six-man squad tasked with assassinating then Iraqi Prime Minister Gen. Abd al-Karim Qasim. In July 1958, Qasim had overthrown the Iraqi monarchy in what one former U.S. diplomat, who asked not to be identified, described as "a horrible orgy of bloodshed." According to current and former U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Iraq was then regarded as a key buffer and strategic asset in the Cold War with the Soviet Union. For example, in the mid-1950s, Iraq was quick to join the anti-Soviet Baghdad Pact which was to defend the region and whose members included Turkey, Britain, Iran and Pakistan. Little attention was paid to Qasim's bloody and conspiratorial regime until his sudden decision to withdraw from the pact in 1959, an act that "freaked everybody out" according to a former senior U.S. State Department official. Washington watched in marked dismay as Qasim began to buy arms from the Soviet Union and put his own domestic communists into ministry positions of "real power," according to this official. The domestic instability of the country prompted CIA Director Allan Dulles to say publicly that Iraq was "the most dangerous spot in the world." In the mid-1980s, Miles Copeland, a veteran CIA operative, told UPI the CIA had enjoyed "close ties" with Qasim's ruling Baath Party, just as it had close connections with the intelligence service of Egyptian leader Gamel Abd Nassar. In a recent public statement, Roger Morris, a former National Security Council staffer in the 1970s, confirmed this claim, saying that the CIA had chosen the authoritarian and anti-communist Baath Party "as its instrument." According to another former senior State Department official, Saddam, while only in his early 20s, became a part of a U.S. plot to get rid of Qasim. According to this source, Saddam was installed in an apartment in Baghdad on al-Rashid Street directly opposite Qasim's office in Iraq's Ministry of Defense, to observe Qasim's movements. Adel Darwish, Middle East expert and author of "Unholy Babylon," said the move was done "with full knowledge of the CIA," and that Saddam's CIA handler was an Iraqi dentist working for CIA and Egyptian intelligence. U.S. officials separately confirmed Darwish's account. Darwish said that Saddam's paymaster was Capt. Abdel Maquid Farid, the assistant military attaché at the Egyptian Embassy who paid for the apartment from his own personal account. Three former senior U.S. officials have confirmed that this is accurate. The assassination was set for Oct. 7, 1959, but it was completely botched. Accounts differ. One former CIA official said that the 22-year-old Saddam lost his nerve and began firing too soon, killing Qasim's driver and only wounding Qasim in the shoulder and arm. Darwish told UPI that one of the assassins had bullets that did not fit his gun and that another had a hand grenade that got stuck in the lining of his coat. "It bordered on farce," a former senior U.S. intelligence official said. But Qasim, hiding on the floor of his car, escaped death, and Saddam, whose calf had been grazed by a fellow would-be assassin, escaped to Tikrit, thanks to CIA and Egyptian intelligence agents, several U.S. government officials said. Saddam then crossed into Syria and was transferred by Egyptian intelligence agents to Beirut, according to Darwish and former senior CIA officials. While Saddam was in Beirut, the CIA paid for Saddam's apartment and put him through a brief training course, former CIA officials said. The agency then helped him get to Cairo, they said. One former U.S. government official, who knew Saddam at the time, said that even then Saddam "was known as having no class. He was a thug -- a cutthroat." In Cairo, Saddam was installed in an apartment in the upper class neighborhood of Dukki and spent his time playing dominos in the Indiana Café, watched over by CIA and Egyptian intelligence operatives, according to Darwish and former U.S. intelligence officials. One former senior U.S. government official said: "In Cairo, I often went to Groppie Café at Emad Eldine Pasha Street, which was very posh, very upper class. Saddam would not have fit in there. The Indiana was your basic dive." But during this time Saddam was making frequent visits to the American Embassy where CIA specialists such as Miles Copeland and CIA station chief Jim Eichelberger were in residence and knew Saddam, former U.S. intelligence officials said. Saddam's U.S. handlers even pushed Saddam to get his Egyptian handlers to raise his monthly allowance, a gesture not appreciated by Egyptian officials since they knew of Saddam's American connection, according to Darwish. His assertion was confirmed by former U.S. diplomat in Egypt at the time. In February 1963 Qasim was killed in a Baath Party coup. Morris claimed recently that the CIA was behind the coup, which was sanctioned by President John F. Kennedy, but a former very senior CIA official strongly denied this. "We were absolutely stunned. We had guys running around asking what the hell had happened," this official said. But the agency quickly moved into action. Noting that the Baath Party was hunting down Iraq's communist, the CIA provided the submachine gun-toting Iraqi National Guardsmen with lists of suspected communists who were then jailed, interrogated, and summarily gunned down, according to former U.S. intelligence officials with intimate knowledge of the executions. Many suspected communists were killed outright, these sources said. Darwish told UPI that the mass killings, presided over by Saddam, took place at Qasr al-Nehayat, literally, the Palace of the End. A former senior U.S. State Department official told UPI: "We were frankly glad to be rid of them. You ask that they get a fair trial? You have to get kidding. This was serious business." A former senior CIA official said: "It was a bit like the mysterious killings of Iran's communists just after Ayatollah Khomeini came to power in 1979. All 4,000 of his communists suddenly got killed." British scholar Con Coughlin, author of "Saddam: King of Terror," quotes Jim Critchfield, then a senior Middle East agency official, as saying the killing of Qasim and the communists was regarded "as a great victory." A former long-time covert U.S. intelligence operative and friend of Critchfield said: "Jim was an old Middle East hand. He wasn't sorry to see the communists go at all. Hey, we were playing for keeps." Saddam, in the meantime, became head of al-Jihaz a-Khas, the secret intelligence apparatus of the Baath Party. The CIA/Defense Intelligence Agency relation with Saddam intensified after the start of the Iran-Iraq war in September of 1980. During the war, the CIA regularly sent a team to Saddam to deliver battlefield intelligence obtained from Saudi AWACS surveillance aircraft to aid the effectiveness of Iraq's armed forces, according to a former DIA official, part of a U.S. interagency intelligence group. This former official said that he personally had signed off on a document that shared U.S. satellite intelligence with both Iraq and Iran in an attempt to produce a military stalemate. "When I signed it, I thought I was losing my mind," the former official told UPI. A former CIA official said that Saddam had assigned a top team of three senior officers from the Estikhbarat, Iraq's military intelligence, to meet with the Americans. According to Darwish, the CIA and DIA provided military assistance to Saddam's ferocious February 1988 assault on Iranian positions in the al-Fao peninsula by blinding Iranian radars for three days. The Saddam-U.S. intelligence alliance of convenience came to an end at 2 a.m. Aug. 2, 1990, when 100,000 Iraqi troops, backed by 300 tanks, invaded its neighbor, Kuwait. America's one-time ally had become its bitterest enemy. |
| UPI: Richard Sale |
The Hidden Horrors Of Israel's Attack On Palestinian Civilians In Gaza

Images that the Israeli and U.S. government's don't want you to see.
WARNING: VERY GRAPHIC.
Click on title to view photos.
Bush and Israel, Midwives to Radical Islam

A GOOD ARTICLE
By Chris Hedges
Editor’s note: In this column, the former New York Times Mideast bureau chief argues that America’s failure in Iraq and Israel’s humiliation in Lebanon have emboldened and empowered those in the Arab world who seek to topple U.S.-backed regimes in the Middle East and cripple the Jewish state.
"The Israeli debacle in Lebanon, along with the failed occupation in Iraq, has given many Arabs, after decades of humiliation, hope that armed guerrilla resistance by Islamic radicals will topple U.S.-backed regimes in the Middle East and cripple the Jewish state. The callous comment by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the Israeli bombing of Lebanon signaled “the birth pangs” of a new Middle East has turned out to be true, although not in the way the secretary intended.
The dogged resistance by bands of irregular fighters, disciplined in battle and indoctrinated with radical Islam, has seen Washington’s most vociferous enemies, including Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, lionized throughout the region. This resistance has eroded the power of pro-Western regimes in Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. As we prepare for Round Two, with Israel plotting to again bomb and invade Lebanon, it is clear that these wars of attrition are about to become cyclical, with Israel and Washington clinging blindly to the illusion that increased force will solve their dilemmas.
Israel and Washington see Lebanon and Iraq as temporary setbacks. They believe that these setbacks can be rectified with modified tactics, greater force and more sophisticated counterinsurgency campaigns. But the Arab world views Lebanon and Iraq differently. It sees the battles there as finally challenging the long subjugation at the hands of the Zionist state and its American backer. A second attempt to neutralize Hezbollah will mark the beginning of a prolonged conflict between radical Islamists and the Jewish state. A strike by Washington on Iran will unleash waves of rage and revulsion throughout the Arab nations. These are battles Israel and America cannot win.
The U.S. failure in Iraq and Hezbollah’s stubborn resistance illustrate that modern armies such as Israel’s, equipped with the world’s fourth largest air force, are not invincible. These failures have exposed the impotence of the U.S.-backed regimes in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan and Egypt, which have nothing to show for their collaboration with Washington other than increasing repression, isolation and corruption.
Israel and Washington appear not to have grasped this seismic change. Israeli leaders, busy studying the failures of the first incursion, appear as intoxicated with their military power as when they began bombing Lebanon. Washington mouths its usual empty promises about a negotiated solution to the Palestinian and Israeli conflict and its tired clichs about building democracy in Iraq and the Middle East. The quiet endorsement of the Israeli strangulation of the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority, along with the carnage unleashed by U.S. forces in Iraq, makes Washington appear more and more remote, even ridiculous."
Sandinista leader Ortega appears near victory

Poll: Ex-guerrilla topping 35 percent needed to avoid Nicaragua runoff
"MANAGUA, Nicaragua - Daniel Ortega appeared headed back to the presidency 16 years after a U.S.-backed rebellion helped oust the former Marxist revolutionary, as partial results and the country’s top electoral watchdog indicated he had easily defeated four opponents.
The Sandinista leader’s victory in Sunday’s election, if confirmed by final results, would expand the club of leftist Latin American rulers led by Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, who has tried to help his Nicaraguan ally by shipping cheap oil to the energy-starved nation.
The race has generated intense international interest, including a visit by Oliver North, the former White House aide at the heart of the Iran-Contra controversy.
A statistical survey of official results, carried out by the Nicaraguan Civic Group for Ethics and Transparency, gave Ortega 38.5 percent to 29.5 percent for the wealthy banker Eduardo Montealegre. "
***
EAT YOUR HEART OUT CONDOLEEZZA!
Autumn clouds pile up over Beit Hanoun

Palestinian friends and relatives attend the funeral of paramedic Ahmed al-Madhoun, 43, who was killed during clashes with Israeli forces in Beit Hanoun in Gaza, 4 November 2006. (MaanImages/Wesam Saleh)
Yousef Alhelou writing from Beit Hanoun, Live from Palestine, 6 November 2006
"An Israeli Apache helicopter swoops toward northern Gaza and drops missiles on Beit Hanoun, leaving a plume of dust and destruction in its wake...
At least 52 Gazans have been killed since the start of Israel's 'Operation Autumn Clouds' in the Gaza Strip. More than 260 Palestinians have also been injured in this continued offensive, most of them civilians, including approximately 43 women, 30 children, 1 paramedic, and 1 journalist.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert refused Sunday to say when Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip will end, telling his Cabinet the operation will continue until Palestinian rocket attacks significantly decrease.
Local radio stations in the Gaza Strip have broadcast throughout the day and night for the fifth successive day in order to keep listeners informed of any breaking news, and played patriotic songs saluting the men of the resistance and the military wings of resistance organizations. The resistance groups called their battle against the Israeli army "the battle of the faithful, free fighters."
While I was driving to Kamal Udwan hospital in Beit Lahiya and listening to a local radio station to get the news update, suddenly the Israeli army succeeded in occupying the airwaves for a few minutes. They played a recorded message warning the residents in the north to stay inside their houses and to keep away from militants and not offer them any assistance or protection.
Zeyad Abdul Dayem, an ambulance driver, said: "We had to wait today for 15 hours until the Israeli army allowed us to evacuate the body of a dead man who was killed by Israeli snipers who were positioned on the rooftops of high buildings belonging to Palestinian residents in Beit Hanoun."
Mohamed Al-Kafarnah, a 43-year old father of four children in Beit Hanoun, said "I was not in Beit Hanoun when the Israeli army entered the town."
I asked how he was keeping in touch with his family. He responded, "I was lucky to talk to them for the last four days by mobile, but an hour ago they said their battery is running out and they don't have electricity in the whole town, so they won't be able to charge the mobile. Moreover, they cannot use telephone land lines because the Israeli army destroyed the telephone central switches and wire networks in the area."
"I'm so worried about them. They don't have drinking water, food, milk and medicine for the children who are suffering and scared."
He added: "People are in a very critical situation. Some of them throw food to each other from roof to roof and through the windows. There are hundreds of Israeli snipers occupying peoples' houses and they shoot at any moving object; they have even killed animals."
When I asked him why he was in the hospital, he replied, "The reason why I'm in the hospital is because the body of my dead cousin is still in the morgue. We are waiting for the Israeli army to lift the siege and curfew, and to end their incursion in the town so that we will be able to bury him in the cemetery of Beit Hanoun."
Munir Abu Oudah, 38, said "this incursion and offensive is different from the previous one. I think they are going to commit massacres like they did in Jenin in the West Bank. This time, they destroy houses and carry out mass arrests of men of Beit Hanoun and take them to unknown destinations. They are even surrounding Beit Hanoun hospital, and the unmanned drones [called "Zannanah" because they make a buzzing sound] don't stop hovering in the skies above our heads all the time."
"The Israelis do not allow us to make the call for prayer because they shoot at anyone who moves, including people who are trying to go to the mosque," says Zaki Kafarna, who won't allow his seven children to leave the house since his neighbor


































