I want to know why those complicit in Almalki’s ordeal are not tried in courtBy Robert FiskCOMMENT: You need to read this to have a better understanding of the despicable Syrian regime and its relations with the Imperial West.
(left)
Abdullah Almalki".....Snooped on by the Canadian secret service and then
tortured in Syria while the Canadian authorities did nothing for him – save supplying his perverted torturers with questions – he had much to think about. A carbon copy of Binyam Mohamed, the British resident who
had his penis cut up while the Brits sent questions to his perverted Moroccan torturers.
In Abdullah Almalki's case, he wasn't renditioned. He simply
flew into Damascus to see his Syrian family, got banged up in the city's secret police headquarters and was
then beaten into submission, not much different from an even more famous case – that of
Maher Arar, who was a Canadian citizen and got
renditioned to Damascus by the Americans while the US authorities sent questions to his perverted Syrian torturers......
For months, he was held in a
secret service hellhole in Damascus and whipped with steel while the
Syrians acted upon a Canadian letter to them (dated 4 October 2001) which stated that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were suggesting that Mr Almalki was linked through association with al-Qa'ida and engaged in activities that posed an "imminent threat" to the public safety and security of Canada......
No, I don't think Canada as a nation is to blame for all this. But the West is. For it is our public servants in government and
our secret service thugs who have been in league with all these perverted men around the world. Indeed, even when Almalki was freed from his Syrian prison, Canadian embassy officials in Damascus would not allow him to stay in their building and ordered him out when the embassy closed at 4pm. One of them reportedly later told Almalki that
Canada regularly gave passports to the families of leading Syrian officials. Can this be true?.....
I do know that the Syrians quite recently complained mightily to the Americans as well as the Canadians. First, the
West sent its prisoners to be tortured in Damascus – and then complained that Syria abused human rights! Quite so......
But I want to know why those complicit in Almalki's torture – the letter writers, the composers of questions – cannot be tried in court. They are, at the least, accomplices to human rights abuses. So are the Brits who went to question tortured men in Guantanamo. Even more so are the American perverts who indulged in their own torture in Afghanistan and Iraq – and yes, I have noted that
our dear President Obama is allowing the illegal detention of prisoners at Bagram in Afghanistan to continue. But what else would you expect from a man whose secretary of state,
Lady Hillary, far from going to the Palestinians whose homes were going to be destroyed by the Israelis in Jerusalem and denouncing this outrage, said merely that the
home demolitions were "unhelpful".....
But there are an awful lot of men in Western governments who should be in the dock.
They won't be, of course. And oh yes – just in case you missed it – Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has just admitted that Canadian troops in Afghanistan are not going to win a military victory there.
Just think. All that torture – for nothing."
