Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Israel, Iran, US lead 'least-liked' countries


Call it the new "axis of evil", or at least of unpopularity. A new poll sponsored by the BBC lumps Iran, Israel and the US together as the world's least-liked nations. A little more than half of the respondents said they had mainly negative views of the three countries.

By Jim Lobe
Asia Times

"WASHINGTON - A majority of people from around the world hold predominantly negative views of Israel, Iran, and the United States, according to a survey of more than 28,000 respondents in 27 countries.

The survey, which was sponsored by the British Broadcasting Corp's World Service and designed by Globescan and the Washington-based Program for International Policy Attitudes (PIPA), found that 56% and 54% of all respondents said they had mainly negative views of Israel and Iran, respectively.

Fifty-one percent and 48% said the same about the United States and North Korea, respectively.

At the other end of the spectrum, 54% said they felt "mainly positive" about both Canada and Japan, while the European Union and France, with 53% and 50% "positive" ratings, were the next highest among the 12 countries or regions rated in the survey.

"It appears that people around the world tend to look negatively on countries whose profile is marked by the use or pursuit of military power," said PIPA director Steven Kull.

"This includes Israel and the US, which have recently used military force, and North Korea and Iran, who are perceived as trying to develop nuclear weapons," he said, adding, "Countries that relate to the world primarily through soft power, like Japan, France, and the EU in general, tend to be viewed more positively."......"

Palestinian "Unity Government"
By Naser Jafari

Libby's Conviction

Liar in the White House: Cheney aide found guilty in CIA leak case


Saga of Washington's discredited WMD claims leads to the conviction for perjury of Dick Cheney's key aide

By Rupert Cornwell in Washington

"In a massive new blow to the credibility of the White House, Vice-President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff Lewis Libby has been convicted of obstruction of justice, perjury and lying to the FBI, during the investigation into the leaking of the identity of a CIA agent.

After a seven-week trial, the jury found Libby guilty yesterday on four of the five counts against him. Ever calm in court, Libby merely blinked as the verdict was read out. Defence lawyers immediately said they would seek a fresh trial, and if that failed, lodge an appeal. In theory Libby faces up to 25 years in jail, though federal sentencing guidelines mean he is likely to receive a far shorter term.......

But there is no concealing the extent of the damage. Libby is not only the most senior Bush administration official to face - and now be convicted of - criminal charges. As chief of staff to arguably the most powerful vice-president in US history, he was one of the two or three most important policy-makers at the White House after the President and Vice-President.

The trial, in which neither Libby nor his former boss testified, threw no new light on the handling of the WMD intelligence used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq. But it revealed the obsessive sensitivity of the Vice-President's office to any attack on its pre-war use of intelligence, and its determination to discredit critics.

At one point the prosecution produced a specimen of the offending article, annotated by Mr Cheney himself, asking who Mr Wilson was, and whether he had been sent on his 2002 fact-finding mission to Africa as a "junket" organised by his wife. The guilty verdict against Libby is thus bound to tarnish further the reputation of both Mr Bush and Mr Cheney, whose approval ratings are even lower than those of the President......"

Sunnis will not be persuaded that Iran is their real enemy


Washington's attempt to pave the way for another invasion by fomenting anti-Shia sectarianism in the Middle East will fail

Azzam Tamimi
Wednesday March 7, 2007
The Guardian

"Despite the horrific failure of its adventures in Afghanistan, Iraq and Lebanon, the US is now said to be preparing to attack Iran. Meanwhile, all disputes in the Middle East have suddenly turned into sectarian conflicts and Iran is portrayed as the main culprit. Nothing now seems comprehensible to the western media and political establishments unless seen through the prism of Iranian ambitions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and even more distant conflicts such as Somalia and Darfur. Opponents of Iran and of whomever Iran is thought to support in the region no longer want us to see US interventions as the main issue - let alone the primary cause of the mayhem enveloping the entire Middle East.......

Now the Americans and their Arab allies in the region seem convinced that their Iranian adversary is the real winner from the occupation of Iraq. The threat to US interests has been compounded by the refusal of the Iranians to abandon their nuclear programme. The US-Shia alliance in Iraq has backfired on America. Now, as the fourth anniversary of the invasion approaches, a US-Sunni alliance seems to be in the making to pave the way for an attack against Iran. It is widely believed in the region that the meeting in Jordan on 20 February between Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, and the intelligence chiefs of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates was aimed at preparing the ground. The idea appears to be for the Sunni world, which until recently would have been opposed to any attack on Iran, to see the merits of a US strike. The role of Washington's friends in the region would be to portray Iran as the real threat to both Arabs and Sunnis. The best climate for achieving such an objective is sectarianism not only inside Iraq but across the region.

But the new US-Sunni alliance is likely to backfire, as the US-Shia alliance did. If one of the latter's repercussions was a Sunni backlash, wait and see what an Iranian-backed Shia explosion of anger will do to our world. And the anger will not be confined to Shias. The US-Sunni alliance is in fact a coalition with the corrupt regimes of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan - which falsely claim to represent Sunni Islam and are loathed by their populations - along with their backers in the west. If Iran is attacked, it is highly unlikely that the Sunnis will be indifferent; just as they stood by Hizbullah last summer, they will stand by Iran. The attempt to create a US-Sunni alliance has already failed to convince most Sunnis that Iran - rather than the US - is the real enemy."

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Hamas' Capitulation, One Step at a Time.....


Hamas vows full cease-fire if Israel helps end aid boycott of PA government

"If Israel agrees to persuade the international community not to boycott the new Palestinian unity government, the Palestinians "will offer a promise from Hamas and Fatah of a total cease-fire with Israel, including a complete halt to Qassam [rocket] fire and suicide bombings," a senior Hamas official told Haaretz on Tuesday.

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas plans to deliver this offer at his upcoming meeting with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Palestinian sources said. The meeting is tentatively scheduled for Sunday, thought according to the Palestinians, the date has not yet been finalized.

However, the Hamas official warned, if Israel presses for a continuation of the international boycott and refuses to work with the unity government, the existing partial cease-fire will be in danger......."

***

At this rate Hamas will be denouncing Palestinian resistance as "terrorism" in no time, just like "brother" Abu Mazen, all in the name of "national unity." I can see the day when Hamas clashes with Islamic Jihad; just give Ahmad Yousef some time.

Celebrate, Now!

Don't Push Pakistan Too Far


By Eric Margolis

"......Many Pakistanis oppose the US occupation of Afghanistan, support their old anti-communist ally, Taliban, and think better of Osama bin Laden than George Bush. Many senior and junior officers in Pakistan’s military and powerful intelligence service, ISI, feel similarly and are bitter at Musharraf for abandoning Taliban and resistance groups fighting to oust Indian rule in divided Kashmir.

Musharraf is thus caught between Washington’s growing demands and his own people, who increasingly accuse him of being an American tool. Washington simply does not understand it has pushed the isolated, unpopular Musharraf too far already. If he is blown up or overthrown, Pakistan and its 40–60 nuclear weapons, could turn into an even bigger and more dangerous hotbed of anti-western activity. The next army corps commander who takes over may not be as amenable to Washington’s demands as Pervez Musharraf.

Meanwhile, Washington is increasingly blaming its Afghanistan fiasco on whipping boy Pakistan, just as the Vietnam defeat was blamed on infiltration from Cambodia and Laos. Recently, a remarkably ill-informed Canadian defense minister foolishly proposed sending Canadian troops into Pakistan’s tribal agencies to “fight terrorists.”

Picking a fight with old, loyal ally Pakistan is both morally wrong and fraught with untold dangers. The US has forgotten how it forced another compliant military ruler, Egypt’s Anwar Sadat, into policies his people hated. He was assassinated, to national joy.

Negotiating a deal with Taliban and other Afghan resistance forces is the only way out of the current morass, not undermining Pakistan or expanding a war that is already lost."

We have not been liberated


Women's basic rights are being rapidly eroded in Iraq and occupation forces seem to have forgotten their promises of empowerment.

Haifa Zangana
The Guardian

"The regime in Baghdad's Green Zone is busy organising a celebration of a different kind for this year's International Women's Day on 8 March. Among its highlights will be the execution of four Iraqi women. This follows on from its decision to honour four of its Iraqi officers accused of raping a young woman Zainab Abbas Hussain al-Shummary. The office of prime minister had forged an American medical report. Long gone are the colourful parades of Iraqi women commemorating their achievements. Now we only have parades of death, where the "liberated" and "empowered" Iraqi women and girls, covered head to toe with hijabs and abayas, will queue at police stations, prisons, detention camps, hospital's "fridges" and crowded morgues looking for the disappeared, kidnapped or their assassinated loved ones......

Let us start by talking death sentence. Bearing in mind that executions of women were formally prohibited under Iraqi law from 1965 on the grounds that women are life-givers and life-nurturers.

The four women sentenced to death and in imminent danger of execution are Samar Sa'ad 'Abdullah, Wassan Talib, Zeynab Fadhil, and Liqa' Qamar. Ages 25-31. They were tried individually for murder, kidnapping, and the murder of several members of Iraqi security forces in Baghdad. All denied the accusations and Amnesty International is questioning the circumstances which led to the sentences by the central criminal court of Iraq (CCCI) between 2005-2006. Two of the women have young children with them: Zeynab Fadhil has her three-year-old daughter, Liqa' Qamar her one-year-old daughter, who was born in prison. The death penalty was reinstated in August 2004 by the "sovereign" interim government.......

The rapes of Abeer, Zainab and Wajda are just few of many other cases documented by Iraqi human rights organisations and UNAMI. According to Mohamed Iraqi MP Al Dainey in a recent interview on Al Sharqiya TV, 1053 documented cases of rape by the occupation forces, militias and Police took place in Iraq since 2003......"

Promising Democracy, Imposing Theocracy: Gender-Based Violence and the US War on Iraq


Democracy Now!
With Amy Goodman


"“Promising Democracy, Imposing Theocracy: Gender-Based Violence and the US War on Iraq." That's the title of the ground breaking report being released today at the UN.

The announcement follows on the heels of two high-profile cases of Sunni women allegedly raped by Shiite security forces last month.

The report documents the systematic use of violence committed by Islamist militias against Iraqi women. Methods of violence include widespread honor killings, torture, assassination and rape. The report reveals the most extensive violence against women has been committed by Shiite militias armed, trained, and financed by the United States.

The author of the report is Yifat Susskind who is here in the studio with me. Also joining us is Houzan Mahmoud. She is the International Representative of the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq. Welcome to Democracy Now!.....

YIFAT SUSSKIND: Well, I mean, you summed it up well, Amy. There’s been, since the US invasion, a virtual epidemic of all forms of gender-based violence in Iraq, a sharp rise in violence against women in the public sphere, women being harassed, beaten, assassinated, raped. Much of it is directed by Islamist militias on both sides of the sectarian divide.

But what is really remarkable is that much of the violence -- in fact, the most widespread violence -- in many instances is being carried out by these militias who are essentially the armed wings of the political parties that the US has boosted to power in Iraq. So these are sort of shock troops of political parties that are closely allied with the United States. At a certain point, the US was providing military training and arms and money to these militias, in the hopes that they would sort of step up where the official Iraqi army had not and were to combat the anti-US insurgency.

You know, there's a lot of pieces that, you know, we've seen in the press sort of in bits and pieces. But what we haven't seen is kind of the story of the Iraq war told from the perspective of Iraqi women, and that's what we aim to do in the report.....

AMY GOODMAN: Houzan, how difficult, dangerous is it to talk about this issue? Right now, you’ve just had a fatwa issued against you?

HOUZAN MAHMOUD: Yes, that’s true. Just last week.

AMY GOODMAN: So who has issued this fatwa, and how do you know it was?

HOUZAN MAHMOUD: Yeah, I received an email, and the email said that “You will be killed by middle of March, because you have been campaigning against Islam.” And it says Ansar al-Islam, which is a notoriously Islamist jihadist group based in Kurdistan. And they've been infamous, basically, for killing and beheading people in the villages in Kurdistan.

AMY GOODMAN: You're originally from Kurdistan in northern Iraq.

HOUZAN MAHMOUD: Yes, I am.
........"

Click Here to Watch, Listen or Read Transcript

The Golden Noose Award for 2007 Goes to Arab Officialdom for Utter Failure

Meet Eliot Cohen, Condi's New Deputy


"As Extremist a Neocon and Warmonger as It Gets"

By GARY LEUPP
CounterPunch

""Afghanistan constitutes just one front in World War IV, and the battles there just one campaign. . . . First, if one front in this war is the contest for free and moderate governance in the Muslim world, the U.S. should throw its weight behind pro-Western and anticlerical forces there. The immediate choice lies before the U.S. government in regard to Iran. We can either make tactical accommodations with the regime there in return for modest (or illusory) sharing of intelligence, reduced support for some terrorist groups and the like, or do everything in our power to support a civil society that loathes the mullahs and yearns to overturn their rule. It will be wise, moral and unpopular (among some of our allies) to choose the latter course. The overthrow of the first theocratic revolutionary Muslim state and its replacement by a moderate or secular government, however, would be no less important a victory in this war than the annihilation of bin Laden"

The guy who wrote that, in a Wall Street Journal op-ed on November 20, 2001, was Eliot Cohen, a professor at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University. As the Director of the Strategic Studies department at SAIS, he has been called "the most influential neoconservative in academe.".......

So here's a man to watch, as Bush/Cheney policy towards Iran evolves. Others are Elliott Abrams (Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy), and Abram Shulsky (head of the Pentagon's "Iran Directorate"), both students of Leo Strauss and comfortable proponants of using "noble lies" to manipulate public opinion to generate support for more imperialist wars. They may be desperate men at this point, when they read, for example, the recent Washington Post/ABC poll that shows 63% of Americans do not trust the Bush administration "to honestly and accurately report intelligence about possible threats from other countries."

They may well fear that if they can't "take the current when it serves"---by their use of noble lies, their ongoing paid, corrupt, discrete if obvious presence in the mainstream press--they will lose their ventures. Their usefully ignorant, manipulable cruel cowboy has less than two years left in the saddle, and great deeds cry out to be done!

The neocon agenda is plain enough. If only the dissident generals can be silenced! If only the assailants of the Israel Lobby can be quieted by bullying accusations of anti-Semitism! If only the war-weary American people can be made to understand that it's "moral and wise" to attack Iran! Because it's planning genocide! Because it's planning what Hitler couldn't do---wipe out the Jews! Then we can defeat the Evil which is Iran! And Syria! And the Shiite population of southern Lebanon!......"

Israel, Iran top 'negative list'



A majority of people believe that Israel and Iran have a mainly negative influence in the world, a poll for the BBC World Service suggests.

It shows that the two countries are closely followed by the United States and North Korea.

The poll asked 28,000 people in 27 countries to rate a dozen countries plus the EU in terms of whether they have a positive or negative influence.

Canada, Japan and the EU are viewed most positively in the survey......"

US ally Musharraf in a tangle over Iran


By M K Bhadrakumar
Asia Times

"The intense pressure from Washington on President General Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan to be cooperative in the "war on terror" is yielding dramatic results, although perhaps not of the kind initially anticipated.

The Pakistan-Iran relationship, which has never been easy, has nosedived to a low point in recent weeks, even as Musharraf remains under pressure to do more in clamping down on al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan's tribal areas.

The moot point is to what extent Musharraf is willingly cooperating with US regional policy against Iran. He is skating on thin ice. He may endear himself to Washington as a brave leader in the Muslim world, but Pakistani public opinion is averse to serving the US agenda over Iran. This contradiction is fraught with dangers. It can only further accentuate Musharraf's isolation within Pakistan and add to the country's overall political uncertainties.

Washington could be miscalculating that only the Shi'ites in Sunni-dominated Pakistan will feel alienated by Musharraf's unfriendly attitude toward Tehran. The fact is, in emotive terms, the average Pakistani citizen is bound to view US hostility toward Iran as yet another instance of Washington's "crusade" against the Islamic world.....

All this says that, apart from sundry other minority groups of minuscule size, such as the Turkmens, Talysh, Qashqai, Lurs, Gilaki or Mazandarani, with hardly any surplus of militant ethnic nationalism available for inciting, the Balochs (who form roughly 2% of the population) offer themselves as the obvious choice for Washington to train its terrorism weapon against the Iranian regime......

However, there is a sideshow to these happenings that is no less profound. US intelligence operatives must be laughing all the way to Washington that they could manage with such ease what their suave diplomats (and wily Congress members) have had a hard time achieving in recent years - arresting Islamabad and New Delhi from finalizing the $7 billion Iran-Pakistan-India gas-pipeline project. In geopolitical terms, the project holds the definite potential to forge a unified Asian energy market, with deep implications for US energy security......"

Current Al-Jazeera (Arabic) Online Poll


This poll exposes the lack of credibility of the Mubarak government in Egypt. The question is:

Do you believe that the Egyptian government is serious in pursuing Israeli officials implicated in the mass killing of Egyptian prisoners of war?

With over 1,200 responding so far, here is the breakdown:

Yes.............3%

No.............97%

Reviving the Arab "Peace" Initiative
By Baha Boukhari

A Surge It Is.....


Nine U.S. soldiers killed north of Baghdad

"Nine American soldiers have been killed and four wounded in two separate attacks in northern and north-eastern Iraq, the US military has said.

"Six Task Force Lightning soldiers were attacked while conducting combat operations in Salah ad Din province on March 5," a statement said on Tuesday.

"The soldiers died as a result of injuries sustained following an explosion near their vehicles."

In a second incident on the same day, three American soldiers were killed by a roadside bomb in Diyala. One soldier was wounded......."

Monday, March 5, 2007

Speak Bird, Speak Again



Speak Bird, Speak Again
Palestinian Arab Folktales
Ibrahim Muhawi and Sharif Kanaana
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS
Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford
© 1989 The Regents of the University of California

This is the book Hamas' "ministry of education" decided to burn. You can read it online.

The Book Burners of Hamas


A Disturbing Article Contributed by Lucia

Dr Kana'nah: Burning my book "speak bird, speak again" is like burning my son

"Ramallah - Ma'an - Professor of sociology and anthropology at Bir Zeit University, Ashraf Kana'nah, has commented on the decision of the Palestinian ministry of education to burn copies of the book he collated with his colleague, Dr Ibrahim Mhawi. The book, collated from Palestinian oral narratives, is entitled "Speak bird, speak again". Dr Kana'nah described the ministry's decision as "cultural terrorism"; while the ministry claims that stories in the book contain "immoral expression".

Kana'nah told Ma'an's correspondent in Ramallah that "those who conducted such measures are not related to academia", since he found no more than three references to sexual activity in a 400 page book.

Dr Kana'nah expressed his disturbance over the burning of his book, saying that "every book one writes is continuity of his own ideology, as much as the son is the biological continuity of his father." He added that it was the ministry of culture who decided to distribute the book at the schools, and they also funded the printing of 3000 copies.

The book was misinterpreted, explained the author, "since it was not meant to be taught to children, as it is taught at the masters and doctorate level [in literature studies]". Kana'nah himself taught the study of the book in the masters programs at Bir Zeit University. In addition, the English version of the book is studied as part of literature courses at both Berkeley and Chicago Universities. It was the best-selling Palestinian academic text book in foreign countries.

"The book should be read by teachers at schools, rather than be given to students, and if the teacher is embarrassed to read some expressions, which the students hear every day, he does not deserve to be a teacher," declared Dr Kana'nah.

The ministry of education allegedly endorsed a decision at the beginning of February to destroy all copies of the book, "Speak bird, speak again" at the libraries of governmental schools under the pretext of containing "filthy expressions".

This book, first published in 1989, contains forty-five folktales drawn from a collection of two hundred tales narrated by women from different areas of historic Palestine (the Galilee, the West Bank, and Gaza). The stories collected were chosen on the basis of their popularity, their aesthetic and narrative qualities, and what they tell about popular Palestinian culture dating back many centuries. In order to maintain the specificity of these tales, it was necessary to transcribe them in the original colloquial dialect in which they were narrated. The tales are accompanied by an in-depth study that compares them to similar cultural products in Arab and world cultures.

For his part, member of the Palestinian People's Party's politburo, Haidar Awadallah, described the decision as "a threat to liquidate the democratic heritage of the Palestinian people and their cultural, literary and ideological pluralism". This is done on behalf of "a fundamental, superficial and close preaching."

Ministerial reaction

Palestinian minister of education, Dr Nasser Addin Ash-Shaer, denied on Monday that his ministry had taken the decision to burn copies of the folktales, claiming that he only heard the news in the media.

Ash-Shaer told Ma'an that the issue "is not about a school's text book, but it is a book that was written in the informal accent which the educational orientation of the ministry found inappropriate for the accent." The minister also denied the news reported about the ministry's decision to burn the book or destroy the copies.

The minister added, "there has been no such decision, and we are not against the people's heritage. Besides, the book is available in the book stores, but it arrived in the schools without our knowledge, and so, the ministry's office is still checking the issue... the book is written in an informal language, which is inappropriate to be taught at schools, as schools teach the formal Arabic only. Furthermore, the book includes filthy expressions, which we can not afford to accept in our schools, and so it is being withdrawn from the libraries only.""

At the Bottom of the Barrel

BBC survey claims Israel has least positive image in the world

"LONDON  Israel, Iran and the United States are the countries with the most negative image in a globe-spanning survey of attitudes toward 12 major nations. Canada and Japan came out best in the poll, released on Monday.

The survey for the British Broadcasting Corp.'s World Service asked more than 28,000 people to rate 12 countries  Britain, Canada, China, France, India, Iran, Israel, Japan, North Korea, Russia, the United States and Venezuela  as having a positive or negative influence on the world.

Israel was viewed negatively by 56 percent of respondents and positively by 17 percent; for Iran, the figures were 54 percent and 18 percent. The United States had the third-highest negative ranking, with 51 percent citing it as a bad influence and 30 percent as a good one. Next was North Korea, which was viewed negatively by 48 percent and positively by 19 percent......"

A "Government" of Beggars


Windbag du Jour






MP Tafesh asks USA, EU to revise bias in favor of Zionists

"AL-KHALIL, (PIC)-- MP Khaled Tafesh on Monday urged USA president George Bush to revise his policies in the Middle East especially in Palestine and to spare the lives of his soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He asked the USA and the EU countries, which are biased in favor of Israel, to stop backing the culprit against the victim and appealed to them to lift the oppressive siege on the Palestinian people imposed more than a year now to punish them for electing Hamas to rule them......."

***

Such leadership! This guy is speaking in exactly the same way the Palestinians begged the British in the 1920s. Nothing learned in 90 years; keep begging, brother!

Robert Fisk on Osama bin Laden at 50, Iraqi Death Squads and Why the Middle East is More Dangerous Now Than in Past 30 Years


Democracy Now!
With Amy Goodman


"Robert Fisk is a veteran war correspondent and one of the world"s most experienced journalists covering the Middle East. He has reported from across the Arab world for the past thirty years. He was in Iraq in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war, in the early 1990s during the Persian Gulf War and most recently during the U.S. invasion and occupation. He has also reported on the civil wars in Algeria and Lebanon, the Iranian revolution, the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, and Israel"s occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.

Robert Fisk joins me in our firehouse studio......

AMY GOODMAN: You mention Lebanon. Let's talk about the situation there today. This is where you have been based for the last thirty years.

ROBERT FISK: Thirty-one, almost, now, yeah. Yes, I mean, I was, you know, like I suppose most Lebanese, I felt, up until July the 12th, the beginning of the war between Hezbollah and the Israelis last summer, that maybe Lebanon had a chance. You know, it was being rebuilt. There wasn't enough money trickling down from the top to the bottom; it was still a lopsided society with the Shiites being the poor and the oppressed as usual. But I thought until we came across -- you know, even when the Shiites pulled out of the government, which was a very serious matter because it meant that once again we were emphasizing the sectarian nature of Lebanese politics, that there might be some form of compromise.

But once we had that strike, which turned so violent -- you know, I turned up on Corniche Mazraa in the western part of Beirut, and there must have been 7,000 people, Muslims, Shiites and Sunnis, chucking rocks and stones at each other. There were seven Lebanese soldiers trying to get between them. I went with them taking pictures. I mean, the stones were bouncing off the soldiers. People were chucking rocks from the top of sixteen-story buildings. It was very dangerous. I thought, civil war was going to restart that day.

And one of the dangerous things at that point was that the young people who were involved were too young to remember the civil war, which of course actually ended in 1990. They might have a faint memory. They would have heard their parents talking about it. And they didn’t realize how quickly it would escalate, how quickly you could deteriorate. Even Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah -- well, the Hezbollah is a very disciplined organization, of course -- was shocked at the speed with which his strike, his civil disobedience strike, descended into total street violence. Then, of course, two days later, guns came on the streets.

Very dangerous situation, because it keeps going back into a sort of semi-denial of the political crisis. We think, OK, well, Lebanon is out of the news, it’s OK again. But the reality is that Lebanon is in great danger of splintering apart again. And I went out, a short time, a short while ago, before I came to America, for dinner in a Sunni area of Beirut. It's a mixed area, but mostly Sunni, and I remember saying, well, how are you getting on with your Shiite neighbors these days? And the woman at the table said, well, actually, most of them have gone on holiday. They've left their keys with their neighbors. They have gone to stay with relatives elsewhere.

Now, that's how it begins. That’s how it happened in Baghdad, people moving out of Sunni areas, people moving out of Shiite areas, if they’re a different religion. One of the frightening things that happened during those January days of violence, including the area where there was shooting used, is that the scenes of street combat were on the same green line of the civil war. In other words, the old fracture between east and west, Beirut and parts of West Beirut, reopened at the exact -- Hazmieh -- exactly the same point. I spent parts of the civil war at Hazmieh watching the fighting, and there, on the same piece of road, it broke apart again. It's like, you know, you keep stitching it up, and it comes undone.

AMY GOODMAN: What about Seymour Hersh's report, where he says that the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia are pumping money for covert operations in many areas of the Middle East, including Lebanon, Syria and Iran, in an effort to strengthen Saudi-supported Sunni Islam groups and weaken Iranian-backed Shiites. Some of the covert money has been given to jihadist groups in Lebanon with ties to al-Qaeda.

ROBERT FISK: Look, Seymour Hersh said that we were going to invade Iraq, and I thought we wouldn't, and he was right and I was wrong. So when Seymour Hersh says we're going to bombard Iran, I remain silent. When Seymour Hersh tells me -- he was in Beirut, of course; he met Nasrallah there -- that we’re pumping money into Sunni extremist groups, I think, well, hang on a second, he got it right and I got it wrong on Iraq.

Look, the truth of the matter is that these various organizations -- and there are some al-Qaeda-type groups, groupuscules, tiny ones in Lebanon, and I’ve met them -- they don't need money from outside. They've got money. Everyone in Lebanon who’s got weapons has money. It's like the same nonsense: we talk about how the Iranians are teaching the Iraqi Shiite insurgents to make bombs. Iraqi insurgents know how to make bombs. They don't need the Iranians to come and teach them. I don't think a lot of money is reaching these people. What I do think is that these various extreme groups are quite possibly being mobilized or encouraged by elements within the -- what we now call the American-supported Lebanese government -- what a kiss of death that is for the Siniora government -- encouraged to remain where they are and to be available in certain circumstances.

You know, a large number of the killings that have taken place in Beirut are not necessarily carried out by the Syrians. Hariri, I think, was a Syrian-engineered plot, yes. But, for example, Pierre Gemayel’s murder, a lot of Lebanese say, well, maybe it was another Christian group behind that. One of the things you find in Lebanon is that there are various groups, some of them Palestinian -- we call them extremists or terrorists, whatever you like -- who are available to help anyone. They can make temporary alliances. They don't need to be given $5 million on the quiet by someone with American money.

The real danger now, you see, is that with an ideological government like you have and like we, I suppose, think we have, we constantly want to assist people who will join us in our campaign. You can go back to Afghanistan. We wanted the warlords on our side against bin Laden. Now we're saddled with the warlords, which is why we can't stamp out the opium trade or the drugs trade. In Iraq, we started --
........"

Click Here to Watch, Listen or Read Transcript of This Long Interview

The Liberators Are Camera-Shy....


Afghan Media: US Troops Deleted Images

"Afghan journalists covering the aftermath of a suicide bomb attack and shooting in eastern Afghanistan Sunday said U.S. troops deleted their photos and video and warned them not to publish or air any images of U.S. troops or a car where three Afghans were shot to death.....

A freelance photographer working for The Associated Press and a cameraman working for AP Television News said a U.S. soldier deleted their photos and video showing a four-wheel drive vehicle in which three people were shot to death about 100 yards from the suicide bombing. The AP plans to lodge a protest with the American military.

The photographer, Rahmat Gul, said witnesses at the scene told him the three had been shot to death by U.S. forces fleeing the attack. The two AP freelancers arrived at the site about a half hour after the suicide bombing, Gul said.

"When I went near the four-wheel drive, I saw the Americans taking pictures of the same car, so I started taking pictures," Gul said. "Two soldiers with a translator came and said, 'Why are you taking pictures? You don't have permission.'"

It wasn't clear why the accredited journalists would need permission to take photos of a civilian car on a public highway.

Gul said the U.S. troops took his camera, deleted his photos and returned it to him. The journalists came across another American, showed their identification cards, and he agreed that they could take pictures.

A Western military official who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to release the information said the troops were Marine Special Operations Forces, the Marine Corps component created in February 2006 of the U.S. Special Operations Command.

"The same soldier who took my camera came again and deleted my photos," Gul said. "The soldier was very angry ... I told him, 'They gave us permission,' but he didn't listen."

Gul's new photos were also deleted, and the American, speaking through a translator, warned him that he did not want to see any AP photos published anywhere. The American also raised his fist in anger as if he were going to hit him, but he did not strike, Gul said.

Lt. Col. David Accetta, a U.S. military spokesman, said he did not have any confirmed reports that coalition forces "have been involved in confiscating cameras or deleting images."

Khanwali Kamran, a reporter for the Afghan channel Ariana Television, was in a small group of journalists working alongside Gul. Kamran said the American soldiers also deleted his footage.

"They warned me that if it is aired ... then, 'You will face problems,'" Kamran said.

Taqiullah Taqi, a reporter for Afghanistan's largest television station, Tolo TV, said Americans were using abusive language.

"According to the translator, they said, 'Delete them, or we will delete you,'" Taqi said.

A freelance cameraman for AP Television News said that about 100 yards from the bomb site, a U.S. officer told him that he could not go any closer to the scene but that he could shoot footage. The cameraman asked not to be named for his own safety.

"Then I started filming the suicide attack site, where there was a body and U.S. soldiers, and farther away, there was a four-wheel drive vehicle in which three people were shot to death," he said.

As he was filming, he said, a U.S. soldier and translator "ordered us not to move." The cameraman said they were very angry and deleted any footage that included the Americans, as well as part of an interview from a demonstration. Hundreds of Afghans had gathered to protest the violence.

Reporters Without Borders condemned the actions of the U.S. forces, saying they dealt with the press poorly.

"Why did the soldiers do it if they don't have anything to hide? The situation is very tense in Afghanistan, and the media should be able to report about it freely and safely," said Jean-Francois Julliard, a spokesman for the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders."

US pressurizing Pak to get its support for attack on Iran: Gul


ISLAMABAD: Former ISI Chief, Gen (retd) Hameed Gul has said that the Untied States is paving the way to use Pakistan's territory for its expected attack on Iran in order to shift the blame of its failure in Afghanistan to Pakistan.

"Talking to a private TV Channel, Gen (retd) Hameed Gul said that NATO forces have intensified their activities on Pak-Afghan border as they are frustrated due to their failure in Afghanistan.

Former ISI Chief has said that US backed Karzai government has been completely failed in Afghanistan and the United States has now realized that they are now facing strong resistance from Taliban.

General (retd) Hamid Gul said that its an American policy to use different tactics to pressurize Pakistan and the main objective of recent visit of US Vice President Dick Cheney to pressurize Pakistan as US would need Pakistan's support and Balochistan land to attack Iran. He said that it may be the possibility that Pakistani government is refusing the United States to given permission to use its land......"

Liars Caught on Camera



US seizes Afghan shooting footage

"US forces in Afghanistan tried to confiscate video and destroy photographic evidence taken after a shooting incident that left at least 10 civilians dead, witnesses have told Al Jazeera.

Footage obtained by Al Jazeera shows the scene in Nangarhar province immediately after US forces opened fire following a car bomb attack on their convoy. The footage included a scenes of local people in shock, treating the wounded and pulling bodies from the debris left by the shooting......

'Complete lie'

Witnesses say the suicide bomber had acted alone, that there were no accomplices and that US troops had panicked, firing at anything that moved immediately after the attack.

One told Al Jazeera: "There were no gunmen, this is a complete lie. This is a peaceful area, we don't have guns."

The dead included an 80-year-old man, whose grand-son said: "A bomb exploded, my grandfather sat in a car and at that time American soldiers were shooting into my grandfather's car."........"

Preparing for the Arab "Summit"

A Horse of a Different Color


Obama, the Lobby, and the next war

By Justin Raimondo

"It had to happen sooner or later, and Barack Obama's startling rise to near the top of the Democratic presidential pack made it sooner – I'm talking about his speech to the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). It starts out with a riff about his ride in an IDF helicopter and how this made him "truly see how close everything is and why peace through security is the only way for Israel." But of course the Palestinians are just as close to the Israelis as the Israelis are to them – and the Israelis have far more arms (provided by the U.S.) and are surely not averse to using them. So what is "the only way" for the Palestinians? Yet there can be no "peace through security" for the Palestinians, since there is no security from Israeli air strikes and repeated invasions of Palestinian territory.

The maudlin emotionalism of Obama's appeal is nowhere more apparent than in this speech, and nowhere more inappropriately one-sided. But, here, listen to Obama tell it:

"Our helicopter landed in the town of Kiryat Shmona on the border. What struck me first about the village was how familiar it looked. The houses and streets looked like ones you might find in a suburb in America. I could imagine young children riding their bikes down the streets. I could imagine the sounds of their joyful play just like my own daughters. There were cars in the driveway. The shrubs were trimmed. The families were living their lives."

Oh, please spare us! Does Mr. Obama really not know that there are – or were – similar communities in the occupied territories? Does he really not know that countless Palestinian villages – with "houses and streets like you might find in a suburb in America" – have been demolished by Israeli tractors? Can Obama imagine a young Palestinian child riding his bike down the street – can he imagine his joyful play? Can he imagine a car in the driveway, the shrubs trimmed – the families living their lives in the moment before the Israelis wiped it all out in their ruthless campaign of conquest and ethnic cleansing?......

As if that wasn't enough, he went on to endorse yet another prospective war, assuring his audience that he is willing to sign on to both prongs of the renewed Israeli-American aggression in the region. Obama touts his proposal for a "phased redeployment" (never say "withdrawal"!) from Iraq as giving us a chance to focus on the real threat to peace in the region: Iran. Bravely coming out against Holocaust denial – that Obama sure is a risk-taker! – this rising Democratic star delivered a truly Orwellian account of the Lebanese-Israeli war......

Obama quails at the very thought that the Palestinians would have a government that includes Hamas, but nowhere does he mention that Hamas was elected. Nor does the presence of the party of Avigdor Lieberman in the Israeli government raise so much as an eyebrow. Israel is praised by Obama for being "the only established democracy," but Palestinian elections and Israeli elections – like Palestinian lives and Israeli lives – are not to be equated......

Obama went before AIPAC, skillfully executed the ritualized gestures of obeisance without too brazenly defying his antiwar constituency, and in this way proved his mettle. The exact meaning of this ceremony was prefigured in "The Israel Lobby," a Harvard University study by Professors John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt:

"The goal is to prevent critical comments from getting a fair hearing in the political arena. Controlling the debate is essential to guaranteeing U.S. support, because a candid discussion of U.S.-Israeli relations might lead Americans to favor a different policy."......

But Obama is a horse of an entirely different color, and, no, I'm not talking about his skin color. He is not an alternative to the still hawkish Democratic Party establishment – hawkish, that is, compared to the average American voter – but only the appearance of one. He's all form and no content – a perfect replica of rebellion for the new millennium: slick, bromidic, and phony as all get-out. He's the Democrats' Wendell Willkie, the man who came out of nowhere, a public relations creation. Obama will disarm the Left on account of his color and overwhelm the Right on the sheer strength of his star power. Or so his strategists dream. In the end, however, our foreign policy will remain pretty much the same: aggressive, arrogant, and the cause of our ultimate undoing. "

Sunday, March 4, 2007

قمة الرياض... اخطر القمم؟

An Important Analysis (Arabic)

"عبد الباري عطوان

05/03/2007

تتصاعد الأحاديث، في السر والعلن، حول ادخال تعديلات علي مبادرة السلام العربية تسقط الشق المتعلق بحق العودة وهو الشرط الذي تفرضه الدولة العبرية لقبولها والاعتراف بها.
هذه الاحاديث تتزامن مع اقتراب انعقاد القمة العربية العادية في الرياض في اواخر الشهر الحالي، والزيارة التي من المقرر ان تقوم بها السيدة كوندوليزا رايس وزيرة الخارجية الامريكية إلي المنطقة بعد عشرة ايام.
الصحف العبرية تتحدث هذه الايام باسهاب عن اللقاءات التي اجراها ويجريها الامير بندر بن سلطان بن عبد العزيز امين عام مجلس الامن القومي السعودي مع مسؤولين اسرائيليين من اجل التنسيق بشأن الملف النووي الايراني وكيفية معالجته، وتعديل مبادرة السلام العربية بما يؤدي الي تقديم صيغة مبتكرة تلتف حول حق العودة، وتجعله محصورا باراضي الدولة الفلسطينية المستقبلية، اي في الضفة والقطاع وتوطين اللاجئين في مناطق اقامتهم في سورية ولبنان والاردن اذا ما فضلوا البقاء في مخيماتهم.

........

الشعب الفلسطيني لا يتعرض للتجويع والحصار بسبب خياره الديمقراطي فقط، وانما لتيئيسه، واجباره علي قبول صيغة التسوية الجديدة، والتنازل عن حق العودة بشكل نهائي، علي اعتبار ان هذه التسوية هي ثمرة توافق عربي ودعم كامل من قبل الدول الاسلامية السنية الرئيسية، أي ان عليه ان يرضخ للإرادتين العربية والاسلامية اذا اراد ان يحصل علي لقمة الخبز له ولأطفاله.
وليس صدفة ان تكون النقطة الأبرز علي جدول اعمال حكومة الوحدة الوطنية هي كيفية مأسسة التسول، ورفع الحصار، وايصال المساعدات العربية والدولية، والتجاوب بشكل مباشر او غير مباشر مع شروط اللجنة الرباعية الدولية.
المطلوب حكومة فلسطينية تجيد التسول وتنضم لتحالف محور المعتدلين ، وتسهل المشروع الامريكي الجديد لضرب ايران ومفاعلها النووي، واسقاط النظام السوري، وانهاء المقاومة باعتبارها ارهابا، اما المقابل فربما يكون دولة مؤقتة منزوعة الكرامة، وبلا حدود واضحة، ولا سيادة، فقط رشوة مالية ضخمة، تكون عبارة عن حقنة تخديرية مؤقتة، ريثما ينجح المشروع الامريكي الجديد، ثم يتم مسح كل ذلك والتراجع عنه، تماما مثلما حدث لاتفاقات اوسلو وصيغة الحكم الذاتي التي تمخضت عنها. ألم تتخل الولايات المتحدة عن افغانستان ومجاهديها بعد نجاح مشروعها في طرد السوفييت وإذلالهم؟
"

Abbas, Haniyeh meet in Gaza, fail to make progress on unity gov't


What Palestinian "Unity" Talks Need

"Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh failed to make progress on talks toward forming a unity government, an official said early Monday.

Hamas cabinet spokesman Ghazi Hamad said they hoped to present a government by the end of the period allotted to Haniyeh, which expires in two weeks.

"We have not completed the consultations today. They will continue over the coming days," he said ......."

أضعف الإيمان!


بقلم : د.إبراهيم حمّامي

"قد نتفهم أن يتلهى سياسيو فلسطين وقادتها باتفاق مكة وتشكيل حكومة الوحدة الوطنية، وقد نجد لهم عذراً في محادثاتهم ولقاءاتهم الماراثونية للتباحث في الوزارات والوزراء، وقد نفهم انشغالهم المطلق بتفسير وتحليل الكلمات من نوعية "احترام" و"التزام"، ومن الممكن أن نستوعب أن خروج حكومة الوحدة الوطنية أمر مفصلي هام في تاريخنا المعاصر، لكن ما لا يمكن أن يستوعبه عقل أن يذبح الشعب الفلسطيني ولا يستوجب ذلك وقفة منهم جادة حاسمة في وجه آلة الإجرام الحاقدة التي تعيث خراباً وتدميراً بكل ما تطاله، وفي وضح النهار، وعلى مرأى ومسمع من العالم الذي يضغط على شعبنا صباح مساء ليركع ويخضع.

منذ اللحظات الأولى لتوقيع اتفاق مكة والاحتلال يصعّد من وتيرة هجماته على شعبنا الصامد في محاولة يائسة لضرب معنوياته والتأثير على قراره بالمقاومة المشروعة العادلة، وبلغت ذروة الاعتداءات قبل ايام باقتحام مدينة نابلس في حملة همجية بربرية، لم يكن نصيبها من القيادة الفلسطينية إلا التنديد والاستنكار.

ضعف الرد الفلسطيني، أو لنقل انعدامه، خاصة مع وجود طرف فلسطيني يصر على اللقاء مع المحتل دون شروط، بل يزيد على ذلك مطالبته بتثبيت التهدئة الهشة في جزء من فلسطين ليذبح جزءا آخر منها، وطرف آخر يعتبر أن اي عدوان هو لإجهاض اتفاق مكة، اللاموقف هذا والتمسك بحبائل الوهم شجّع المحتل على التمادي أكثر وأكثر، وأرسل رسالة واهنة لكنها واضحة مفادها: لسنا بصدد اتخاذ أي خطوات من اي نوع سياسية أو شعبية أو جماهيرية أو غيرها، لأن التمسك باتفاق مكة هو الرد الوحيد لنا، ومولد حكومة جديدة تحت أي مسمى ودون تحفظات - حتى ولو كان من ضمن وزرائها افسد الفاسدين أو من تلطخت اياديهم بدماء شعبنا- هو المواجهة الوحيدة لدينا!

قبل أن يسيء البعض الظن، فلست بحال ضد اتفاق الشعب الفلسطيني وحقن دمائه، ولا ضد حكومة الوحدة الوطنية، لكني وبصراحة تامة ضد أن يتحول الاتفاق والحكومة لشماعة نعلق عليها ضعفنا وعجزنا، لتصبح عذرنا الدائم وتبريرنا لانتصارنا المعنوي على المحتل، وضد أن تطغى أخبار الاتفاق والحكومة على أخبار الحرب الحقيقية التي يشنها المحتل الغاصب على شعب فلسطين، في ظل إما تعتيم إعلامي أو تركيز غير مبرر ولا مفهوم على زيارات الزعماء ومباحثات الأخوة ولقاءات وتصريحات القادة.

معالم الحرب الحقيقية ظهرت واضحة جلية لتشمل كل شيء وبكل الوسائل مما استدعى صدور بيانات استغاثة من نابلس لم تلق آذانا صاغية بعد، وهذه بعض الجرائم التي ارتكبت بحق أبناء شعبنا وقضيته وحقوقه خلال ال 24 ساعة الماضية، دون أن تجد لها مكاناً حقيقياً لا اعلامياً ولا سياسياً ولا شعبياً، والقادم أعظم

إعدام ثلاثة من مقاتلي "سرايا القدس" ، الذراع العسكري لحركة الجهاد الإسلامي في مدينة جنين بدم بارد وهم: أشرف السعدي، أحد قادة السرايا في جنين، وبلال أبو ناعسة، وعلاء بريكة .

إعادة اجتياح مدينة نابلس وللمرة الثانية خلال يومين بأكثر من 140 آلية وعربة عسكرية مدعومة بالجرافات العسكرية ومن جميع المحاور وسط تحليق طائرات الاستطلاع، وتقسيم المدينة ومحاصرة مستشفياتها الثلاثة رفيديا والوطني والاتحاد.

في عمل جبان: إختطاف عدد من أقارب من تسميهم قوات الإحتلال مطلوبين للضغط عليهم لتسليم أنفسهم منهم والدة أمين لبادة، وشقيقات وأشقاء مهدي أبو غزالة

اقتحام موجات البث للمحطات المحلية وبث إعلانات خاصة بجيش الإحتلال

اجبار فتاة فلسطينية في العشرينات من عمرها تحت تهديد السلاح على التجرد من ملابسها قبل اعتقالها ومصادرة ما بحوزتها من حقائب وأمتعة وذلك على حاجز الكونتينر شمال شرق بيت لحم .

الإعلان عن مخطط لبناء حى إستيطاني جديد في القدس يضم 11 ألف وحدة سكنية بالقرب من حاجز قلنديا، هو الأكبر في منطقة القدس منذ عام 1967 !

إختطاف النائب حاتم قفيشة من كتلة "التغيير والإصلاح" في الخليل

إصدار أمر بإغلاق فندق "الكومدور" في حي الطور في القدس الشرقية، من المفوّض العام للشرطة موشي كرادي، وذلك لمنع عقد المؤتمر الصحفي الذي كان مقرراً عقده، من قبل شخصيات دينية، إسلامية ومسيحية، يتم خلاله توقيع وثيقة "العهد والميثاق" لحفظ القدس والأقصى وسائر المقدسات الإسلامية والمسيحية.

تسريب أنباء عن خطة لاجتياح قطاع غزة برياً بحجة الأنفاق.

رغم إعلان الحرب وأدلته السابقة هناك من سيطرح سؤال مشروع: ماذا يمكن لنا ان نفعل؟ لكن ايضاً إجابته مشروعة لمن أراد أن يقف موقفا شجاعا حاسما، ومن هذا المنطلق وحتى نخرج من باب التشخيص والتحليل نقترح ونطالب بما يلي:

الإعلان الفوري عن وقف المباحثات والمفاوضات مع أعضاء اللجنة الرباعية وكل وفود العالم حتى يتوقف العدوان وبشكل فوري غير مشروط.

تحديد شروط فلسطينية واضحة لا لبس فيها قبل لقاء أي مبعوث من أهمها رفع الحصار الجائر وإطلاق سراح الأسرى والإفراج عن الأموال المحتجزة وتحرير المعابر

تجميد كل مؤسسات السلطة الفلسطينية والاعلان عن إضراب شامل ومفتوح يستثنى منه قطاعي الصحة والتعليم.

النزول إلى الشوارع والساحات والميادين ومواجهة المحتل جماهيرياً وشعبياً في كل نقاط التماس .

التركيز إعلامياً وفي جميع الوسائل على ممارسات الإحتلال وجرائمه

هل هذه الخطوات أمر واقعي يمكن تطبيقه أم خطوات مثالية حالمة؟، بالتأكيد هي قابلة للتطبيق لسبب بسيط أن ما تحتاجه هو قرار فلسطيني بحت، ولنتذكر ان السلطة والحكومة وغيرها هي احتياجات دولية ايضاً لتهدئة الأوضاع، وإذا كان العالم يفرض على الشعب الفلسطيني حصاراً جائرا، مطالباً إياه بالرضوخ للمحتل، فعلى ذات العالم أن يتحمل مسؤولياته كاملة في وقف العدوان، أو ليتحمل عواقب انتفاضة فلسطينية ثالثة باتت أقرب من أي وقت مضى.

نعم تعب الشعب الفلسطيني وأنهكه الحصار والمقاطعة، ونال منه الجوع والفقر، لكن هل يعتقد اي منا أن المحتل سيتركنا وشأننا بحكومة وحدة وطنية أو بدونها؟ وهل إدارة شؤوننا اليومية يعني غض الطرف عن ممارسات المحتل؟ وبالتأكيد لسنا بيائسين أو عاجزين حتى عن قول كلمة "لا"، كما يدعي حافظ البرغوثي في مقاله المعنون "العجز" حين قال: أن الفلسطينيين عاجزون عن إدارة شؤونهم، وكأنهم قصّر بحاجة إلى رعاية ولي أمر، مضيفا أن "العجز سمة المرحلة الفلسطينية الراهنة، عجز القيادات وعجز الكوادر وعجز المقاومة وتسرب هذا العجز إلى المواطن الذي بدا يائسا مما يحدث".

على قيادات الشعب الفلسطيني تقع مسؤولية حماية الشعب واتخاذ ما يلزم للدفاع عنه، وفي ظل ميزان قوى غير عادل وظالم علينا أن نتسلح بكل ما لدينا وليس أقله رفض ما يجري واعلان العصيان على العالم برمته، لأننا نملك أقوى سلاح على الإطلاق وهو قرارانا وإرادتنا، إلا إذا ارتضينا - كما ارتضى البعض- أن نتحول لوكلاء للمحتل، أو لشعب همه الوحيد بطنه، ليأكل ويشرب وينام كالأنعام أو أضل سبيلا... معاذ الله.

الإحتلال قائم وموجود على كل حبة تراب من فلسطيننا الحبيبة وباعتراف حتى من اعترف بالمحتل وشرعيته، ليتحمل الاحتلال نتائج احتلاله بدلاً من تجميله بأوهام السلطة والسيادة، وليتحمل العالم معه تبعات ظلمه ودعمه للجلاد على حساب الضحية، ولنقف ولو لمرة تحت راية واحدة وبصوت واحد وباتفاق واحد - وليكن اتفاق مكة- لنمارس حقنا المشروع المكفول بكل شرائع السماء والأرض، لنبني مجتمعنا وحكومتنا ومؤسساتنا، لكن في نفس الوقت لنواجه الاحتلال البغيض.

هذا أضعف الإيمان! "

Sy Hersh: Neolib Disinfo Operative?


Once in a while, Kurt Nimmo goes over the edge; this article is an example. I disagree with this article by Nimmo and I strongly agree with what Seymour Hersh has reported. Saudi Arabia and the rest of the "moderate" Arab kennel have been working to stir anti-Shia sentiment and to agitate against Iran for sometime. The boy king of Jordan has been warning about a so-called Shia crescent, so has Mubarak. The "moderate" mongrels were openly cheerleading for Israel against Hizbullah last summer. The facts on the ground in Lebanon support what Hersh reported about Al-Qaeda-affiliated "Sunni" groups in Lebanon receiving arms and financing from the Siniora government and outside financiers, including KSA. Just because Ahmadinejad met King Abdullah does not prove that KSA is working to reduce sectarian tensions. The trip could have been to deliver a warning by Iran that this sectarian war that KSA is inflaming (on behalf of Usrael) could easily consume the Arab "moderate" leaders and their regimes.

A senior Palestinian leader who was involved in the discussions in Mecca that led to the agreement to establish a so-called "national unity government" was told bluntly by Saudi officials, "a Sunni-Shia war is coming, which side are you on?"

Tony Sayegh


"......If so, this does not explain why “Sunni and Shi’ite heavyweights Saudi Arabia and Iran” are working together “to fight the spread of sectarian strife that threatens to spill over from their neighbor Iraq,” according to Reuters. “Saudi King Abdullah held talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who was on his first official trip to Saudi Arabia. A Saudi official said earlier the kingdom would seek Iran’s help to ease sectarian tensions in Iraq erupting into full-blown civil war.” If indeed Saudi Arabia is working with the neocons to undermine the influence of the Shi’a in Lebanon—and if we are to believe Hersh and his “sources,” Iran itself—how do we explain Abdullah and Ahmadinejad making nice?....

Considering this, it makes perfect sense Sy Hersh, writing for a “liberal” magazine revamped by Tina “Lady Evans” Brown, who got her start working for the “conservative” Sunday Telegraph, would serve as a disinfo conduit, writing one article after another taking the neocons to task, much to their chagrin."---Kurt Nimmo.

By Mike Luckovich

It Doesn't Matter If Hillary Apologizes for Her Iraq War Vote


Hillary Clinton knew years before she voted for the Iraq war that Saddam Hussein didn't have WMDs -- Bill Clinton lied about Iraq's weapons programs to justify attacking the country in 1998.

By Scott Ritter

"Senator Hillary Clinton wants to become President Hillary Clinton. "I'm in, and I'm in to win," she said, announcing her plans to run for the Democratic nomination for the 2008 Presidential election.

Let there be no doubt that Hillary Clinton is about as slippery a species of politician that exists, one who has demonstrated an ability to morph facts into a nebulous blob which blurs the record and distorts the truth. While she has demonstrated this less than flattering ability on a number of issues, nowhere is it so blatant as when dealing with the issue of the ongoing war in Iraq and Hillary Clinton's vote in favor of this war.

This issue won't be resolved even if Hillary Clinton apologizes for her Iraq vote, as other politicians have done, blaming their decision on faulty intelligence on Iraq's WMD capabilities. This is because, like many other Washington politicians at the time, including those now running for president, she had been witness to lies about Iraq's weapons programs to justify attacks on that country by her husband President Bill Clinton and his administration.......

"So it is with conviction," Hillary said at the moment of her vote, "that I support this resolution as being in the best interests of our Nation. A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our President and we say to him -- use these powers wisely and as a last resort. And it is a vote that says clearly to Saddam Hussein -- this is your last chance -- disarm or be disarmed."

It turned out Saddam was in fact already disarmed. And it turned out that Hillary's husband, President Bill Clinton, knew this when he ordered the bombing of Iraq in 1998. Hillary can try to twist and turn the facts as she defends the words she spoke when casting her fateful vote in favor of a war with Iraq. But no amount of re-writing history can shield her from the failed policies of her very own husband, policies she embraced willingly and whole heartedly when endorsing war.

Run, Hillary, run. But your race towards the White House will never outpace the hypocrisy and duplicity inherent in your decision to vote for war in Iraq. "

Officials: Abbas, Hamas forces expanding despite unity deal


The fools of PA Chairman Abbas' guard standing in formation outside his headquarters in the West Bank city of Ramallah.

By Reuters

"Forces loyal to Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and the ruling Hamas movement are pushing ahead with expansion plans despite a unity government deal, Palestinian and Western officials said.

Workmen in the West Bank city of Jericho said they have stepped up construction of a 16-acre base for Abbas's presidential guard and are putting the finishing touches to a "college" for his intelligence service.

Since the power-sharing deal between Abbas's Fatah faction and Hamas Islamists was signed on February 8 in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, the presidential guard has set up a makeshift camp on newly-appropriated land next to the Karni commercial crossing in Gaza and has started training rerecruits there.

"This is a military base that needs money to be equipped, whether there is Mecca or not," a presidential guard commander said as shirtless recruits marched in formation behind him. "We have no lack of human resources but we lack equipment. Hamas has mortar bombs. Hamas has rockets. We don't have that."

The Islamic militant group Hamas has likewise been busy building up its own "executive force" to 12,000 members, double the current size. "We are working hard to accomplish that," spokesman Islam Shahwan said.

Zakaria al-Qaq, a security expert at al-Quds University, said the unity government deal between Fatah and Hamas political leaders may have stemmed factional fighting for now, but there was little trust between rival forces in the field.

"The Mecca agreement may look good, but on the ground it's not doable. The mobilization is still the same, the preparation is still the same, on both sides," he said.

Israeli intelligence services believe Hamas is stockpiling weapons for another round of fighting, either with Fatah or Israel, according to government officials.

"We're getting our money," a contractor at the presidential guard base in Jericho said as workers used a steamroller to level the new training grounds. The contractor said major construction work at the site should be completed in a month, but it was unclear when the new recruits would arrive.

Across from the ruins of Jericho's 8th century Hisham's Palace, the new "Security Sciences College" is close to opening its doors. Abbas's intelligence service has started placing job ads in local newspapers and hopes to begin classes this summer....."

***

Don't stop the celebrations for FAMAS, just pretend that Abbas is really a "Palestinian" president.

How Barack Obama learned to love Israel


Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 4 March 2007

"I first met Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Barack Obama almost ten years ago when, as my representative in the Illinois state senate, he came to speak at the University of Chicago. He impressed me as progressive, intelligent and charismatic. I distinctly remember thinking 'if only a man of this calibre could become president one day.'

On Friday Obama gave a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Chicago. It had been much anticipated in American Jewish political circles which buzzed about his intensive efforts to woo wealthy pro-Israel campaign donors who up to now have generally leaned towards his main rival Senator Hillary Clinton.

Reviewing the speech, Ha'aretz Washington correspondent Shmuel Rosner concluded that Obama "sounded as strong as Clinton, as supportive as Bush, as friendly as Giuliani. At least rhetorically, Obama passed any test anyone might have wanted him to pass. So, he is pro-Israel. Period."......

Obama offered not a single word of criticism of Israel, of its relentless settlement and wall construction, of the closures that make life unlivable for millions of Palestinians.

There was no comfort for the hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza who live in the dark, or the patients who cannot get dialysis, because of what Israeli human rights group B'Tselem termed "one cold, calculated decision, made by Israel's prime minister, defense minister, and IDF chief of staff" last summer to bomb the only power plant in Gaza," a decision that "had nothing to do with the attempts to achieve [the] release [of a captured soldier] nor any other military need." It was a gratuitous war crime, one of many condemned by human rights organizations, against an occupied civilian population who under the Fourth Geneva Convention Israel is obligated to protect.

While constantly emphasizing his concern about the threat Israelis face from Palestinians, Obama said nothing about the exponentially more lethal threat Israelis present to Palestinians. In 2006, according to B'Tselem, Israeli occupation forces killed 660 Palestinians of whom 141 were children -- triple the death toll for 2005. In the same period, 23 Israelis were killed by Palestinians, half the number of 2005 (by contrast, 500 Israelis die each year in road accidents)......

There was absolutely nothing in Obama's speech that deviated from the hardline consensus underpinning US policy in the region. Echoing the sort of exaggeration and alarmism that got the United States into the Iraq war, he called Iran "one of the greatest threats to the United States, to Israel, and world peace." While advocating "tough" diplomacy with Iran he confirmed that "we should take no option, including military action, off the table." He opposed a Palestinian unity government between Hamas and Fatah and insisted "we must maintain the isolation of Hamas" until it meets the Quartet's one-sided conditions. He said Hizbullah, which represents millions of Lebanon's disenfranchised and excluded, "threatened the fledgling movement for democracy" and blamed it for "engulf[ing] that entire nation in violence and conflict."......

As he came in from the cold and took off his coat, I went up to greet him. He responded warmly, and volunteered, "Hey, I'm sorry I haven't said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I'm hoping when things calm down I can be more up front." He referred to my activism, including columns I was contributing to the The Chicago Tribune critical of Israeli and US policy, "Keep up the good work!".

But Obama's gradual shift into the AIPAC camp had begun as early as 2002 as he planned his move from small time Illinois politics to the national scene. In 2003, Forward reported on how he had "been courting the pro-Israel constituency." He co-sponsored an amendment to the Illinois Pension Code allowing the state of Illinois to lend money to the Israeli government. Among his early backers was Penny Pritzker -- now his national campaign finance chair -- scion of the liberal but staunchly Zionist family that owns the Hyatt hotel chain. (The Hyatt Regency hotel on Mount Scopus was built on land forcibly expropriated from Palestinian owners after Israel occupied East Jerusalem in 1967). He has also appointed several prominent pro-Israel advisors......."

Is the Middle East heading towards a state of Chaos?


By Salim Nazzal

"Since publishing the Sunday times report in January 2007 that Israel is training two squads of planes to attack Iran the reports about attacking Iran whether from the USA or Israel or both has been intensified in the later period. In the view of Chomsky the American Israeli war on Lebanon last July 2006 is part of the American policy "to wipe out the deterrent so as to free up the United States and Israel for an eventual attack on Iran". http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/3999 .


Some reports linked between the late Rice visit to the region and the preparation towards striking Iran nuclear facilities a matter that has not been neither confirmed nor denied by Washington and Israel. But the language spoken in both states indicates that this question has not been far from the thinking.

However the last report that Israel got the permission of three Arab countries to use its air space to attack Iran is casting more light not only on the intention of Israel which has never been unknown but confirming the Israeli policy to "integrate" in the region through playing on the sectarian differences which is an old Israeli policy, according to Ina'am Ra'ad the late secretary of the Syrian party: "The diary of Moshe Sharette revealed the correspondence amongst the three Israeli statesmen, David Ben Gorion Moshe Sharette and Eliaho Sasson in February and March 1954, as to the splitting of Lebanon and the whole area into sectarian homelands, which were to emerge in the event of a civil war and turmoil"......

The "new" American approach has become based on who support its policy and who does not which confirmed the suspicion of the Arab democratic forces that the Us has not made a break with its historical policy which was based on supporting the oppressive regimes which serve the Us interests. On that base the Us has coined the terms (the moderate Arab countries!) vis avis (the extreme Arab countries!) to differentiate between those countries which accept its policy and who are not. This policy goes in harmony with the American/Israeli deconstruction policy to divide the region between moderates and extremes, as if demanding the rights of the Palestinians as formulated by the united nation resolutions 224,181 and 194 has become an extreme position while the silence on the Israeli daily violations in Palestine is moderation. The American political writer Seymour Hersh refers to the change in the American policy towards adopting the policy of playing off the sectarian differences in the so called (redirection) policy of the United States in its efforts to isolate and probably attack Iran......

Obviously, the USA has become near to the Israeli position in the question of playing off the sectarian elements, and in adopting the policy of encouraging all sorts of divisions with the aim to weaken the forces which resist the American and the Israeli domination projects in the region. Nevertheless, apart from the question of the credibility of (the airspace permission report) which was denied by the secretary general of the Arab league the point is that it consolidates earlier analysis that deconstructing the region is the title which summarized the Israeli policy since the times of Ben Gorion is being adopted by the Bush administration. However the Arab secretary general denial does not free Arab leaders from taking a strong position against any possible attack against Iran. Arab leaders need to remember that their position in supporting the American invasion to Iraq has aided the Us and Israel to play on the sectarian divisions in the region which threatening the integration and the stability of each Arab country......"

Windbag du Jour: Musa Abu Marzouq of Hamas

He is More Than A House Negro


Obama told of family's slave-owning history in deep South

An amateur genealogist has revealed a surprise in the family tree of the black contender in the race to be the Democrats' presidential candidate

"It is a question that few thought a man aiming to be America's first black President would ever have to answer: did your family once own slaves? But that question is now likely to be asked of Senator Barack Obama, who is bidding for the 2008 presidential nomination of the Democratic Party, in part on the appeal of his bi-racial background.

As the son of a black Kenyan father and a white Kansan mother, Obama has seemed to embody a harmonious vision of America's multiracial society. However, recent revelations have thrown up an unexpected twist in the tale.

Obama's ancestors on his white mother's side appear to have been slave owners. William Reitwiesner, an amateur genealogical researcher, has published a history of Obama's mother's family and discovered that her ancestors have a distinctly shadowy past.
Reitwiesner traced Obama's great-great-great-great-grandfather, George Washington Overall, and found that he owned two slaves in Kentucky: a 15-year-old girl and a 25-year-old man. He also found out that Obama's great-great-great-great-great-grandmother, Mary Duvall, also owned a pair of slaves listed in an 1850 census record. They were a 60-year-old man and a 58-year-old woman. In fact, the Duvalls were a wealthy family whose members were descended from a major landowner, Maureen Duvall, whose estate owned at least 18 slaves in the 17th century........"

How easy it is to put hatred on a map


A Good Article Contributed by Datta

Our guilt in this sectarian game is obvious. We want to divide our potential enemies

By Robert Fisk

"Why are we trying to divide up the peoples of the Middle East? Why are we trying to chop them up, make them different, remind them - constantly, insidiously, viciously, cruelly - of their divisions, of their suspicions, of their capacity for mutual hatred? Is this just our casual racism? Or is there something darker in our Western souls?

Take the maps. Am I the only one sickened by our journalistic propensity to publish sectarian maps of the Middle East? You know what I mean. We are now all familiar with the colour-coded map of Iraq. Shias at the bottom (of course), Sunnis in their middle "triangle" - actually, it's more like an octagon (even a pentagon) - and the Kurds in the north.

Or the map of Lebanon, where I live. Shias at the bottom (of course), Druze further north, Sunnis in Sidon and on the coastal strip south of Beirut, Shias in the southern suburbs of the capital, Sunnis and Christians in the city, Christian Maronites further north, Sunnis in Tripoli, more Shias to the east. How we love these maps. Hatred made easy......

We did the same in the Balkans. The Drina Valley of Bosnia was Muslim until the Serbs "cleansed" it. Srebrenica? Delete "safe area" and logo it "Serb". Krajina? Serb until the Croats took it. Did we call them "Croats"? Or "Catholics"? Or both on our maps?

Our guilt in this sectarian game is obvious. We want to divide the "other", "them", our potential enemies, from each other, while we - we civilised Westerners with our refined, unified, multicultural values - are unassailable. I could draw you a sectarian map of Birmingham, for example - marked "Muslim" and "non-Muslim" (there not being many Christians left in England - but no newspaper would print it. I could draw an extremely accurate ethnic map of Washington, complete with front-line streets between "black" and "white" communities but The Washington Post would never publish such a map.

Imagine the coloured fun The New York Times could have with Brooklyn, Harlem, the East River, black, white, brown, Italian, Catholic, Jew, Wasp. Or the Toronto Globe and Mail with French and non-French Canadian Montreal (the front line at one point follows the city Metro) or with Toronto (where "Little Italy" is now Ukrainian or Greek), and colour the suburb of Mississauga green for Muslim, of course. But we don't draw these Hitlerian maps for our societies. It would be unforgivable, bad taste, something "we" don't do in our precious, carefully guarded civilisation......

And we go on talking to our Sunni monarchs in the Middle East - we listen to their raving about the "Shia crescent" - no wonder we hate Shia Iran so much. And we go on dividing and scissoring up the lands, and printing more and more of our racial maps and I do wonder most seriously if we wish to promote civil war across this part of the world, and you know what? I rather think we do."