Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Israel, Iran top 'negative list'



A majority of people believe that Israel and Iran have a mainly negative influence in the world, a poll for the BBC World Service suggests.

It shows that the two countries are closely followed by the United States and North Korea.

The poll asked 28,000 people in 27 countries to rate a dozen countries plus the EU in terms of whether they have a positive or negative influence.

Canada, Japan and the EU are viewed most positively in the survey......"

US ally Musharraf in a tangle over Iran


By M K Bhadrakumar
Asia Times

"The intense pressure from Washington on President General Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan to be cooperative in the "war on terror" is yielding dramatic results, although perhaps not of the kind initially anticipated.

The Pakistan-Iran relationship, which has never been easy, has nosedived to a low point in recent weeks, even as Musharraf remains under pressure to do more in clamping down on al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan's tribal areas.

The moot point is to what extent Musharraf is willingly cooperating with US regional policy against Iran. He is skating on thin ice. He may endear himself to Washington as a brave leader in the Muslim world, but Pakistani public opinion is averse to serving the US agenda over Iran. This contradiction is fraught with dangers. It can only further accentuate Musharraf's isolation within Pakistan and add to the country's overall political uncertainties.

Washington could be miscalculating that only the Shi'ites in Sunni-dominated Pakistan will feel alienated by Musharraf's unfriendly attitude toward Tehran. The fact is, in emotive terms, the average Pakistani citizen is bound to view US hostility toward Iran as yet another instance of Washington's "crusade" against the Islamic world.....

All this says that, apart from sundry other minority groups of minuscule size, such as the Turkmens, Talysh, Qashqai, Lurs, Gilaki or Mazandarani, with hardly any surplus of militant ethnic nationalism available for inciting, the Balochs (who form roughly 2% of the population) offer themselves as the obvious choice for Washington to train its terrorism weapon against the Iranian regime......

However, there is a sideshow to these happenings that is no less profound. US intelligence operatives must be laughing all the way to Washington that they could manage with such ease what their suave diplomats (and wily Congress members) have had a hard time achieving in recent years - arresting Islamabad and New Delhi from finalizing the $7 billion Iran-Pakistan-India gas-pipeline project. In geopolitical terms, the project holds the definite potential to forge a unified Asian energy market, with deep implications for US energy security......"

Current Al-Jazeera (Arabic) Online Poll


This poll exposes the lack of credibility of the Mubarak government in Egypt. The question is:

Do you believe that the Egyptian government is serious in pursuing Israeli officials implicated in the mass killing of Egyptian prisoners of war?

With over 1,200 responding so far, here is the breakdown:

Yes.............3%

No.............97%

Reviving the Arab "Peace" Initiative
By Baha Boukhari

A Surge It Is.....


Nine U.S. soldiers killed north of Baghdad

"Nine American soldiers have been killed and four wounded in two separate attacks in northern and north-eastern Iraq, the US military has said.

"Six Task Force Lightning soldiers were attacked while conducting combat operations in Salah ad Din province on March 5," a statement said on Tuesday.

"The soldiers died as a result of injuries sustained following an explosion near their vehicles."

In a second incident on the same day, three American soldiers were killed by a roadside bomb in Diyala. One soldier was wounded......."

Monday, March 5, 2007

Speak Bird, Speak Again



Speak Bird, Speak Again
Palestinian Arab Folktales
Ibrahim Muhawi and Sharif Kanaana
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS
Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford
© 1989 The Regents of the University of California

This is the book Hamas' "ministry of education" decided to burn. You can read it online.

The Book Burners of Hamas


A Disturbing Article Contributed by Lucia

Dr Kana'nah: Burning my book "speak bird, speak again" is like burning my son

"Ramallah - Ma'an - Professor of sociology and anthropology at Bir Zeit University, Ashraf Kana'nah, has commented on the decision of the Palestinian ministry of education to burn copies of the book he collated with his colleague, Dr Ibrahim Mhawi. The book, collated from Palestinian oral narratives, is entitled "Speak bird, speak again". Dr Kana'nah described the ministry's decision as "cultural terrorism"; while the ministry claims that stories in the book contain "immoral expression".

Kana'nah told Ma'an's correspondent in Ramallah that "those who conducted such measures are not related to academia", since he found no more than three references to sexual activity in a 400 page book.

Dr Kana'nah expressed his disturbance over the burning of his book, saying that "every book one writes is continuity of his own ideology, as much as the son is the biological continuity of his father." He added that it was the ministry of culture who decided to distribute the book at the schools, and they also funded the printing of 3000 copies.

The book was misinterpreted, explained the author, "since it was not meant to be taught to children, as it is taught at the masters and doctorate level [in literature studies]". Kana'nah himself taught the study of the book in the masters programs at Bir Zeit University. In addition, the English version of the book is studied as part of literature courses at both Berkeley and Chicago Universities. It was the best-selling Palestinian academic text book in foreign countries.

"The book should be read by teachers at schools, rather than be given to students, and if the teacher is embarrassed to read some expressions, which the students hear every day, he does not deserve to be a teacher," declared Dr Kana'nah.

The ministry of education allegedly endorsed a decision at the beginning of February to destroy all copies of the book, "Speak bird, speak again" at the libraries of governmental schools under the pretext of containing "filthy expressions".

This book, first published in 1989, contains forty-five folktales drawn from a collection of two hundred tales narrated by women from different areas of historic Palestine (the Galilee, the West Bank, and Gaza). The stories collected were chosen on the basis of their popularity, their aesthetic and narrative qualities, and what they tell about popular Palestinian culture dating back many centuries. In order to maintain the specificity of these tales, it was necessary to transcribe them in the original colloquial dialect in which they were narrated. The tales are accompanied by an in-depth study that compares them to similar cultural products in Arab and world cultures.

For his part, member of the Palestinian People's Party's politburo, Haidar Awadallah, described the decision as "a threat to liquidate the democratic heritage of the Palestinian people and their cultural, literary and ideological pluralism". This is done on behalf of "a fundamental, superficial and close preaching."

Ministerial reaction

Palestinian minister of education, Dr Nasser Addin Ash-Shaer, denied on Monday that his ministry had taken the decision to burn copies of the folktales, claiming that he only heard the news in the media.

Ash-Shaer told Ma'an that the issue "is not about a school's text book, but it is a book that was written in the informal accent which the educational orientation of the ministry found inappropriate for the accent." The minister also denied the news reported about the ministry's decision to burn the book or destroy the copies.

The minister added, "there has been no such decision, and we are not against the people's heritage. Besides, the book is available in the book stores, but it arrived in the schools without our knowledge, and so, the ministry's office is still checking the issue... the book is written in an informal language, which is inappropriate to be taught at schools, as schools teach the formal Arabic only. Furthermore, the book includes filthy expressions, which we can not afford to accept in our schools, and so it is being withdrawn from the libraries only.""

At the Bottom of the Barrel

BBC survey claims Israel has least positive image in the world

"LONDON  Israel, Iran and the United States are the countries with the most negative image in a globe-spanning survey of attitudes toward 12 major nations. Canada and Japan came out best in the poll, released on Monday.

The survey for the British Broadcasting Corp.'s World Service asked more than 28,000 people to rate 12 countries  Britain, Canada, China, France, India, Iran, Israel, Japan, North Korea, Russia, the United States and Venezuela  as having a positive or negative influence on the world.

Israel was viewed negatively by 56 percent of respondents and positively by 17 percent; for Iran, the figures were 54 percent and 18 percent. The United States had the third-highest negative ranking, with 51 percent citing it as a bad influence and 30 percent as a good one. Next was North Korea, which was viewed negatively by 48 percent and positively by 19 percent......"

A "Government" of Beggars


Windbag du Jour






MP Tafesh asks USA, EU to revise bias in favor of Zionists

"AL-KHALIL, (PIC)-- MP Khaled Tafesh on Monday urged USA president George Bush to revise his policies in the Middle East especially in Palestine and to spare the lives of his soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He asked the USA and the EU countries, which are biased in favor of Israel, to stop backing the culprit against the victim and appealed to them to lift the oppressive siege on the Palestinian people imposed more than a year now to punish them for electing Hamas to rule them......."

***

Such leadership! This guy is speaking in exactly the same way the Palestinians begged the British in the 1920s. Nothing learned in 90 years; keep begging, brother!

Robert Fisk on Osama bin Laden at 50, Iraqi Death Squads and Why the Middle East is More Dangerous Now Than in Past 30 Years


Democracy Now!
With Amy Goodman


"Robert Fisk is a veteran war correspondent and one of the world"s most experienced journalists covering the Middle East. He has reported from across the Arab world for the past thirty years. He was in Iraq in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war, in the early 1990s during the Persian Gulf War and most recently during the U.S. invasion and occupation. He has also reported on the civil wars in Algeria and Lebanon, the Iranian revolution, the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, and Israel"s occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.

Robert Fisk joins me in our firehouse studio......

AMY GOODMAN: You mention Lebanon. Let's talk about the situation there today. This is where you have been based for the last thirty years.

ROBERT FISK: Thirty-one, almost, now, yeah. Yes, I mean, I was, you know, like I suppose most Lebanese, I felt, up until July the 12th, the beginning of the war between Hezbollah and the Israelis last summer, that maybe Lebanon had a chance. You know, it was being rebuilt. There wasn't enough money trickling down from the top to the bottom; it was still a lopsided society with the Shiites being the poor and the oppressed as usual. But I thought until we came across -- you know, even when the Shiites pulled out of the government, which was a very serious matter because it meant that once again we were emphasizing the sectarian nature of Lebanese politics, that there might be some form of compromise.

But once we had that strike, which turned so violent -- you know, I turned up on Corniche Mazraa in the western part of Beirut, and there must have been 7,000 people, Muslims, Shiites and Sunnis, chucking rocks and stones at each other. There were seven Lebanese soldiers trying to get between them. I went with them taking pictures. I mean, the stones were bouncing off the soldiers. People were chucking rocks from the top of sixteen-story buildings. It was very dangerous. I thought, civil war was going to restart that day.

And one of the dangerous things at that point was that the young people who were involved were too young to remember the civil war, which of course actually ended in 1990. They might have a faint memory. They would have heard their parents talking about it. And they didn’t realize how quickly it would escalate, how quickly you could deteriorate. Even Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah -- well, the Hezbollah is a very disciplined organization, of course -- was shocked at the speed with which his strike, his civil disobedience strike, descended into total street violence. Then, of course, two days later, guns came on the streets.

Very dangerous situation, because it keeps going back into a sort of semi-denial of the political crisis. We think, OK, well, Lebanon is out of the news, it’s OK again. But the reality is that Lebanon is in great danger of splintering apart again. And I went out, a short time, a short while ago, before I came to America, for dinner in a Sunni area of Beirut. It's a mixed area, but mostly Sunni, and I remember saying, well, how are you getting on with your Shiite neighbors these days? And the woman at the table said, well, actually, most of them have gone on holiday. They've left their keys with their neighbors. They have gone to stay with relatives elsewhere.

Now, that's how it begins. That’s how it happened in Baghdad, people moving out of Sunni areas, people moving out of Shiite areas, if they’re a different religion. One of the frightening things that happened during those January days of violence, including the area where there was shooting used, is that the scenes of street combat were on the same green line of the civil war. In other words, the old fracture between east and west, Beirut and parts of West Beirut, reopened at the exact -- Hazmieh -- exactly the same point. I spent parts of the civil war at Hazmieh watching the fighting, and there, on the same piece of road, it broke apart again. It's like, you know, you keep stitching it up, and it comes undone.

AMY GOODMAN: What about Seymour Hersh's report, where he says that the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia are pumping money for covert operations in many areas of the Middle East, including Lebanon, Syria and Iran, in an effort to strengthen Saudi-supported Sunni Islam groups and weaken Iranian-backed Shiites. Some of the covert money has been given to jihadist groups in Lebanon with ties to al-Qaeda.

ROBERT FISK: Look, Seymour Hersh said that we were going to invade Iraq, and I thought we wouldn't, and he was right and I was wrong. So when Seymour Hersh says we're going to bombard Iran, I remain silent. When Seymour Hersh tells me -- he was in Beirut, of course; he met Nasrallah there -- that we’re pumping money into Sunni extremist groups, I think, well, hang on a second, he got it right and I got it wrong on Iraq.

Look, the truth of the matter is that these various organizations -- and there are some al-Qaeda-type groups, groupuscules, tiny ones in Lebanon, and I’ve met them -- they don't need money from outside. They've got money. Everyone in Lebanon who’s got weapons has money. It's like the same nonsense: we talk about how the Iranians are teaching the Iraqi Shiite insurgents to make bombs. Iraqi insurgents know how to make bombs. They don't need the Iranians to come and teach them. I don't think a lot of money is reaching these people. What I do think is that these various extreme groups are quite possibly being mobilized or encouraged by elements within the -- what we now call the American-supported Lebanese government -- what a kiss of death that is for the Siniora government -- encouraged to remain where they are and to be available in certain circumstances.

You know, a large number of the killings that have taken place in Beirut are not necessarily carried out by the Syrians. Hariri, I think, was a Syrian-engineered plot, yes. But, for example, Pierre Gemayel’s murder, a lot of Lebanese say, well, maybe it was another Christian group behind that. One of the things you find in Lebanon is that there are various groups, some of them Palestinian -- we call them extremists or terrorists, whatever you like -- who are available to help anyone. They can make temporary alliances. They don't need to be given $5 million on the quiet by someone with American money.

The real danger now, you see, is that with an ideological government like you have and like we, I suppose, think we have, we constantly want to assist people who will join us in our campaign. You can go back to Afghanistan. We wanted the warlords on our side against bin Laden. Now we're saddled with the warlords, which is why we can't stamp out the opium trade or the drugs trade. In Iraq, we started --
........"

Click Here to Watch, Listen or Read Transcript of This Long Interview

The Liberators Are Camera-Shy....


Afghan Media: US Troops Deleted Images

"Afghan journalists covering the aftermath of a suicide bomb attack and shooting in eastern Afghanistan Sunday said U.S. troops deleted their photos and video and warned them not to publish or air any images of U.S. troops or a car where three Afghans were shot to death.....

A freelance photographer working for The Associated Press and a cameraman working for AP Television News said a U.S. soldier deleted their photos and video showing a four-wheel drive vehicle in which three people were shot to death about 100 yards from the suicide bombing. The AP plans to lodge a protest with the American military.

The photographer, Rahmat Gul, said witnesses at the scene told him the three had been shot to death by U.S. forces fleeing the attack. The two AP freelancers arrived at the site about a half hour after the suicide bombing, Gul said.

"When I went near the four-wheel drive, I saw the Americans taking pictures of the same car, so I started taking pictures," Gul said. "Two soldiers with a translator came and said, 'Why are you taking pictures? You don't have permission.'"

It wasn't clear why the accredited journalists would need permission to take photos of a civilian car on a public highway.

Gul said the U.S. troops took his camera, deleted his photos and returned it to him. The journalists came across another American, showed their identification cards, and he agreed that they could take pictures.

A Western military official who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to release the information said the troops were Marine Special Operations Forces, the Marine Corps component created in February 2006 of the U.S. Special Operations Command.

"The same soldier who took my camera came again and deleted my photos," Gul said. "The soldier was very angry ... I told him, 'They gave us permission,' but he didn't listen."

Gul's new photos were also deleted, and the American, speaking through a translator, warned him that he did not want to see any AP photos published anywhere. The American also raised his fist in anger as if he were going to hit him, but he did not strike, Gul said.

Lt. Col. David Accetta, a U.S. military spokesman, said he did not have any confirmed reports that coalition forces "have been involved in confiscating cameras or deleting images."

Khanwali Kamran, a reporter for the Afghan channel Ariana Television, was in a small group of journalists working alongside Gul. Kamran said the American soldiers also deleted his footage.

"They warned me that if it is aired ... then, 'You will face problems,'" Kamran said.

Taqiullah Taqi, a reporter for Afghanistan's largest television station, Tolo TV, said Americans were using abusive language.

"According to the translator, they said, 'Delete them, or we will delete you,'" Taqi said.

A freelance cameraman for AP Television News said that about 100 yards from the bomb site, a U.S. officer told him that he could not go any closer to the scene but that he could shoot footage. The cameraman asked not to be named for his own safety.

"Then I started filming the suicide attack site, where there was a body and U.S. soldiers, and farther away, there was a four-wheel drive vehicle in which three people were shot to death," he said.

As he was filming, he said, a U.S. soldier and translator "ordered us not to move." The cameraman said they were very angry and deleted any footage that included the Americans, as well as part of an interview from a demonstration. Hundreds of Afghans had gathered to protest the violence.

Reporters Without Borders condemned the actions of the U.S. forces, saying they dealt with the press poorly.

"Why did the soldiers do it if they don't have anything to hide? The situation is very tense in Afghanistan, and the media should be able to report about it freely and safely," said Jean-Francois Julliard, a spokesman for the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders."

US pressurizing Pak to get its support for attack on Iran: Gul


ISLAMABAD: Former ISI Chief, Gen (retd) Hameed Gul has said that the Untied States is paving the way to use Pakistan's territory for its expected attack on Iran in order to shift the blame of its failure in Afghanistan to Pakistan.

"Talking to a private TV Channel, Gen (retd) Hameed Gul said that NATO forces have intensified their activities on Pak-Afghan border as they are frustrated due to their failure in Afghanistan.

Former ISI Chief has said that US backed Karzai government has been completely failed in Afghanistan and the United States has now realized that they are now facing strong resistance from Taliban.

General (retd) Hamid Gul said that its an American policy to use different tactics to pressurize Pakistan and the main objective of recent visit of US Vice President Dick Cheney to pressurize Pakistan as US would need Pakistan's support and Balochistan land to attack Iran. He said that it may be the possibility that Pakistani government is refusing the United States to given permission to use its land......"

Liars Caught on Camera



US seizes Afghan shooting footage

"US forces in Afghanistan tried to confiscate video and destroy photographic evidence taken after a shooting incident that left at least 10 civilians dead, witnesses have told Al Jazeera.

Footage obtained by Al Jazeera shows the scene in Nangarhar province immediately after US forces opened fire following a car bomb attack on their convoy. The footage included a scenes of local people in shock, treating the wounded and pulling bodies from the debris left by the shooting......

'Complete lie'

Witnesses say the suicide bomber had acted alone, that there were no accomplices and that US troops had panicked, firing at anything that moved immediately after the attack.

One told Al Jazeera: "There were no gunmen, this is a complete lie. This is a peaceful area, we don't have guns."

The dead included an 80-year-old man, whose grand-son said: "A bomb exploded, my grandfather sat in a car and at that time American soldiers were shooting into my grandfather's car."........"

Preparing for the Arab "Summit"

A Horse of a Different Color


Obama, the Lobby, and the next war

By Justin Raimondo

"It had to happen sooner or later, and Barack Obama's startling rise to near the top of the Democratic presidential pack made it sooner – I'm talking about his speech to the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). It starts out with a riff about his ride in an IDF helicopter and how this made him "truly see how close everything is and why peace through security is the only way for Israel." But of course the Palestinians are just as close to the Israelis as the Israelis are to them – and the Israelis have far more arms (provided by the U.S.) and are surely not averse to using them. So what is "the only way" for the Palestinians? Yet there can be no "peace through security" for the Palestinians, since there is no security from Israeli air strikes and repeated invasions of Palestinian territory.

The maudlin emotionalism of Obama's appeal is nowhere more apparent than in this speech, and nowhere more inappropriately one-sided. But, here, listen to Obama tell it:

"Our helicopter landed in the town of Kiryat Shmona on the border. What struck me first about the village was how familiar it looked. The houses and streets looked like ones you might find in a suburb in America. I could imagine young children riding their bikes down the streets. I could imagine the sounds of their joyful play just like my own daughters. There were cars in the driveway. The shrubs were trimmed. The families were living their lives."

Oh, please spare us! Does Mr. Obama really not know that there are – or were – similar communities in the occupied territories? Does he really not know that countless Palestinian villages – with "houses and streets like you might find in a suburb in America" – have been demolished by Israeli tractors? Can Obama imagine a young Palestinian child riding his bike down the street – can he imagine his joyful play? Can he imagine a car in the driveway, the shrubs trimmed – the families living their lives in the moment before the Israelis wiped it all out in their ruthless campaign of conquest and ethnic cleansing?......

As if that wasn't enough, he went on to endorse yet another prospective war, assuring his audience that he is willing to sign on to both prongs of the renewed Israeli-American aggression in the region. Obama touts his proposal for a "phased redeployment" (never say "withdrawal"!) from Iraq as giving us a chance to focus on the real threat to peace in the region: Iran. Bravely coming out against Holocaust denial – that Obama sure is a risk-taker! – this rising Democratic star delivered a truly Orwellian account of the Lebanese-Israeli war......

Obama quails at the very thought that the Palestinians would have a government that includes Hamas, but nowhere does he mention that Hamas was elected. Nor does the presence of the party of Avigdor Lieberman in the Israeli government raise so much as an eyebrow. Israel is praised by Obama for being "the only established democracy," but Palestinian elections and Israeli elections – like Palestinian lives and Israeli lives – are not to be equated......

Obama went before AIPAC, skillfully executed the ritualized gestures of obeisance without too brazenly defying his antiwar constituency, and in this way proved his mettle. The exact meaning of this ceremony was prefigured in "The Israel Lobby," a Harvard University study by Professors John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt:

"The goal is to prevent critical comments from getting a fair hearing in the political arena. Controlling the debate is essential to guaranteeing U.S. support, because a candid discussion of U.S.-Israeli relations might lead Americans to favor a different policy."......

But Obama is a horse of an entirely different color, and, no, I'm not talking about his skin color. He is not an alternative to the still hawkish Democratic Party establishment – hawkish, that is, compared to the average American voter – but only the appearance of one. He's all form and no content – a perfect replica of rebellion for the new millennium: slick, bromidic, and phony as all get-out. He's the Democrats' Wendell Willkie, the man who came out of nowhere, a public relations creation. Obama will disarm the Left on account of his color and overwhelm the Right on the sheer strength of his star power. Or so his strategists dream. In the end, however, our foreign policy will remain pretty much the same: aggressive, arrogant, and the cause of our ultimate undoing. "

Sunday, March 4, 2007

قمة الرياض... اخطر القمم؟

An Important Analysis (Arabic)

"عبد الباري عطوان

05/03/2007

تتصاعد الأحاديث، في السر والعلن، حول ادخال تعديلات علي مبادرة السلام العربية تسقط الشق المتعلق بحق العودة وهو الشرط الذي تفرضه الدولة العبرية لقبولها والاعتراف بها.
هذه الاحاديث تتزامن مع اقتراب انعقاد القمة العربية العادية في الرياض في اواخر الشهر الحالي، والزيارة التي من المقرر ان تقوم بها السيدة كوندوليزا رايس وزيرة الخارجية الامريكية إلي المنطقة بعد عشرة ايام.
الصحف العبرية تتحدث هذه الايام باسهاب عن اللقاءات التي اجراها ويجريها الامير بندر بن سلطان بن عبد العزيز امين عام مجلس الامن القومي السعودي مع مسؤولين اسرائيليين من اجل التنسيق بشأن الملف النووي الايراني وكيفية معالجته، وتعديل مبادرة السلام العربية بما يؤدي الي تقديم صيغة مبتكرة تلتف حول حق العودة، وتجعله محصورا باراضي الدولة الفلسطينية المستقبلية، اي في الضفة والقطاع وتوطين اللاجئين في مناطق اقامتهم في سورية ولبنان والاردن اذا ما فضلوا البقاء في مخيماتهم.

........

الشعب الفلسطيني لا يتعرض للتجويع والحصار بسبب خياره الديمقراطي فقط، وانما لتيئيسه، واجباره علي قبول صيغة التسوية الجديدة، والتنازل عن حق العودة بشكل نهائي، علي اعتبار ان هذه التسوية هي ثمرة توافق عربي ودعم كامل من قبل الدول الاسلامية السنية الرئيسية، أي ان عليه ان يرضخ للإرادتين العربية والاسلامية اذا اراد ان يحصل علي لقمة الخبز له ولأطفاله.
وليس صدفة ان تكون النقطة الأبرز علي جدول اعمال حكومة الوحدة الوطنية هي كيفية مأسسة التسول، ورفع الحصار، وايصال المساعدات العربية والدولية، والتجاوب بشكل مباشر او غير مباشر مع شروط اللجنة الرباعية الدولية.
المطلوب حكومة فلسطينية تجيد التسول وتنضم لتحالف محور المعتدلين ، وتسهل المشروع الامريكي الجديد لضرب ايران ومفاعلها النووي، واسقاط النظام السوري، وانهاء المقاومة باعتبارها ارهابا، اما المقابل فربما يكون دولة مؤقتة منزوعة الكرامة، وبلا حدود واضحة، ولا سيادة، فقط رشوة مالية ضخمة، تكون عبارة عن حقنة تخديرية مؤقتة، ريثما ينجح المشروع الامريكي الجديد، ثم يتم مسح كل ذلك والتراجع عنه، تماما مثلما حدث لاتفاقات اوسلو وصيغة الحكم الذاتي التي تمخضت عنها. ألم تتخل الولايات المتحدة عن افغانستان ومجاهديها بعد نجاح مشروعها في طرد السوفييت وإذلالهم؟
"

Abbas, Haniyeh meet in Gaza, fail to make progress on unity gov't


What Palestinian "Unity" Talks Need

"Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh failed to make progress on talks toward forming a unity government, an official said early Monday.

Hamas cabinet spokesman Ghazi Hamad said they hoped to present a government by the end of the period allotted to Haniyeh, which expires in two weeks.

"We have not completed the consultations today. They will continue over the coming days," he said ......."

أضعف الإيمان!


بقلم : د.إبراهيم حمّامي

"قد نتفهم أن يتلهى سياسيو فلسطين وقادتها باتفاق مكة وتشكيل حكومة الوحدة الوطنية، وقد نجد لهم عذراً في محادثاتهم ولقاءاتهم الماراثونية للتباحث في الوزارات والوزراء، وقد نفهم انشغالهم المطلق بتفسير وتحليل الكلمات من نوعية "احترام" و"التزام"، ومن الممكن أن نستوعب أن خروج حكومة الوحدة الوطنية أمر مفصلي هام في تاريخنا المعاصر، لكن ما لا يمكن أن يستوعبه عقل أن يذبح الشعب الفلسطيني ولا يستوجب ذلك وقفة منهم جادة حاسمة في وجه آلة الإجرام الحاقدة التي تعيث خراباً وتدميراً بكل ما تطاله، وفي وضح النهار، وعلى مرأى ومسمع من العالم الذي يضغط على شعبنا صباح مساء ليركع ويخضع.

منذ اللحظات الأولى لتوقيع اتفاق مكة والاحتلال يصعّد من وتيرة هجماته على شعبنا الصامد في محاولة يائسة لضرب معنوياته والتأثير على قراره بالمقاومة المشروعة العادلة، وبلغت ذروة الاعتداءات قبل ايام باقتحام مدينة نابلس في حملة همجية بربرية، لم يكن نصيبها من القيادة الفلسطينية إلا التنديد والاستنكار.

ضعف الرد الفلسطيني، أو لنقل انعدامه، خاصة مع وجود طرف فلسطيني يصر على اللقاء مع المحتل دون شروط، بل يزيد على ذلك مطالبته بتثبيت التهدئة الهشة في جزء من فلسطين ليذبح جزءا آخر منها، وطرف آخر يعتبر أن اي عدوان هو لإجهاض اتفاق مكة، اللاموقف هذا والتمسك بحبائل الوهم شجّع المحتل على التمادي أكثر وأكثر، وأرسل رسالة واهنة لكنها واضحة مفادها: لسنا بصدد اتخاذ أي خطوات من اي نوع سياسية أو شعبية أو جماهيرية أو غيرها، لأن التمسك باتفاق مكة هو الرد الوحيد لنا، ومولد حكومة جديدة تحت أي مسمى ودون تحفظات - حتى ولو كان من ضمن وزرائها افسد الفاسدين أو من تلطخت اياديهم بدماء شعبنا- هو المواجهة الوحيدة لدينا!

قبل أن يسيء البعض الظن، فلست بحال ضد اتفاق الشعب الفلسطيني وحقن دمائه، ولا ضد حكومة الوحدة الوطنية، لكني وبصراحة تامة ضد أن يتحول الاتفاق والحكومة لشماعة نعلق عليها ضعفنا وعجزنا، لتصبح عذرنا الدائم وتبريرنا لانتصارنا المعنوي على المحتل، وضد أن تطغى أخبار الاتفاق والحكومة على أخبار الحرب الحقيقية التي يشنها المحتل الغاصب على شعب فلسطين، في ظل إما تعتيم إعلامي أو تركيز غير مبرر ولا مفهوم على زيارات الزعماء ومباحثات الأخوة ولقاءات وتصريحات القادة.

معالم الحرب الحقيقية ظهرت واضحة جلية لتشمل كل شيء وبكل الوسائل مما استدعى صدور بيانات استغاثة من نابلس لم تلق آذانا صاغية بعد، وهذه بعض الجرائم التي ارتكبت بحق أبناء شعبنا وقضيته وحقوقه خلال ال 24 ساعة الماضية، دون أن تجد لها مكاناً حقيقياً لا اعلامياً ولا سياسياً ولا شعبياً، والقادم أعظم

إعدام ثلاثة من مقاتلي "سرايا القدس" ، الذراع العسكري لحركة الجهاد الإسلامي في مدينة جنين بدم بارد وهم: أشرف السعدي، أحد قادة السرايا في جنين، وبلال أبو ناعسة، وعلاء بريكة .

إعادة اجتياح مدينة نابلس وللمرة الثانية خلال يومين بأكثر من 140 آلية وعربة عسكرية مدعومة بالجرافات العسكرية ومن جميع المحاور وسط تحليق طائرات الاستطلاع، وتقسيم المدينة ومحاصرة مستشفياتها الثلاثة رفيديا والوطني والاتحاد.

في عمل جبان: إختطاف عدد من أقارب من تسميهم قوات الإحتلال مطلوبين للضغط عليهم لتسليم أنفسهم منهم والدة أمين لبادة، وشقيقات وأشقاء مهدي أبو غزالة

اقتحام موجات البث للمحطات المحلية وبث إعلانات خاصة بجيش الإحتلال

اجبار فتاة فلسطينية في العشرينات من عمرها تحت تهديد السلاح على التجرد من ملابسها قبل اعتقالها ومصادرة ما بحوزتها من حقائب وأمتعة وذلك على حاجز الكونتينر شمال شرق بيت لحم .

الإعلان عن مخطط لبناء حى إستيطاني جديد في القدس يضم 11 ألف وحدة سكنية بالقرب من حاجز قلنديا، هو الأكبر في منطقة القدس منذ عام 1967 !

إختطاف النائب حاتم قفيشة من كتلة "التغيير والإصلاح" في الخليل

إصدار أمر بإغلاق فندق "الكومدور" في حي الطور في القدس الشرقية، من المفوّض العام للشرطة موشي كرادي، وذلك لمنع عقد المؤتمر الصحفي الذي كان مقرراً عقده، من قبل شخصيات دينية، إسلامية ومسيحية، يتم خلاله توقيع وثيقة "العهد والميثاق" لحفظ القدس والأقصى وسائر المقدسات الإسلامية والمسيحية.

تسريب أنباء عن خطة لاجتياح قطاع غزة برياً بحجة الأنفاق.

رغم إعلان الحرب وأدلته السابقة هناك من سيطرح سؤال مشروع: ماذا يمكن لنا ان نفعل؟ لكن ايضاً إجابته مشروعة لمن أراد أن يقف موقفا شجاعا حاسما، ومن هذا المنطلق وحتى نخرج من باب التشخيص والتحليل نقترح ونطالب بما يلي:

الإعلان الفوري عن وقف المباحثات والمفاوضات مع أعضاء اللجنة الرباعية وكل وفود العالم حتى يتوقف العدوان وبشكل فوري غير مشروط.

تحديد شروط فلسطينية واضحة لا لبس فيها قبل لقاء أي مبعوث من أهمها رفع الحصار الجائر وإطلاق سراح الأسرى والإفراج عن الأموال المحتجزة وتحرير المعابر

تجميد كل مؤسسات السلطة الفلسطينية والاعلان عن إضراب شامل ومفتوح يستثنى منه قطاعي الصحة والتعليم.

النزول إلى الشوارع والساحات والميادين ومواجهة المحتل جماهيرياً وشعبياً في كل نقاط التماس .

التركيز إعلامياً وفي جميع الوسائل على ممارسات الإحتلال وجرائمه

هل هذه الخطوات أمر واقعي يمكن تطبيقه أم خطوات مثالية حالمة؟، بالتأكيد هي قابلة للتطبيق لسبب بسيط أن ما تحتاجه هو قرار فلسطيني بحت، ولنتذكر ان السلطة والحكومة وغيرها هي احتياجات دولية ايضاً لتهدئة الأوضاع، وإذا كان العالم يفرض على الشعب الفلسطيني حصاراً جائرا، مطالباً إياه بالرضوخ للمحتل، فعلى ذات العالم أن يتحمل مسؤولياته كاملة في وقف العدوان، أو ليتحمل عواقب انتفاضة فلسطينية ثالثة باتت أقرب من أي وقت مضى.

نعم تعب الشعب الفلسطيني وأنهكه الحصار والمقاطعة، ونال منه الجوع والفقر، لكن هل يعتقد اي منا أن المحتل سيتركنا وشأننا بحكومة وحدة وطنية أو بدونها؟ وهل إدارة شؤوننا اليومية يعني غض الطرف عن ممارسات المحتل؟ وبالتأكيد لسنا بيائسين أو عاجزين حتى عن قول كلمة "لا"، كما يدعي حافظ البرغوثي في مقاله المعنون "العجز" حين قال: أن الفلسطينيين عاجزون عن إدارة شؤونهم، وكأنهم قصّر بحاجة إلى رعاية ولي أمر، مضيفا أن "العجز سمة المرحلة الفلسطينية الراهنة، عجز القيادات وعجز الكوادر وعجز المقاومة وتسرب هذا العجز إلى المواطن الذي بدا يائسا مما يحدث".

على قيادات الشعب الفلسطيني تقع مسؤولية حماية الشعب واتخاذ ما يلزم للدفاع عنه، وفي ظل ميزان قوى غير عادل وظالم علينا أن نتسلح بكل ما لدينا وليس أقله رفض ما يجري واعلان العصيان على العالم برمته، لأننا نملك أقوى سلاح على الإطلاق وهو قرارانا وإرادتنا، إلا إذا ارتضينا - كما ارتضى البعض- أن نتحول لوكلاء للمحتل، أو لشعب همه الوحيد بطنه، ليأكل ويشرب وينام كالأنعام أو أضل سبيلا... معاذ الله.

الإحتلال قائم وموجود على كل حبة تراب من فلسطيننا الحبيبة وباعتراف حتى من اعترف بالمحتل وشرعيته، ليتحمل الاحتلال نتائج احتلاله بدلاً من تجميله بأوهام السلطة والسيادة، وليتحمل العالم معه تبعات ظلمه ودعمه للجلاد على حساب الضحية، ولنقف ولو لمرة تحت راية واحدة وبصوت واحد وباتفاق واحد - وليكن اتفاق مكة- لنمارس حقنا المشروع المكفول بكل شرائع السماء والأرض، لنبني مجتمعنا وحكومتنا ومؤسساتنا، لكن في نفس الوقت لنواجه الاحتلال البغيض.

هذا أضعف الإيمان! "

Sy Hersh: Neolib Disinfo Operative?


Once in a while, Kurt Nimmo goes over the edge; this article is an example. I disagree with this article by Nimmo and I strongly agree with what Seymour Hersh has reported. Saudi Arabia and the rest of the "moderate" Arab kennel have been working to stir anti-Shia sentiment and to agitate against Iran for sometime. The boy king of Jordan has been warning about a so-called Shia crescent, so has Mubarak. The "moderate" mongrels were openly cheerleading for Israel against Hizbullah last summer. The facts on the ground in Lebanon support what Hersh reported about Al-Qaeda-affiliated "Sunni" groups in Lebanon receiving arms and financing from the Siniora government and outside financiers, including KSA. Just because Ahmadinejad met King Abdullah does not prove that KSA is working to reduce sectarian tensions. The trip could have been to deliver a warning by Iran that this sectarian war that KSA is inflaming (on behalf of Usrael) could easily consume the Arab "moderate" leaders and their regimes.

A senior Palestinian leader who was involved in the discussions in Mecca that led to the agreement to establish a so-called "national unity government" was told bluntly by Saudi officials, "a Sunni-Shia war is coming, which side are you on?"

Tony Sayegh


"......If so, this does not explain why “Sunni and Shi’ite heavyweights Saudi Arabia and Iran” are working together “to fight the spread of sectarian strife that threatens to spill over from their neighbor Iraq,” according to Reuters. “Saudi King Abdullah held talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who was on his first official trip to Saudi Arabia. A Saudi official said earlier the kingdom would seek Iran’s help to ease sectarian tensions in Iraq erupting into full-blown civil war.” If indeed Saudi Arabia is working with the neocons to undermine the influence of the Shi’a in Lebanon—and if we are to believe Hersh and his “sources,” Iran itself—how do we explain Abdullah and Ahmadinejad making nice?....

Considering this, it makes perfect sense Sy Hersh, writing for a “liberal” magazine revamped by Tina “Lady Evans” Brown, who got her start working for the “conservative” Sunday Telegraph, would serve as a disinfo conduit, writing one article after another taking the neocons to task, much to their chagrin."---Kurt Nimmo.

By Mike Luckovich