Monday, October 20, 2008

A traitor in Baghdad, a traitor in Kabul


By Khalid Amayreh

".....The American occupation forces are in Iraq in order to destroy Iraq, which they have done to a large extent, torment Iraqis, and transform the land of Harun al Rashid into a virtual Zionist colony serving “ global Jewish-Zionist interests.”

Moreover, the Americans seem hell-bent on arrogating Iraqi oil by turning Iraq into a banana republic, a mere cheap market for American products.

Another important reason behind the American occupation of Iraq is to forestall the potential of Iraq becoming a threat to Zionist military supremacy once again. Otherwise, why would Mossad agents scour Iraq from north to south and from east to west to assassinate top Iraqi scientists, probably in collusion with American, Kurdish and (Iraqi) intelligence services.

In short, the United States wants to destroy or neutralize Iraq on Israel’s behalf. Wasn’t that the main factor behind the American invasion, occupation and virtual destruction of the ancient land of Mesopotamia ?....

Today, the traitor of Baghdad, the Ibn al-Alqami of our time ( Ibn Al-'Alqami was the vizier of the last Abbasid caliph in Baghdad, Al- Musta'sim, who is accused of opening the gates of Baghdad to the armies of Hulago) is effectively allowing the US to maintain a number of military and air-bases on Iraqi soil which would be used against fellow Arab and Muslim countries, or at least to maintain America’s hegemony over oil fields in the region.

Equally obscene is the Iraqi leader’s initial consent to granting American soldiers who murder and rape Iraqis a virtual immunity from prosecution by Iraqi courts.

What happened to the honor of Iraq and the Iraqi people? Is it being trampled upon, not only by the Zionist-American invaders, but also by Iraq’s own quisling government and its so-called prime minister who doesn’t stop claiming to be serving the national interests of his country and people?......

And now the traitor of Kabul, Hamid Karzi, the so-called “President of Afghanistan” who represents even a cheaper and more pornographic type of quislings than the traitor of Baghdad........"

No comments: